Assessment on thermal hazards of reactive chemicals in industry: State of the Art and perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100832Get rights and content

Abstract

Thermal hazards of reactive chemicals have been a major concern due to the unceasing occurrences of fire and explosion accidents in industry. Understanding thermal threats of these chemicals not only contributes to the process safety and sustainability in the research and development (R&D) level, but promotes the efficiency of loss prevention, firefighting and emergency responses. Numerous studies have been conducted towards the comprehensive assessment of thermal hazards of reactive chemicals. The chemicals and methods varied in these studies, and yet some topics were commonly concerned by researchers in relevant fields. Further to say, these topics should also be targeted at when dealing with thermal hazards of new chemicals in future. This article provides an up-to-date overview of the common ground regarding the comprehensive understanding of thermal hazards of reactive chemicals in industry level; whereby, the main limitations and challenges to be faced are explored. The discussed key points include, the classification and reactivity of typical reactive chemicals, the fundamental steps towards the comprehensive understanding of their thermal hazards (including the identification of reaction mechanisms, the calculation of reaction kinetics and thermodynamics, and the characterization of thermal safety properties), and the applicable theoretical, experimental and engineering approaches in each step. The primary goal of this review is to lay out the essential basics that should be focused in every trial to comprehensively understand the thermal hazards of reactive chemicals. The further research directions are also presented based on the current research gaps and the context of Industry 4.0.

Introduction

Due to the boom of modern chemical industry since the 19th century, numerous chemicals have been developed. Chemical substances with potential adverse effects on people, property and environment are generally known as “hazardous materials”. The term of “reactive chemicals” refers to a category of hazardous chemicals initiating chemical reactions by themselves or with other substances [1]. These reactions are often exothermic and can produce flammable gases and/or explosive products to trigger accidents with severe consequences. Reactivity of these chemicals can be driven by friction, shock, electrostatic charge and heat, and so on. Among these factors, thermal related reactivity is of great concern to the fire protection community. A review of 319 major industrial accidents occurred from 1917 to 2011 indicated that, three cases including fire, explosion and toxic release dominated the accidents in industry [2]. Primary cases could have secondary effects. For example, fires were often followed by explosions and vice versa. A large number of fire and explosion accidents have occurred in chemical facilities, plants, warehouses, and industrial parks or during transport, primarily due to the uncontrolled thermal runaway incidents of reactive chemicals [2], [3], [4].

Although the total number of major industrial accidents has been decreasing in recent years [2], fire and explosion incidents and accidents are still of great challenge to the industry communities for their catastrophic consequences once happened. For example, a major fire and explosion accident [5], [6], [7] occurred at a container storage station of Tianjin Port, China in 2015. This accident caused 165 deaths, 798 injuries, over 6 billion financial losses, disastrous influence on community, and severe pollution to the environment. The initial fire and explosion was caused by an overheated container for nitrocellulose (NC), which is an energetic material with spontaneous combustion hazard. A followed-by more dramatic explosion occurred, mainly due to the detonation of 800 tons of ammonium nitrate (AN). Due to a large amount of other reactive chemicals stored in the same area, fires continued to burn uncontrollably and finally led to 8 additional explosions in the industrial park. This accident has drawn high attention from the industry communities due to its dramatic consequences in the contemporary era. It is apparent that the thermal hazards of NC, AN, as well as other reactive chemicals were under-estimated in industrial level, and there was no effective response plan for the potential thermal runaway.

Back to the very beginning, the lack of accurate understanding of thermal hazards of reactive chemicals is a major cause of almost all the fire and explosion accidents in modern industry [8], [9], [10]. Fig. 1 explains how the thermal hazards of reactive chemicals can contribute to thermal runaway incidents and the followed-by fire and explosion accidents under a general chemical application scenario. Apparently, accurate understanding of chemicals is a prerequisite for their sustainable use at the R&D stage. Scientific knowledge of their thermal hazards can also enable the prediction of unfolded consequences if chemicals are exposed to thermal environment, and thus help with emergency response in industrial parks [11]. Note that the inherent property of chemicals and mixtures is not the only factor that contribute to fire and explosion. A thermal runaway process is generally governed by three factors [12], the heat generation due to reaction (influenced by mass of reactive mixture and reactor size), the heat exchange with environment (such as the surface of reactor), and the internal heat and mass transfer (such as the physical state of substances and thermophysical properties).

