Elsevier

Fuel

Volume 266, 15 April 2020, 117089
Fuel

Full Length Article
Effect of different acid-leached USY zeolites on in-situ catalytic upgrading of lignite tar

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117089Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The acid-leached USY zeolites can significantly upgrade in-situ lignite tar.

  • Leached USY with HCl and HNO3 exhibit superior catalytic performance.

  • The yields of naphthalene and methylnaphthalene increase by 7.6 and 6.7 times.

  • Light tar contents are improved by about 47.7% compared with non-upgrading.

Abstract

In this work, USY zeolites obtained by hydrothermal pretreatment were leached by nitric acid (HNO3), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and oxalic acid (H2C2O4), respectively, and used as catalysts to upgrade in-situ lignite tar into light aromatics. The results showed that the acid leaching with HNO3 and HCl removed extra-framework Al of USY, resulting in the decrease of total acid sites but the increase of ratio Brønsted/Lewis acid sites and mesopores volume, which improved catalytic performance and facilitated mass transfer in the reaction. The H2C2O4 leaching dissolved framework Al of USY, leading to a dramatic reduction of acid sites. USY-HCl and USY-HNO3 catalysts exhibited a good performance in the improvement of light aromatics and light tar (boiling point < 360 °C). The promotion of light aromatics, especially the naphthalene homologs, was obvious. The total yields of naphthalene and methylnaphthalene were increased by 7.6 and 6.7 times compared with non-upgrading tar. Light tar contents were also increased by about 47.7% in comparison with non-upgrading tar. This work provides a novel method to upgrade the in-situ lignite tar and generate more light aromatics by optimizing the physicochemical properties of USY zeolites.

Introduction

Lignite with the lowest degree of coalification and high volatiles can be easily converted to tar and gases through pyrolysis technology [1], [2], [3]. However, lignite tar usually contains less light aromatics and high heavy components, which causes various operation problems and limits the subsequent processing [4]. Light aromatics, including benzene, toluene, xylene, naphthalene (BTXN), are very important raw materials in chemical industry. For instance, naphthalene is widely used to produce plasticizers, synthetic fibers and drugs [5]. Therefore, in order to improve the economic value of lignite tar, selective conversion of lignite pyrolysis volatiles into light aromatics through the conversion of heavy components over catalysts is a hot topic [6]. Many materials including char, metal oxides and zeolites are used as catalysts to crack pyrolysis volatiles into light components [7], [8], [9]. Especially, zeolites with regular crystal structure and adjustable acid sites are widely employed to promote the generation of light aromatics in coal tar [10], [11].

Zeolite HY with accessible microspores (0.76 nm) exhibits good catalytic cracking, hydrocracking and isomerization performances [12]. However, its strong acidity and narrow channels of HY zeolite compared with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) easily result in the excessive cracking of coal tar and coke formation [13]. Therefore, various methods are taken to modify zeolite Y for pyrolysis volatiles upgrading and the formation of light aromatics. Li et al. prepared two hierarchical Y zeolites by alkaline treatment with NaOH and NaOH&TBPH, and found the latter showed a better catalytic performance in the cracking of 1,3,5-TIPB [14], which is attributed to its appropriate acidity and mesoporosity, especially moderate Brønsted acid sites and higher B/L ratio. Liu et al. employed four zeolites including NaY, HY, hydrothermal treatment Y (HTY) and hydrothermal treatment-acid leaching Y (HTY-AL) to upgrade coal pyrolysis volatiles [15]. The results presented that HTY and HTY-AL benefited the generation of light aromatics, with the yield of BTEXN increased from 0.78 wt% (raw coal pyrolysis) to 3.63 wt% and 5.31 wt%. The outstanding performance of HTY and HTY-AL correlated with pore structure and appropriate acidity. HCl acid leaching could remove the extra-framework Al of USY zeolite and improve the catalytic activity in the upgrading of heavy oil [16], [17].

Our previous work found that hydrothermal and HNO3 acid treatment obviously affected HY zeolite structure and upgrading of pyrolysis volatiles, but the influences of different acid leaching are not clear. Therefore, this work is aimed to investigate the effect of different acid-leaching (HNO3, HCl and H2C2O4) on the structure of the hydrothermal treated USY and its catalytic performances in in-situ catalytic cracking of the heavy components in lignite pyrolysis volatiles.

