Progesterone's role in deep infiltrating endometriosis: Progesterone receptor and estrogen metabolism enzymes expression and physiological changes in primary endometrial stromal cell culture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.110743Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Deep infiltrating endometriosis stromal down expresses progesterone receptor.

  • CYP19 are main character in deep infiltrating endometriosis cells estrogen metabolism disruption.

  • HSD17B2 is overexpressed in deep infiltrating endometriosis primary cells.

  • Deep infiltrating endometriosis primary cells do not respond to progesterone stimulus in vitro.

Abstract

To study progesterone signaling activation, we measured changes in extracellular pH as a reflection of Na+/H+ exchange (NHE) using a cytosensor microphysiometer and assessed progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen metabolism enzymes mRNA expression in cultured endometrial cells from women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and healthy controls using real-time quantitative PCR. This study was conducted at a University hospital and included patients with and without deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). Primary endometrial stromal cells (ECs) from women with DIE and controls were treated with 17β-estradiol and progesterone prior to microphysiometer measurements and qPCR evaluations. Decreased progesterone responsiveness and decreased total nuclear PR and HSD17B1 mRNA expression were observed in cultured ECs from women with deep infiltrating endometriosis relative to those from control samples before and after hormone treatment. These cells also showed increased 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases types 2 (HSD17B2) relative to control group and increased expression of aromatase (CYP19) after exposure to progesterone. These physiological and expression patterns observed in ECs cultures from women with DIE reinforces previous findings in the literature supporting the progesterone resistance hypothesis in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

Introduction

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by the implantation and growth of endometrial tissue outside of the uterus. This disease affects 10% of women of reproductive age and is significantly associated with infertility, chronic pain, and morbidity. Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), which occurs in approximately 1% of women of reproductive age is characterized by the penetration of endometrial-like tissue >5 mm under the peritoneal surface (Koninckx and Martin, 1994) and represents the most severe form of endometriosis causing severe pain in the vast majority of affected women. It is characterized by the presence of rectovaginal nodules and disease in the uterosacral ligaments, rectum, rectovaginal septum, vaginal and bladder (Giudice, 2010; Berlanda et al., 2017; Johnson et al., 2017).

Environmental, immune, and hormonal factors in particular are associated with the etiology of the endometriosis. Several studies pointed that women with the disease unveil several abnormalities in the eutopic endometrium, raising questions about whether the uterine mucosa is involved in the pathogenesis of the disease, a hypothesis known as the endometrial theory (Vinatier et al., 2000; Bulun et al., 2006).

Moreover, several local hormonal abnormalities have been observed in the topic endometrium of women with the disease. One interesting aspect of endometriosis is its dependence on estrogen for growth, similar to that seen in the eutopic endometrium, but with a lack of a consistent response to progesterone in some women with deep infiltrating disease (Abdelsamie et al., 2017). Substantial molecular differences in the progesterone response of normal endometrium and ectopic tissues from women with endometriosis have been observed. According to recent reports, the resistance of endometrial tissue to progesterone, which has been shown in both laboratory and clinical observations, is partially explained by abnormalities in the distribution of progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms and the dysregulation of progesterone target genes (Barragan et al., 2016; Kao et al., 2003; OSTEEN et al., 2002; Zeitoun et al., 1998).

The expression of the enzymes related to the estrogen metabolism have been also related to the pathogenesis of the disease and have controversial results among the literature (Rižner, 2009). It is well known that the metabolic pathways in endometriosis are imbalanced in the sense of augmented estradiol (E2) biosynthesis and lower E2 inactivation leading to increased proliferation of the endometrioctic tissues (Giudice and Kao, 2004). The main responsible for this imbalance seems to be the down or absent expression of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases types 2 (HSD17B2) even with progesterone stimulus (Zeitoun et al., 1998; Dassen et al., 2007; Šmuc et al., 2009; Attar and Bulun, 2006). Although some studies suggest HSD17B2 is higher in DIE and ovarian endometriosis both mRNA and protein (Matsuzaki et al., 2004, 2006; Carneiro et al., 2007). Osiński et al. found a non-statistically significant increasing trend of HSD17B2 transcript levels in the eutopic endometrium during the folicular phase (Osiński et al., 2018). Also, other enzymes such as aromatase (CYP19), 17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase types 1 (HSD17B1) and 4 (HSD17B4), steroids sulfatase (STS) and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) were also reported to be involved in the impaired estrogenic metabolism in endometriosis (Rižner, 2009; Matsuzaki et al., 2004, 2006; Kitawaki et al., 2003).

Based on previous evidence of endometrial resistance to progesterone and its involvement in the etiology and development of endometriosis, we aimed to verify, in vitro, whether this phenomenon is also present in samples from women with deep infiltrating endometriosis. For that, we assessed progesterone receptor (PR), aromatase – CYP19, 17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase types 1, 2 and 4 – HSD17B1, HSD17B2 and HSD17B4; steroids sulfatase – STS and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein – StAR mRNA expression in cultured endometrial cells from women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and healthy controls using real-time quantitative PCR and measured changes in extracellular pH as a reflection of Na+/H+ exchange (NHE) using a cytosensor microphysiometer after 17β-estradiol and progesterone stimulation.