Many researchers and engineers in fields of chemistry, fire and explosion, process safety and loss prevention need to deal with chemicals containing potential thermal threats constantly. The comprehensive understanding of their thermal threats is a challenging target due to the complex coupling of both inherent property and environment conditions. Numerous studies have been conducted theoretically and/or experimentally to investigate the thermal hazards of the big reactive chemical family. We have analyzed existing studies regarding this topic in the last three decades, and identified the common ground that has been highly focused. Despite the varieties in chemicals and application scenarios, there were some fundamental actions towards the purpose of comprehensive thermal hazard assessment. The thermal reactivity of a chemical must be fully understood through a series of physicochemical parameters. The potential thermal threats of a chemical such as thermal stability, flammability, explosiveness and ignitability (by self-heating or external energy) should be quantitatively characterized. A reactive chemical should also be properly classified on basis of the reactivity phenomena and potential hazards for storage or transport purposes.

To the knowledge of the authors, there is no state-of-the-art review article with regard to the aforementioned actions, which should also be the key points towards the comprehensive understanding of thermal hazards of new chemicals in future. This paper does not intend to target at a particular form of thermal hazard or a certain kind of chemical. The fundamental purpose of this article is to present the issues of interest regarding the common ground with up-to-date discussions, and to provide a guideline for potential users to handle the thermal hazards of a new chemical. Some new perspectives are also presented to fill in the current research gaps. Note that the term of thermal hazard technically differs from thermal risk. The term of risk or the likelihood of harm occurring is introduced when exposure is considered in conjunction with the data of potential hazards [12]. This article mainly focuses on the extensive studies related to the thermal hazards of reactive chemicals; nevertheless some contents of thermal risks are also covered due to the intimate relations between hazard identification and risk assessment in industry. It is expected that this review will provide values to readers in relevant fields by seeing the whole picture, and bring helps to investigate the thermal threats of reactive chemicals in future.

Section snippets

Brief of chemical classifications by different authorities

The classification of chemicals is to analyze the hazard related data of a chemical by deciding whether the chemical should be classified as hazardous, and which kind of hazard is covered by the chemical. Depending on the nature of the hazards, different hazard classes can be defined. For example, flammable solids have physical hazards, and carcinogen can cause health hazards. The identification of hazard class is fundamental to conveniently manage chemicals in industry. When it comes to

Fundamental steps towards the comprehensive assessment of thermal hazards of reactive chemicals

Continuous efforts have been taken by researchers in relevant fields towards the comprehensive understanding of thermal threats of reactive chemicals. Despite the unlimited number of chemicals, the varied thermophysical properties, and their complicated reactivity, the hazard assessment could be summarized as a hierarchical process involving identification, estimation and hierarchization [81]. Learning from hundreds pieces of existing studies in this field, three fundamental steps were

Methodologies and tools for thermal hazard assessment

To conduct the fundamental steps summarized in Section 3, plenty of theoretical and experimental methodologies, as well as engineering tools with specific application purposes have been developed. This section will review some popular methodologies and tools in this field, according to their principles, application scenarios, advantages and challenges.

Final remarks and recommendations for further research

Ultimately, learning from existing studies related to the assessment of thermal hazards of reactive chemicals in the past three decades, this article summarizes the common ground that has been highly focused by researchers in relevant fields, and presents a comprehensive review of current status, challenges, and perspectives of research topics in future. The issues of interest mainly include the classification and thermal characteristics of reactive chemicals, fundamental steps towards the

Declaration of Competing Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51976209, 51806208). The authors greatly acknowledge these supports.

Dr. Qi Sun earned her Ph.D. degree in Safety Science and Engineering in State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, where she worked towards the thermal hazard assessment of typical reactive chemicals as a participant of the National Key R&D Program of China. She did scientific research in pyrolysis modeling of multi-component flame retardant materials at the University of Maryland (College Park), USA, between 2017 and 2018. She is currently working at

References (400)

  • DW Mosley et al.

    Screen reactive chemical hazards early in process development

    Chem Eng Prog

    (2000)
  • EK Mihailidou et al.

