Abstract
Scent-marking is a way for individuals to indirectly communicate; however, the information is not exclusive to a single species and can be informative to a whole community. Prey or competitively inferior species can use scent-marks from predators/dominant species to avoid interactions. Cheetahs are a subordinate member of the large carnivore guild in Africa, yet olfactory communication in this guild has yet to be explored. We explore whether intraguild or intraspecific communication is occurring at cheetah scent-marking sites as well as whether dominant predator avoidance by cheetah occurs in response to predator presence or predator scent-marking. We recorded cheetah behaviour with video recording camera traps at cheetah scent-marking sites where a ‘landscape of fear’ was provided through natural predator presence or manipulated cues of predator presence. We found that cheetah took longer to return to scent-marking sites when a lion or a leopard was the previous species to visit the site. Moreover, cheetah increased the amount of time that they spent sniffing at scent-marking sites when another predator, as opposed to a cheetah, was the previous visitor. Finally, we noted that females never visited a scent-marking site after a predator was present nor when a predators’ scent-mark was present. Our results demonstrate that cheetahs use scent-marking sites for intraspecific communication, but also obtain intraguild information at these sites. Dominant predators can inhibit or at least delay important intraspecific communication around estrous events that occurs between cheetah at scent-marking sites, a novel form of interference competition.
Significance statement
Competition occurs between species, and dominant species deprive subordinate species from key resources. Individuals are able to avoid the cost of direct interactions with competitors by using cues (both direct and indirect) such as scents to assess such risks. Using video recording cameras at cheetah scent-marking sites, we provide novel insight into how dominant predator species shape cheetah behaviour through the use of avoidance by cheetah to the presence of dominant predators. Scent-marking sites are important to cheetah communication around reproduction opportunities and territory maintenance; however, dominant predator species’ cues blocked female reproductive signalling at the sites and delay male visitation. This serves as a novel form of interference competition for cheetah, but we suggest that cheetahs maintain communication through the use of multiple sites.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data will be available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Allen ML, Gunther MS, Wilmers CC (2017) The scent of your enemy is my friend? The acquisition of large carnivore scent by a smaller carnivore. J Ethol 35:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0492-6
Allen ML, Wittmer HU, Houghtaling P, Smith J, Elbroch ML, Wilmers CC (2015) The role of scent marking in mate selection by female pumas (Puma concolor). PLoS One 10:e0139087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139087
Allen ML, Wittmer HU, Wilmers CC (2014) Puma communication behaviours: understanding functional use and variation among sex and age classes. Behaviour 151:819–840. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003173
Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267
Apfelbach R, Blanchard CD, Blanchard RJ, Hayes RA, McGregor IS (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.05.005
Apps P, Rafiq K, McNutt JW (2019) Do carnivores have a world wide web of interspecific scent signals ? In: Buesching CD (ed) Chemical signals in vertebrates 14. Springer, Cham, pp 182–202
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Bissett C, Parker DM, Bernard RTF, Perry TW (2015) Management-induced niche shift? The activity of cheetahs in the presence of lions. Afr J Wildl Res 45:197–203
Broekhuis F, Cozzi G, Valeix M, McNutt JW, MacDonald DW (2013) Risk avoidance in sympatric large carnivores: reactive or predictive? J Anim Ecol 82:1098–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12077
Broekhuis F, Madsen EK, Keiwua K, MacDonald DW (2019) Using GPS collars to investigate the frequency and behavioural outcomes of intraspecific interactions among carnivores: a case study of male cheetahs in the Maasai Mara, Kenya. PLoS One 14:e0213910. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7kk71d0
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (1998) Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretical approach. Springer-Verlag, New York
Bytheway JP, Carthey AJR, Banks PB (2013) Risk vs. reward: how predators and prey respond to aging olfactory cues. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:715–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1494-9
Caro T (1994) Cheetah of the Serengeti Plains: group living in an asocial species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Clements HS, Cumming GS, Kerley GIH (2016) Predators on private land: broad-scale socioeconomic interactions influence large predator management. Ecol Soc 21:45. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08607-210245
Cristescu B, Bernard RTF, Krause J (2013) Partitioning of space, habitat, and timing of activity by large felids in an enclosed South African system. J Ethol 31:285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-013-0376-y
Durant SM (1998) Comparative refuges and coexsistance: an example from Serengeti carnivores. J Anim Ecol 67:370–386. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1998.00202.x
Durant SM (2000a) Predator avoidance, breeding experience and reproductive success in endangered cheetahs, Acinonyx jubatus. Anim Behav 60:121–130
Durant SM (2000b) Living with the enemy: avoidance of hyenas and lions by cheetahs in the Serengeti. Behav Ecol 11:624–632
Eaton RL (1970) Group interactions, spacing and territoriality in cheetahs. Z Tierpsychol 27:481–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1970.tb01882.x
Gosling L (1982) A reassessment of the function of scent marking in territories. Ethology 60:89–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1982.tb00492.x
Harmsen BJ, Sanchez E, Foster RJ (2016) Differential marking behaviour by sympatric felids in a Neotropical forest. CAT News 64:8–12
Haswell PM, Jones KA, Kusak J, Hayward MW (2018) Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators. Oecologia 187:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4133-3
