Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tracing solute sources and carbon dynamics under various hydrological conditions in a karst river in southwestern China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms that lead various hydrological conditions to influence solute and carbon dynamics in karst rivers is a crucial issue. In this study, high-frequency sampling and analyses of water chemistry and ẟ13CDIC were conducted from October 2013 to September 2014 in a typical karst river, the Beipan River in southwestern China. The major ions (such as Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3, K+, SO42−, Na+, and Cl) in the river are mainly from the weathering of carbonates and silicates and present temporal hydrological variabilities. Sr and U are mainly derived from carbonate weathering and show chemostatic behaviors responding to increasing discharge, similar to carbonate-sourced ions Ca2+, Mg2+, and HCO3. Silicate weathering is the primary source of Al and Li, which show significant dilution effects similar to those of Na+ responding to high discharge. Meanwhile, most dissolved trace elements (such as Zn, Cu, Ba, Sb, Mn, Mo, and Pb) are strongly impacted by anthropogenic overprints and also exhibit a significant seasonal variability, which may be related with mining activities in the investigated area. A simultaneous increase of ẟ13CDIC and decrease in ∆DIC contents and pCO2 values suggests that photosynthesis is the primary control on riverine DIC variability during the high-flow season. Besides, the pCO2 values display significant chemostatic behaviors owing to the influx of biological CO2, which is produced by microbiological activities and ecological processes, and enhanced by monsoonal climatic conditions. A two-dimensional endmember mixing model demonstrates that carbonate weathering (averaging 62%) along with biological carbon (averaging 38%) are main sources to the riverine DIC, with temporal variability. Consequently, these results show that carbonate weathering and involved plant photosynthesis are the dominant processes controlling the riverine DIC contents under high discharge and temperature conditions. This work provides insight into the crucial influence of hydrological variability on solute sources and carbon dynamics under monsoonal climate for the karst rivers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We deeply thank Dr. Si-Liang Li and Dr. Jun Zhong for their valuable comments that have largely improved the scientific writing of this paper, Dr. Fu-Jun Yue and Dr. Zhong-Jun Wang for their help in the field sampling, and the International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41807366), Guizhou Science and Technology Department Fund (Grant No. [2019]1043), Guizhou Education Department Fund (Grant No. [2018]161), and scientific platform talent project of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (Grant No. [2018]5774-029).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Liu.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Calculation of silicate and carbonate weathering fluxes:

The fluxes of silicate weathering (Fsil) and carbonate weathering (Fcarb) were calculated as follows:

$$ {F}_{\mathrm{sil}}=\left({\left[\mathrm{K}\right]}_{\mathrm{sil}}\times {M}_{\mathrm{k}}+{\left[\mathrm{Na}\right]}_{\mathrm{sil}}\times {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{Na}}+{\left[\mathrm{Ca}\right]}_{\mathrm{sil}}\times {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{Ca}}+{\left[\mathrm{Mg}\right]}_{\mathrm{sil}}\times {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{M}\mathrm{g}}+{\left[\mathrm{Si}\right]}_{\mathrm{sil}}\times {\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{SiO}2}\right)\times \mathrm{Discharge} $$
(7)
$$ {F}_{\mathrm{carb}}=\left({\left[\mathrm{Ca}\right]}_{\mathrm{carb}}\times {M}_{\mathrm{Ca}}+{\left[\mathrm{Mg}\right]}_{\mathrm{carb}}\times {M}_{\mathrm{Mg}}\right)\times \mathrm{Discharge} $$
(8)

where M is the molar mass of the element.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Chen, B., Xu, ZY. et al. Tracing solute sources and carbon dynamics under various hydrological conditions in a karst river in southwestern China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 11375–11386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07650-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07650-6

Keywords

Navigation