    The 319 major industrial accidents since 1917

    Int Rev Chem Eng

    (2012)
  • Y Tadao et al.

    Safety of reactive chemicals and pyrotechnics

  • F. Lees

    Lees’ Loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control

    (2012)
  • YS Chung et al.

    On the August 12, 2015 occurrence of explosions and fires in Tianjin, China, and the atmospheric impact observed in central Korea

    Air Qual Atmos Heal

    (2015)
  • P Huang et al.

    Facts related to August 12, 2015 explosion accident in Tianjin, China

    Process Saf Prog

    (2015)
  • B. Zhao

    Facts and lessons related to the explosion accident in Tianjin Port, China

    Nat Hazards

    (2016)
  • J Sales et al.

    Study of major accidents involving chemical reactive substances analysis and lessons learned

    Process Saf Environ Prot

    (2007)
  • K Kidam et al.

    Technical analysis of accident in chemical process industry and lessons learnt

    Chem Eng Trans

    (2010)
  • S Wu et al.

    Evaluation of thermal hazards for dicumyl peroxide by DSC and VSP2

    J Therm Anal Calorim

    (2008)
  • JM Tseng et al.

    Planning an emergency response centre in southern Taiwan science park

    Process Saf Environ Prot

    (2007)
  • A Kossoy et al.

    An advanced approach to reactivity rating

    J Hazard Mater

    (2005)
  • U Lahl et al.

    REACH-the new European chemicals law

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2006)
  • Committee of experts on the transport of dangerous goods

    Recommendations on the transport of dangerous goods: model regulations

    (2017)
  • Committee of experts on the transport of dangerous goods

    Recommendations on the transport of dangerous goods: manual of tests and criteria

    (2015)
  • Economic Commission for Europe

    Secretariat. Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS)

    (2019)
  • C Wilrich et al.

    Classification of chemicals according to UN-GHS and EU-CLP: a review of physical hazard classes and their intricate interfaces to transport and former EU legislation

    Open Sci J

    (2018)
  • H Wang et al.

    Progress of environmental management and risk assessment of industrial chemicals in China

    Environ Pollut

    (2012)
  • Y-K Chang et al.

    Employee impact and attitude analysis for GHS Implementation in Taiwan

    Ind Health

    (2013)
  • Ta GC, Jonai H, Mokhtar M Bin, Peterson PJ. Model for the implementation of the globally harmonized system of...
  • CM Er et al.

    The evaluation of indoor microbial air quality in two new commissioning higher educational buildings in Johor, Malaysia

    Appl Mech Mater

    (2015)
  • Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee

    European agreement concerning the international carriage of dangerous goods by road

    (2018)
  • U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. Hazard investigation: improving reactive hazard management. US...
  • National Fire Protection Association. Hazardous materials code, NFPA 400. Quincy, MA...
  • C Winder et al.

    Incompatibilities of chemicals

    J Hazard Mater

    (2000)
  • National Fire Protection Association. Standard system for the identification of the hazards of materials for emergency...
  • J Farr et al.

    Expanded chemical reactivity worksheet (CRW4) for determining chemical compatibility, past, present, and future

    Process Saf Prog

    (2017)
  • WL Jorgensen et al.

    CAMEO: a program for the logical prediction of the products of organic reactions

    Pure Appl Chem

    (1990)
  • D Gorman et al.

    Enhanced NOAA chemical reactivity worksheet for determining chemical compatibility

    Process Saf Prog

    (2014)
  • C Wilrich et al.

    UN-GHS-Physical hazard classifications of chemicals: a critical review of combinations of hazard classes

    J Chem Heal Saf

    (2017)
  • JC. Silk

    Development of a globally harmonized system for hazard communication

    Int J Hyg Environ Health

    (2003)
  • E de Jong et al.

    IGUS-50 years of international collaboration to the benefit of safety in the field of unstable substances

    Chem Eng Technol

    (2012)
  • G Marlair et al.

    Safety and security issues relating to low capacity storage of AN-based fertilizers

    J Hazard Mater

    (2005)
  • Z Han et al.

    Ammonium nitrate thermal decomposition with additives

    J Loss Prev Process Ind

    (2015)
  • R Gunawan et al.

