Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Probabilistic Modelling for Earthquake Forecasting in the Northwestern Part of Haryana State, India

  • Regular Issue
  • Published:
Pure and Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to estimate the probability of the occurrence of large earthquakes (Mw ≥ 5.5) in the northwestern part of Haryana state, India, where a new nuclear power plant (NPP) is going to be constructed in the near future. First, an earthquake catalogue is developed for the period 1803–1986, and five stochastic models, namely lognormal, Weibull, gamma, Rayleigh, and double exponential, are then applied to past earthquake data. The performance of these models is checked using three statistical tests, and the lognormal, Weibull, and Rayleigh models are found to produce good approximations for this region, whereas the double exponential and gamma models yield intermediate and poor results. Hence, cumulative and conditional probabilities and related hazard curves for future earthquakes are estimated using the most suitable models. The cumulative probability of the occurrence of an earthquake (Mw ≥ 5.5) since the last event (1986) reached 0.95–0.98 as of 2018. The conditional probability of the occurrence of such an earthquake reaches 0.90–0.95 about 9–12 years from now (2027–2030), when the elapsed time will be 32 years (i.e., since 2018). The probability of earthquakes with different threshold magnitudes is then estimated, and based on the outcome of this investigation, earthquake magnitudes are classified from occasional (Mw ≤ 6.1) to very rare events (Mw ≥ 7.6) that this region may experience in the future. The findings of this study will be considered in seismic hazard assessment, liquefaction hazard assessment, and earthquake-resistant design of NPP components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AERB (Atomic Energy Regulatory Board). (1990). Seismic Studies and Design Basis Ground Motion for Nuclear Power Plant Sites. Standard AERB/SG/S-11, AERB.

  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,19(6), 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N. (2000). Reappraisal of north-Indian earthquakes at the turn of the 20th century. Current Science,79(9), 1237–1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N., & Bilham, R. (2000). A note on the Kangra Ms = 7.8 earthquake of 4 April 1905. Current Science,79(1), 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys, N. N., & Douglas, J. (2004). Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International,159(1), 165–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, U. (1977). Earthquakes of peninsular India—A seismotectonic study. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,67(5), 1387–1413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, D., & Shukla, J. (2011). Probability of occurrence and study of earthquake recurrence models for Gujarat state in India. Disaster Advances,4(2), 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,58(5), 1583–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, R., Sharma, M. L., Wason, H. R., Choudhury, D., & Gonzalez, G. (2019). A seismic moment magnitude scale. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,109(4), 1542–1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, R., Wason, H. R., Gonzalez, G., Sharma, M. L., Choudhury, D., Lindholm, C., et al. (2018). Earthquake magnitude conversion problem. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,108(4), 1995–2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S. S., & Choudhury, D. (2014). Earthquake catalogue for estimating seismic hazard at Greater Mumbai, India. Disaster Advances,7(10), 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. (2011). ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraes, S. G. (2003). The conditional probability of earthquake occurrence and the next large earthquake in Tokyo. Journal of Seismology,7(2), 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. K., & Knopoff, L. (1974). Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,64(5), 1363–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI. (2000). Seismotectonic Atlas of India and Its Environs. Kolkata: Geological Survey of India, Special Publication 59.

  • Gutenberg, B., & Richter, C. F. (1944). Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,34(4), 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiwara, Y. (1974). Probability of earthquake occurrence as obtained from a Weibull distribution analysis of crustal strain. Tectonophysics,23(3), 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893-Part 1. (2016). Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design Of Structures. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R. N., Sharma, D., & Siddiqui, J. M. (1999). Earthquake history of India in medieval times. Indian Journal of history of science,34(3), 181–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., Kotz, S., & Balakrishnan, N. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 2 (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. C., & Nava, S. J. (1985). Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid seismic zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,90(B8), 6737–6753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, T. H. (2006). Earthquake predictability, brick by brick. Seismological Research Letters,77(1), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiureghian, A. D., & Ang, A. H. (1977). A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,67(4), 1173–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolathayar, S., Sitharam, T. G., & Vipin, K. S. (2012). Spatial variation of seismicity parameters across India and adjoining areas. Natural Hazards,60(3), 1365–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. V., Ellsworth, W. L., & Reasenberg, P. A. (2002). A Brownian model for recurrent earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,92(6), 2233–2250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogi, K. (1968). Sequential occurrences of recent great earthquakes. Journal of Physics of the Earth,16(1), 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosca, I., Console, R., & D’Addezio, G. (2012). Renewal models of seismic recurrence applied to paleoseismological and historical observations. Tectonophysics,564, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murthy, D. N. P., Xie, M., & Jiang, R. (2004). Weibull Models (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, N., & Choudhury, D. (2014). Development of fault and seismicity maps for the state of Goa, India. Disaster Advances,7(6), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • NDMA. (2010). Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. Technical report by National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India