Section snippets

Study participants and sample collection

Endometrial samples were obtained from informed volunteers at the Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis Unit of the Gynecology Department, of the Federal University of São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP). The Institutional Ethics Review Board [IRB no. 1920/11] had previously approved the study. Women undergoing laparoscopy for a routine evaluation of infertility and treatment for endometriosis were recruited. All patients had a history of regular menses and had not taken any sex steroids or steroid-modulating

Experimental subjects

The characteristics of 11 women included in Endometriosis and 9 women in the Control group are described in Table 1. The mean of age (Endometriosis: 33.45 ± 1.37 versus Control: 33.67 ± 1.00 years; p = 0.7037) between the groups was not statistically different and the proportion of women in proliferative or secretory cycle stage was not different between DIE (63.6% and 36.4%) and Control (44.4% and 55.6%; p = 0.684) groups.

Primary endometrial cell culture

Cultures of endometrial stromal cells were developed using methods

Discussion

Our study presented pharmacological and molecular evidence of decreased endometrial responsiveness to progesterone after in vitro treatment with estradiol and progesterone, as well as lower expression levels of progesterone receptors (PR) in primary cultures of endometrial stromal cells from women with endometriosis compared with those from the control group. Also, as we do not observe differentially expressed mRNA that codes to enzymes of the estrogen metabolism after hormonal treatment in DIE

Funding

This work was supported by grants 2009/52974-3 and 2010/50409-4 from the São Paulo State Research Funding Agency (FAPESP).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Gil Kamergorodsky: Investigation, Methodology, Data curation. Adriana L. Invitti: Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Paulo D'Amora: Methodology, Writing - original draft. Rafael M. Parreira: Methodology. Alexander Kopelman: Methodology. Tatiana C.S. Bonetti: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Manoel J.B.C. Girão: Resources, Visualization. Eduardo Schor: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no affiliations that would constitute a financial conflict of interest regarding the subject matter presented in this study.

Acknowledgements

We thank the World Endometriosis Society (WES) for having selecting preliminary results from this paper for presentation at the 12th World Congress on Endometriosis (WCE 2014) held in São Paulo, Brazil (April 2014). We are thankful to the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grants nº 2012/00988-3 and nº 2012/08419-8.

References (55)

  • S. Matsuzaki et al.

    Differential expression of genes in eutopic and ectopic endometrium from patients with ovarian endometriosis

    Fertil. Steril.

    (2006)
  • J. Meola et al.

    Differentially expressed genes in eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis

    Fertil. Steril.

    (2010)
  • T.L. Rižner

    Estrogen metabolism and action in endometriosis

    Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.

    (2009)
  • E. Schor et al.

    P27Kip1 is down-regulated in the endometrium of women with endometriosis

    Fertil. Steril.

    (2009)
  • T. Šmuc et al.

    Disturbed estrogen and progesterone action in ovarian endometriosis

    Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.

    (2009)
  • D. Vinatier et al.

    Is endometriosis an endometrial disease?

    Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.

    (2000)
  • R.-J. Zuo et al.

    Warburg-like glycolysis and lactate shuttle in mouse decidua during early pregnancy

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2015)
  • L. Aghajanova et al.

    Steroidogenic enzyme and key decidualization marker dysregulation in endometrial stromal cells from women with versus without endometriosis

    Biol. Reprod.

    (2009)
  • E. Attar et al.

    Aromatase and other steroidogenic genes in endometriosis: translational aspects

    Hum. Reprod. Update

    (2006)
  • G.R. Attia et al.

    Progesterone receptor isoform A but not B is expressed in endometriosis 1

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (2000)
  • F. Barragan et al.

    Human endometrial fibroblasts derived from mesenchymal progenitors inherit progesterone resistance and acquire an inflammatory phenotype in the endometrial niche in Endometriosis 1

    Biol. Reprod.

    (2016)
  • R. Bartrons et al.

    Hypoxia, glucose metabolism and the Warburg's effect

    J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.

    (2007)
  • K. Bruner-Tran et al.

    Dioxin and endometrial progesterone resistance

    Semin. Reprod. Med.

    (2010)
  • S.E. Bulun et al.

    Estrogen production and metabolism in endometriosis

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2009)
  • S. Bulun et al.

    Estrogen receptor-β, estrogen receptor-α, and progesterone resistance in endometriosis

    Semin. Reprod. Med.

    (2010)
  • R.O. Burney et al.

    Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis

    Endocrinology

    (2007)
  • H. Cakmak et al.

    Molecular mechanisms of treatment resistance in endometriosis: the role of progesterone–hox gene interactions

    Semin. Reprod. Med.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text