Section snippets

Catalysts preparation

Ultra-stable Y zeolite, marked as USY, was prepared by hydrothermal treatment of raw HY (SiO2/Al2O3 = 5.4, Nankai University Catalyst Co., Ltd) at 650 °C for 4 h, which was described in Ref. [18]. Different acid solution (HNO3, HCl and H2C2O4) with 0.8 mol/L was used to leach USY at 40 °C for 4 h (the ratio of acid solution volume to USY zeolite mass is 10 mL/1 g). Thereafter, the solid product was filtrated and washed with deionized water until neutral. The resultant filter cake was dried at

XRD analysis

The effect of different acid leaching on the structure of USY was examined by XRD analysis. As presented in Fig. 1a, compared with USY, the samples by HNO3 and HCl exhibit typical characteristic patterns of zeolite Y, indicating that the FAU framework is retained [23], [24]. However, the diffraction peaks of USY-HNO3 and USY-HCl shift slightly to higher angles, which means that HNO3 and HCl acid leaching results in lattice shrinkage and structural stabilization because the Si-O (0.166 nm) is

Conclusions

The USY was leached by HNO3, HCl and H2C2O4 acid and used as catalysts for in-situ upgrading of lignite tar. Different acid leaching exerted a different effect on the structure, textural properties and the catalytic performances. The acid leaching with HNO3 and HCl resulted in the decrease of total acid sites but the increase of Brønsted acid sites and mesopores volume. The acid leaching with H2C2O4 led to a dramatic reduction of total acid sites and no obvious improvement of textural

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Baoyong Wei: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft. Lijun Jin: Supervision, Funding acquisition. Dechao Wang: Project administration. Yankun Xiong: Investigation. Haoquan Hu: Formal analysis. Zongqing Bai: Resources.

Declaration of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed with the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21878044, U1510101, U1710105), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT18LK10) and the Found of State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion (Grant No. J19-20-301).

References (56)

  • X. Ren et al.

    Increasing light aromatic products during upgrading of lignite pyrolysis vapor over Co-modified HZSM-5

    J Anal Appl Pyrol

    (2018)
  • X. Kong et al.

    Catalytic upgrading of coal gaseous tar over Y-type zeolites

    Fuel

    (2016)
  • W. Li et al.

    Effect of hierarchical porosity and phosphorus modification on the catalytic properties of zeolite Y

    Appl Surf Sci

    (2016)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Catalytic upgrading of volatile from coal pyrolysis over faujasite zeolites

    J Anal Appl Pyrol

    (2018)
  • J.L. Agudelo et al.

    Influence of steam-calcination and acid leaching treatment on the VGO hydrocracking performance of faujasite zeolite

    Fuel Process Technol

    (2015)
  • Z. Qin et al.

    A defect-based strategy for the preparation of mesoporous zeolite Y for high-performance catalytic cracking

    J Catal

    (2013)
  • B. Wei et al.

    Catalytic upgrading of lignite pyrolysis volatiles over modified HY zeolites

    Fuel

    (2020)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    Coupling coal pyrolysis with char gasification in a multi-stage fluidized bed to co-produce high-quality tar and syngas

    Appl Energy

    (2018)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Catalytic conversion of rubber wastes to produce aromatic hydrocarbons over USY zeolites: effect of SiO2/Al2O3 mole ratio

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2019)
  • Peter Adeniyi Alaba et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of hierarchical nanoporous HY zeolites from acid-activated kaolin

    Chin J Catal

    (2015)
  • R. Giudici et al.

    Comparison of nitric and oxalic acid in the dealumination of mordenite

    Appl Catal A-Gen

    (2000)
  • S. Jin et al.

    Hydrogenolysis of glycerol over HY zeolite supported Ru catalysts

    J Energy Chem

    (2014)
  • L. Xiao et al.

    Enhanced performance of HY zeolites by acid wash for glycerol etherification with isobutene

    Appl Catal A-Gen

    (2011)
  • Z. Yan et al.

    On the acid-dealumination of USY zeolite: a solid state NMR investigation

    J Mol Catal A-Chem

    (2003)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    Catalytic pyrolysis of wood polymer composites over hierarchical mesoporous zeolites

    Energy Convers Manage

    (2019)
  • H.W. Lee et al.

    Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of 2-methoxy phenol and dibenzofuran over Pt/mesoporous zeolites

    Energy

    (2015)
  • W. Wang et al.

    Mild-acid-assisted thermal or hydrothermal dealumination of zeolite beta, its regulation to Al distribution and catalytic cracking performance to hydrocarbons

    J Catal

    (2018)
  • N. Brodu et al.

    Role of Lewis acid sites of ZSM-5 zeolite on gaseous ozone abatement

    Chem Eng J

    (2013)
  • Cited by (43)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text