  • Nishenko, S. P., & Buland, R. (1987). A generic recurrence interval distribution for earthquake forecasting. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,77(4), 1382–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawara, M. (1955). Probability of the coming felt earthquake in Tokyo. Quarterly Journal of Seismology.,20, 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, T. (1883). Catalogue of Indian Earthquakes. Memories Geological Survey of India,19, 163–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parvez, I. A., & Ram, A. V. A. D. H. (1999). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards in the Indian subcontinent. Pure and Applied Geophysics,154(1), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasari, S. (2018). Stochastic modelling of earthquake interoccurrence times in Northwest Himalaya and adjoining regions. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk,9(1), 568–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasari, S. (2019). Inverse Gaussian versus lognormal distribution in earthquake forecasting: keys and clues. Journal of Seismology,23, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2014a). Three-parameter generalized exponential distribution in earthquake recurrence interval estimation. Natural Hazards,73(2), 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2014b). Impact of three-parameter Weibull models in probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazards. Pure and Applied Geophysics,171(7), 1251–1281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasari, S., & Dikshit, O. (2015). Distribution of earthquake interevent times in northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure and Applied Geophysics,172(10), 2533–2544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. D., & Choudhury, D. (2018). Prediction of earthquake occurrence for a new nuclear power plant in India using probabilistic models. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions,3(1), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, H. F. (1911). The elastic rebound theory of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Department of Geology, University of Berkeley,6, 413–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikitake, T. (1991). Assessment of earthquake hazard in the Tokyo area, Japan. Tectonophysics,199(1), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikitake, T. (1999). Probability of a great earthquake to recur in the Tokai district, Japan: Reevaluation based on newly-developed paleoseismology, plate tectonics, tsunami study, micro-seismicity and geodetic measurements. Earth, Planets and Space,51(3), 147–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle, J. B., Turcotte, D. L., Shcherbakov, R., Klein, W., & Sammis, C. (2003). Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems. Reviews of Geophysics,41(4), 1019.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). (1995). Vision 2000—A framework for performance based design. Vision 2000 committee, California.

  • Tripathi, J. N. (2006). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in the January 26, 2001 earthquake region of Gujrat, India. Journal of seismology,10(1), 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu, T. (1972a). Large earthquakes near Hokkaido and the expectancy of the occurrence of a large earthquake off Nemuro. Report of the Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction,7, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu, T. (1972b). Aftershocks and earthquake statistics (4): Analyses of the distribution of earthquakes in magnitude, time and space with special consideration to clustering characteristics of earthquake occurrence (2). Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University. Series 7, Geophysics,4(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsu, T. (1984). Estimation of parameters for recurrence models of earthquakes. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute,59, 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R. B. S., Tripathi, J. N., Rastogi, B. K., & Chopra, S. (2008). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake hazard in Gujarat and adjoining region of India. Pure and Applied Geophysics,165(9–10), 1813–1833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R. B. S., Tripathi, J. N., Rastogi, B. K., Das, M. C., & Chopra, S. (2010). Probabilistic assessment of earthquake recurrence in northeast India and adjoining regions. Pure and Applied Geophysics,167(11), 1331–1342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India, for providing financial support through grant number 36(2)/15/04/2016-BRNS/36004-36029 (16BRNS012) to carry out the research work presented in this paper. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and thorough review of this manuscript, which has improved the quality significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, 400076, India

    Vansittee Dilli Rao & Deepankar Choudhury

Authors
  1. Vansittee Dilli Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepankar Choudhury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepankar Choudhury.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, V.D., Choudhury, D. Probabilistic Modelling for Earthquake Forecasting in the Northwestern Part of Haryana State, India. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 3073–3087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02418-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-020-02418-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation