Symmetry from sectional integrals for convex domains

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aam.2020.102001Get rights and content

Abstract

Let Ω be a bounded convex domain in Rn (n2). In this work, we prove that if there exists an integrable function f such that it's Radon transform over (n1)-dimensional hyperplanes intersecting the domain Ω is a function G depending on the distance to the nearest parallel supporting hyperplane to Ω, then Ω is a ball and f is radial depending on certain assumptions on G. As a consequence we show that constants are not in range of Radon transform of integrable functions in dimension n3.

Introduction

Let Ω be a domain in Rn and f be an integrable function in Ω. We extend f to be identically 0 outside of Ω. Let , denote the usual inner product in Rn. Throughout the article HkG denotes the k-dimensional Hausdorff measure restricted to G, a Borel measurable subset of Rn for 1kn.

The ray transform integrates scalar functions over straight lines. The family of oriented lines can be parametrized by the points on the manifoldTSn1={(x,ξ)Rn×Rn:x,ξ=0,|ξ|=1}Rn×Rn which is the tangent bundle of the unit sphere. The ray transform I of an integrable function f is a function defined on TSn1 asIf(x,ξ)=+f(x+tξ)dt.

The Radon transform integrates the functions over the hyperplanes. The Radon transform R of a function fL1(Ω) is the function defined on Sn1×R byRf(w,p)=Σω,pf(x)dHn1Σω,p where Σw,p={xRn|x,ω=p} denotes the hyperplane with p as the perpendicular distance from the origin and ω is normal to the plane. If|Ω denotes the ray transform of f along all the lines intersecting the domain Ω. Similar definition stands for the notation Rf|Ω. The operators (1.1) and (1.2) have been well studied and has many applications in computer tomography. For more detailed study of the operators I and R we refer [3], [5].

In dimension n=2 both operators I and R coincide. The characterization of range of these operators have been well studied in case of Schwartz class functions S(Rn). It is known that I and R are linear isomorphisms between the Schwartz spaces S(Rn) to S(TSn1) and S(Sn1×R) respectively. Both the operators I and R are injective, i.e., if If=0 imply f=0 and Rf=0 imply f=0.

The question one is interested in is,

Question 1

Are non-zero constant functions in the range of the ray transforms, i.e., does fL1(Ω) such that If|Ω=c(0)?

In [4] the authors showed that in Euclidean spaces of dimension n2, smooth strictly convex domains Ω admitting functions of constant X-ray transform are balls and the function is unique and radial. The function f(x)=χ{|x|<R}πR2|x|2 supported in the ball of radius R centered at the origin of Rn has constant X-ray transform in its support in Rn.

Similarly, one can ask the same question for the Radon transform in dimensions n2.

Question 2

Are non-zero constant functions in the range of Radon transforms in dimension n2, i.e., does fL1(Ω) such that Rf|Ω=c(0)?

We address this question in section 2 and show that one cannot expect constants to be in the range of Radon transform in dimensions n3 by proving the following analogue. If Ω is a bounded convex domain in Rn (n2) and if fL1(Ω) such that Rf|Ω is a function G (see Theorem 2.1 for precise definition) that depends only on the distance to nearest parallel supporting hyperplane to Ω and does not vanish identically on any interval [see Theorem 2.1 for precise definition], then Ω is a ball and f is a unique radial function about the center of Ω.

The proofs utilize the integral moments of the function similar to the case of the ray transform in [4].

Subsequently, as a corollary to the main result in our paper, we obtain the result for the ray transform If|Ω=c(0) in Euclidean space under milder assumptions requiring Ω to be a bounded domain in R2 or a bounded convex domain in Rn for n3. To our knowledge, the main result in Section 2 is completely new. Recently a related result has been proved in [1] that if the Radon transform of a distribution is supported on tangent planes to ∂Ω for a bounded convex domain Ω, then ∂Ω is an ellipsoid.

Remark 1.1

If Ω is bounded convex domain in Rn, any line intersecting Ω intersects ∂Ω at exactly two points. Also if pΩ then there exists at least one supporting (n1)-dimensional hyperplane of Ω passing through p.

Section snippets

Radon transform as a distance function

We begin by stating the main result.

Theorem 2.1

Let, ΩRn be a bounded convex domain (n2) and G:[0,)R be a locally integrable function. If, f:ΩR an integrable function that satisfies,

  • (a)

    Ωf(x)dx=K0.

  • (b)

    For all (n1)-dimensional hyperplanes Σ satisfying Hn1(ΩΣ)>0 and Πj (for, j=1,2) are the pair of supporting (n1)-dim hyperplanes to Ω that are parallel to Σ,ΩΣf(x)dHn1Σ=G(minj=1,2dist(Σ,Πj)).

Then Ω is symmetric about an interior point and f is also symmetric about that point. Furthermore, if G does

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Joonas Ilmavirta for his conference presentation at University of Jyväskylä, Finland which brought our attention to this problem. The authors would also like to thank Venkateswaran P. Krishnan, Sandeep Kunnath and Sivaguru Ravisankar for fruitful discussions and enlightening conversations which helped in improving the results.

References (5)

  • J. Boman

    A hypersurface containing the support of a Radon transform must be an ellipsoid. I

  • H.S.M. Coxeter

    Introduction to Geometry

    (1969)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text