    Thermal stability and kinetics of decomposition of ammonium nitrate in the presence of pyrite

    J Hazard Mater

    (2009)
  • S Cagnina et al.

    Modeling chemical incompatibility: ammonium nitrate and sodium salt of dichloroisocyanuric acid as a case study

    Ind Eng Chem Res

    (2014)
  • X-R Li et al.

    Study on the contamination of chlorides in ammonium nitrate

    Process Saf Environ Prot

    (2005)
  • J Sun et al.

    Catalytic effects of inorganic acids on the decomposition of ammonium nitrate

    J Hazard Mater

    (2005)
  • K Kajiyama et al.

    Thermal characteristics of ammonium nitrate, carbon, and copper(II) oxide mixtures

    J Therm Anal Calorim

    (2013)
  • A Miyake et al.

    Thermal decomposition behaviors of ammonium nitrate and carbon mixtures

    Int J Energ Mater Chem Propuls

    (2010)
  • PN Simões et al.

    Study of the decomposition of phase stabilized ammonium nitrate (PSAN) by simultaneous thermal analysis: determination of kinetic parameters

    Thermochim Acta

    (1998)
  • YI Izato et al.

    Combustion characteristics of ammonium nitrate and carbon mixtures based on a thermal decomposition mechanism

    Propellants, Explos Pyrotech

    (2013)
  • AA Vargeese et al.

    Kinetics and mechanism of hydrothermally prepared copper oxide nanorod catalyzed decomposition of ammonium nitrate

    Appl Catal A Gen

    (2012)
  • S Chaturvedi et al.

    Review on thermal decomposition of ammonium nitrate

    J Energ Mater

    (2013)
  • V. Babrauskas

    Explosions of ammonium nitrate fertilizer in storage or transportation are preventable accidents

    J Hazard Mater

    (2016)
  • DE Clark

    Peroxides and peroxide-forming compounds

    Chem Heal Saf

    (2001)
  • YS Duh et al.

    Hazard ratings for organic peroxides

    Process Saf Prog

    (2008)
  • HY Hou et al.

    Exothermic decomposition of cumene hydroperoxide at low temperature conditions

    AIChE J

    (2001)
  • J Lv et al.

    Thermal risk evaluation on decomposition processes for four organic peroxides

    Thermochim Acta

    (2014)
  • S-H Liu et al.

    Thermal hazard evaluation of the autocatalytic reaction of benzoyl peroxide using DSC and TAM III

    Thermochim Acta

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    Dr. Qi Sun earned her Ph.D. degree in Safety Science and Engineering in State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, where she worked towards the thermal hazard assessment of typical reactive chemicals as a participant of the National Key R&D Program of China. She did scientific research in pyrolysis modeling of multi-component flame retardant materials at the University of Maryland (College Park), USA, between 2017 and 2018. She is currently working at School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ningbo University. Her interests lie broadly in topics related to risk assessment and accident analysis, and both experimental and theoretical analysis of thermal hazards of hazardous chemicals in modern industry.

    Dr. Lin Jiang is an associate professor in Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology. He is broadly interested in fire science problems, utilizing combustion, fluid dynamics, and heat and mass transfer theory to solve problems related to flame spread over solid combustibles, material pyrolysis, flammability, and thermal hazards. His above mentioned researches are currently funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation.

    Mi Li received the BS degree in Safety Engineering from Central South University in 2017. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in the State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China. His research interests include the pyrolysis of polymers, combustion of materials, and flame spread of solids.

    Prof. Jinhua Sun is currently a professor in State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China. He received his Ph.D. degree in University of Tokyo (1999), and worked as foreigner research professor at Japan Science and Technology Agency (1999-2002), Vice Director of State Key Laboratory of Fire Science of China (since 2004), Vice-chairman of Asia-Oceania Association for Fire Science and Technology (since 2007), and Director of the International Association for Fire Safety Science (since 2008). He obtained the membership of EU Academy of Sciences in 2018. He specializes in industry safety with areas of, hazardous chemical disaster prediction and prevention, fire risk assessment, fire dynamics, and fire and combustion of new industrial energy. He has published over hundred high-caliber journal/conference papers in the fields of safety, combustion and fire science.

    View full text