Simultaneous determination of carvacrol and thymol in bee pollen by using a simple and efficient solvent extraction method and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113124Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Thymol and carvacrol were simultaneously analysed in bee pollen by using GC–MS.

  • The proposed sample treatment has shown to be effective (mean recoveries ≥ 90%).

  • Separation was achieved in under 21 min by means of a ZB-Wax column.

  • Matrix did not affect to the MS signals of both compounds.

  • Residues of thymol and carvacrol (LOQ-57 μg/kg) were found in some samples.

Abstract

A novel method is proposed to determine residues of carvacrol and thymol in bee pollen by means of gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. This is an efficient and simple sample treatment (with average analyte recoveries between 90% and 104%) involving solvent extraction with hexane followed by evaporation. There is no need for any additional clean-up step, as the matrix did not affect determination of mass spectrometry for either compound. The chromatographic conditions are also optimized: a ZB-WAX column is employed, helium is the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.1 mL/min, and a temperature program is included, allowing baseline separation of both compounds in less than 21 min. The method is fully validated in terms of selectivity, limits of detection and quantification, matrix effect, linearity, precision and trueness. Results show that not only is it selective, but that it also displays a wide linearity range (limit of quantification-1000 μg/kg), good precision (relative standard deviation values lower than 8%) and sensitivity (limits of detection and quantification lower than 15 μg/kg). Finally, several bee pollen samples are analysed, and thymol and carvacrol residues are found at low concentrations (limit of quantification-57 μg/kg) in some cases.

Introduction

Essential oils are among the natural products that have been used to fight against the Varroa destructor mite, which is considered to be one of the most destructive pests for the honey bee. They represent the preferred alternative by the food industry and consumers rather than synthetic acaricides [1]. In particular, thyme (Thymus vulgaris) oil, which is rich in thymol and carvacrol, widely used in industry as antimicrobial agents [2,3], has been employed by several beekeepers [[4], [5], [6], [7]]. In fact, thymol is currently considered a pesticide by the European Union [8], and both compounds present a broad spectrum of therapeutic activities, such as the anti-bacterial, anti-fungal, anti-parasitic, anti-oxidant, and anti-inflammatory [9,10]. Consequently, it may be surmised that residues of these compounds might accumulate in different bee products (beeswax, honey and bee pollen) after application of essential oil treatment [11]. Moreover, monitoring thymol and carvacrol in bee products could be of interest, not only to verify that thyme oil has been adequately administered, but also to check the potential presence of these bioactive compounds in foods to be consumed by humans. Most studies related to determining thymol and/or carvacrol focused on honey [[4], [5], [6],[12], [13], [14], [15], [16]], with scant consideration being given to other bee products, such as pollen. The latter is attracting particular attention as a functional food/food supplement for human consumption due to its high content of bioactive compounds like essential amino acids, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals and lipids [17]. This is related with a wide range of biological activities, including the anti-fungal, anti-microbial, anti-viral, hypolipidemic, anti-atherosclerotic, anti-inflammatory and cerebrovascular [17]. To the best of our knowledge, in only two surveys were thymol residues reported in bee pollen [18,19], yet no studies are available on determining carvacrol in this matrix. In both studies, a sample preparation based on a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe method (QuEChERS) was used, but no specific data was provided. Moreover, the extraction procedure was taken from a previous study investigating a large number of pesticides in other produce [20]. Once again, no mention was made of thymol and/or carvacrol being included among the pesticides examined or of the proposed methodology being optimized for bee pollen analysis. Thymol and carvacrol were analysed more frequently in other bee related matrices like honey, beeswax or honeybees [[4], [5], [6], [7],12,14,[13], [14], [15], [16],21]. Several sample treatments were employed in these studies: solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, QuEChERS, sorptive extraction and simple extraction in a suitable solvent. These matrices, however, are totally different from bee pollen, and many of the above-mentioned sample treatments could not be easily adapted for this matrix. Therefore, in view of the few publications concerning thymol and carvacrol analysis in bee pollen, and due to our experience in analysing phenolic compounds (resveratrol and piceid isomers) in this matrix [22], we considered appropriate a simple solvent extraction as an alternative to QuEChERS. This is in line with current trends in sample preparation techniques. These focus on simplifying treatment in order to reduce not only costs but also the number/amount of reagents and time, which are among the principles of green analytical chemistry [23]. In addition, according to the related bibliography, the most common technique for determining thymol and carvacrol was gas chromatography (GC) [[4], [5], [6], [7],12,14,15], although liquid chromatography [6,13,16] and electrochemical methods [21] were also employed. Regarding detection systems, some articles reported the use of flame-ionization detectors [4,12,15]; nowadays, however, mass spectrometry (MS) detectors are gaining attention [5,7,14,15]. In our case, analyses were performed in a GC–MS system.

The aim of this study was to propose a specific analytical methodology by means of GC–MS in order to determine simultaneously thymol and carvacrol in bee pollen. We have optimized extraction and determination procedures with the aim of providing good recoveries with the simplest procedure possible, whilst minimizing the potential matrix effect in all cases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which carvacrol has been determined in this matrix, and in which there has been specific development for the simultaneous determination of thymol and carvacrol in bee pollen. Further aims of the study focused on validating the proposed method in accordance with current European legislation, as well as analysing different bee pollen from two Spanish regions (Castilla la Mancha and Galicia).