Hayward MW, Slotow R (2009) Temporal partitioning of activity in large African carnivores: tests of multiple hypotheses. S Afr J Wildl Res 39:109–125
Hunter JS, Durant SM, Caro TM (2007a) Patterns of scavenger arrival at cheetah kills in Serengeti National Park Tanzania. Afr J Ecol 45:275–281
Hunter JS, Durant SM, Caro TM (2007b) To flee or not to flee: predator avoidance by cheetahs at kills. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1033–1042
Hunter LTB (1998) The behavioural ecology of reintroduced lions and cheetahs in the Phinda Resource Reserve, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. PhD thesis, University of Pretoria
Kusler A, Jordan NR, McNutt JW, Broekhuis F (2019) Cheetah marking trees: distribution, visitation and behaviour. Afr J Ecol 47:419–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12602
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Laurenson MK (1994) High juvenile mortality in cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) and its consequences for maternal care. J Zool 234:387–408
Li J, Schaller GB, McCarthy TM, WAng D, Jiagong Z, Cai P, Basang L, Lu Z (2013) A communal sign post of snow leopards (Panthera uncia) and other species on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Int J Biodivers 2013:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/370905
Marker LL, Fabiano E, Nghikembua M (2008) The use of remote camera traps to estimate density of free-ranging cheetahs in North-Central Namibia. CAT News 49:22–24
Marneweck C, Jürgens A, Shrader AM (2018) The role of middens in white rhino olfactory communication. Anim Behav 140:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.001
Marnewick KA, Bothma JD, Verdoorn GH (2006) Using camera-trapping to investigate the use of a tree as a scent-marking post by cheetahs in the Thabazimbi district. S Afr J Wildl Res 36:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2028.1972.tb00856.x
Meredith M, Ridout M (2016) Overlap: estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns. R package version 0.3.2, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/overlap/overlap.pdf. Accessed October 2018
Mills MGL, Mills MEJ (2017) Kalahari cheetah. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Monclús R, Rödel HG, von Holst D (2006) Fox odour increases vigilance in European rabbits: a study under semi-natural conditions. Ethology 112:1186–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01275.x
R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org
Rodgers TW, Giacalone J, Heske EJ, Pawlikowski NC, Schooley RL (2015) Communal latrines act as potentially important communication centers in ocelots Leopardus pardalis. Mamm Biol 80:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2015.05.004
Shrader AM, Brown JS, Kerley GIH, Kotler BP (2008) Do free-ranging domestic goats show ‘landscapes of fear’? Patch use in response to habitat features and predator cues. J Arid Environ 72:1811–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.05.004
Somers MJ, Becker P, Druce DJ, Graf J, Gunther M, Marneweck D, Trinkle M, Moleon M, Hayward MW (2017) Reassembly of the large predator guild into Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park. In: Cromsigt JPGM, Archibald S, Owen-Smith N (eds) Conserving Africa’s mega-diversity in the Anthropocene - the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi story. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 286–310
Swanson A, Arnold T, Kosmala M, Forester J, Packer C (2016) In the absence of a “landscape of fear”: how lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist. Ecol Evol 6:8534–8545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2569
Thorsen, S. (2019) Time and date, https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/@996251. Accessed October 2019
Vanak AT, Fortin D, Thaker M, Ogdon M, Owen C, Greatwood S, Slotow R (2013) Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. Ecology 94:2619–2631
Vogt K, Zimmermann F, Kölliker M, Breitenmoser U (2014) Scent-marking behaviour and social dynamics in a wild population of Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx. Behav Process 106:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.04.017
Wachter B, Broekhuis F, Melzheimer J, Horgan J, Chelysheva EV, Marker L, Mills G, Caro T (2018) Behavior and communication of free-ranging cheetahs. Elsevier Inc. In: Marker L, Boast LK, Schmidt-Küntzel A (eds) Cheetahs: biology and conservation. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–134
Walker EH, Nghikembua M, Bibles B, Marker L (2016) Scent-post preference of free-ranging Namibian cheetahs. Glob Ecol Conserv 8:55–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2016.08.007
Wikenros C, Jarnemo A, Frisén M, Kuijper DPJ, Schmidt K (2017) Mesopredator behavioral response to olfactory signals of an apex predator. J Ethol 35:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-016-0504-6
Zöttl M, Lienert R, Clutton-Brock T, Millesi E, Manser MB (2013) The effects of recruitment to direct predator cues on predator responses in meerkats. Behav Ecol 24:198–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars154
Acknowledgments
We thank Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, Phinda Habitat Research Team, Wildlife ACT, and Wayne Cornhill for their help with data collection. We thank the editor T. Stankowich and two anonymous reviewers for their guidance that improved this manuscript. In addition, we thank Joris Cromsigt for the loan of camera traps and Nelson Mandela University for bursary support for KLC.
Funding
Funding was received from a Graduate Research Bursary from the Nelson Mandela University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All institutional, national, and international guidelines for the use of wild animals were followed. Specifically, the Nelson Mandela University Research Ethics Committee: Animal approved all methods used in the study (A16-SCI-ZOO-006). Park management in both HiP (E/5119/02) and Phinda gave consent to conduct this work within their reserves.
Additional information
Communicated by T. Stankowich
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cornhill, K.L., Kerley, G.I.H. Cheetah communication at scent-marking sites can be inhibited or delayed by predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74, 21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-2802-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-2802-9