Symmetry from sectional integrals for convex domains
Introduction
Let Ω be a domain in and f be an integrable function in Ω. We extend f to be identically 0 outside of Ω. Let denote the usual inner product in . Throughout the article denotes the k-dimensional Hausdorff measure restricted to G, a Borel measurable subset of for .
The ray transform integrates scalar functions over straight lines. The family of oriented lines can be parametrized by the points on the manifold which is the tangent bundle of the unit sphere. The ray transform I of an integrable function f is a function defined on as
The Radon transform integrates the functions over the hyperplanes. The Radon transform R of a function is the function defined on by where denotes the hyperplane with p as the perpendicular distance from the origin and ω is normal to the plane. denotes the ray transform of f along all the lines intersecting the domain Ω. Similar definition stands for the notation . The operators (1.1) and (1.2) have been well studied and has many applications in computer tomography. For more detailed study of the operators I and R we refer [3], [5].
In dimension both operators I and R coincide. The characterization of range of these operators have been well studied in case of Schwartz class functions . It is known that I and R are linear isomorphisms between the Schwartz spaces to and respectively. Both the operators I and R are injective, i.e., if imply and imply .
The question one is interested in is,
Question 1 Are non-zero constant functions in the range of the ray transforms, i.e., does such that ?
In [4] the authors showed that in Euclidean spaces of dimension , smooth strictly convex domains Ω admitting functions of constant X-ray transform are balls and the function is unique and radial. The function supported in the ball of radius R centered at the origin of has constant X-ray transform in its support in .
Similarly, one can ask the same question for the Radon transform in dimensions .
Question 2 Are non-zero constant functions in the range of Radon transforms in dimension , i.e., does such that ?
We address this question in section 2 and show that one cannot expect constants to be in the range of Radon transform in dimensions by proving the following analogue. If Ω is a bounded convex domain in () and if such that is a function G (see Theorem 2.1 for precise definition) that depends only on the distance to nearest parallel supporting hyperplane to Ω and does not vanish identically on any interval [see Theorem 2.1 for precise definition], then Ω is a ball and f is a unique radial function about the center of Ω.
The proofs utilize the integral moments of the function similar to the case of the ray transform in [4].
Subsequently, as a corollary to the main result in our paper, we obtain the result for the ray transform in Euclidean space under milder assumptions requiring Ω to be a bounded domain in or a bounded convex domain in for . To our knowledge, the main result in Section 2 is completely new. Recently a related result has been proved in [1] that if the Radon transform of a distribution is supported on tangent planes to ∂Ω for a bounded convex domain Ω, then ∂Ω is an ellipsoid. Remark 1.1 If Ω is bounded convex domain in , any line ℓ intersecting Ω intersects ∂Ω at exactly two points. Also if then there exists at least one supporting -dimensional hyperplane of Ω passing through p.
Section snippets
Radon transform as a distance function
We begin by stating the main result.
Theorem 2.1 Let, be a bounded convex domain () and be a locally integrable function. If, an integrable function that satisfies, . For all -dimensional hyperplanes Σ satisfying and (for, ) are the pair of supporting -dim hyperplanes to Ω that are parallel to Σ,
Then Ω is symmetric about an interior point and f is also symmetric about that point. Furthermore, if G does
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Joonas Ilmavirta for his conference presentation at University of Jyväskylä, Finland which brought our attention to this problem. The authors would also like to thank Venkateswaran P. Krishnan, Sandeep Kunnath and Sivaguru Ravisankar for fruitful discussions and enlightening conversations which helped in improving the results.
References (5)
A hypersurface containing the support of a Radon transform must be an ellipsoid. I
Introduction to Geometry
(1969)