Section snippets

Reagents and materials

Thymol (Purity > 98.5%) and carvacrol (Purity 98.0%) standards, and ethanol were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chemie Gbmh (Steinheim, Germany). Hexane and acetonitrile were obtained from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). It must be remarked that all solvents used were of analytical grade. A vibromatic mechanical shaker and a drying oven, both supplied by J.P. Selecta S.A. (Barcelona, Spain), a vortex mechanical mixer from Heidolph (Schwabach, Germany), a 5810 R refrigerated bench-top Eppendorf

Optimization of the sample treatment

As mentioned in the Introduction, we decided to use a solvent extraction for sample treatment: The first step of the optimization process was to select the most suitable solvent to extract thymol and carvacrol from the bee pollen. According to the literature regarding thymol and carvacrol determination in other food matrices, especially in plants and essential oils, ethanol, hexane and chloroform were usually selected. [[25], [26], [27], [28], [29]]. We decided, however, to avoid the use of

Conclusions

This is the first time a specific GC–MS based method has been developed, optimized and validated for simultaneously determining thymol and carvacrol in bee pollen. A rapid, simple, and efficient sample treatment based on a solvent extraction with hexane has been proposed. No matrix effect has been found in the case of both analytes, which is an additional advantage of this procedure, as quantification can be performed with reference standards in solvents. Separation has been achieved in under

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish “Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad” and the “Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (Project number RTA2012-00076-C02-02).

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ana M. Ares: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft. María J. Nozal: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Visualization. José L. Bernal: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Visualization. José Bernal: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

Authors thank David Rixham (White Rose English School, Valladolid, Spain) for performing the revision of the English language/grammar of the manuscript. In addition, authors thank E. Pérez and J. Tapia for their technical assistance.

References (31)

  • A. Gałuszka et al.

    The 12 principles of green analytical chemistry and the SIGNIFICANCE mnemonic of green analytical practices

    Trends Analyt. Chem.

    (2013)
  • E.M. Napoli et al.

    Screening of the essential oil composition of wild Sicilian thyme

    Biochem. Syst. Ecol.

    (2010)
  • J. Ivanovic et al.

    The analysis of simultaneous clove/oregano and clove/thyme supercritical extraction

    J. Supercritic. Fluid.

    (2011)
  • V. Rowshan et al.

    Influence of storage conditions on the essential oil composition of Thymus daenensis Celak

    Ind. Crops Prod.

    (2013)
  • R. Requena et al.

    Study of the potential synergistic antibacterial activity of essential oil components using the thiazolyl blue tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

    LWT-Food Sci. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (16)

    • Second-order electrochemical data generation to quantify carvacrol in oregano essential oils

      2022, Food Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The most common CAR determination methods are manly based on chromatographic techniques, such as gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC). For GC, different detection systems were reported, such as flame ionization detector (GC-FID) (Daneshfar et al., 2016; Khajeh et al., 2015; Sereshti et al., 2011; Kiyanpour et al., 2009) and mass spectrometry (GC–MS) (Ghiasvand et al., 2011; Cacho et al., 2015; Jiménez-Salcedo & Tena, 2017; Bernal et al., 2020; Ares et al., 2020). On the other hand, LC coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry or fluorescence detection were also described for the CAR determination (Oller-Ruiz et al., 2017; Viñas et al., 2006).

    • Presence, persistence and distribution of thymol in honeybees and beehive compartments by high resolution mass spectrometry

      2021, Environmental Advances
      Citation Excerpt :

      The determination of this compound is rising in different honeybee products. Ares et al determined residues of carvacrol and thymol in bee pollen by gas chromatography (GC) coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with hexane as a solvent extraction followed by evaporation without clean-up step (Ares et al., 2020), Kasiotis et al analyzed thymol in bees by GC coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) with modified QuEChERS technique (Karasali et al., 2014). Nozal et al analyzed thymol residues from honey and beeswax by GC coupled to flame ionization detector (GC-FID) (Nozal et al., 2002).

    • Highly effective pre-concentration of thymol and carvacrol using nano-sized magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer based on experimental design optimization and their trace determination in summer savoury, Origanum majorana and Origanum vulgare extracts

      2021, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has several applications at low concentration (lower than 1 mM) in (a) cosmetic formulations (b) food (as a preservative against food microorganisms and artificial flavor) (c) foreign drugs due to its preservative properties, and (d) insecticides, fungicides and other chemical products [10]. Thyme, savory, oregano, basil, etc., are the most important sources of thymol [11,12]. Sample preparation techniques are required in environmental and food samples for trace detection of target analytes.

    • Thymol bioactivity: A review focusing on practical applications

      2020, Arabian Journal of Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      For these reasons, the authors suggest suspending treatment for detoxification times for bees, although this could have a lower effect on treatment (Glavan et al., 2020). It is also important to note that traces of thymol have been reported in products related to bees such as honey and pollen but below the threshold that would cause changes in taste and odor (Ares et al., 2020; Tananaki et al., 2014). Similarly, Zolfaghari and Vatanparast (2020) studied the possible toxic effects of thymol on the snail Caucasotachea atrolabiata, evaluating its action on the neuronal activity of the mollusk, and its mechanism of action.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text