Potential high-Tc superconductivity in ZrB2 polymorph under pressure
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Since the discovery of the superconductivity of MgB2 (Tc = 39 K) [1] in the AlB2 structure (P6/mmm), considerable efforts [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] have been devoted to searching for new superconductors in related compounds with a structure and chemistry similar to that of MgB2. Particularly some d-type transition-metal diborides (TMB2) [4], which are claimed to combine average coupling constants with comparable phonon frequencies to those of MgB2. The first superconductors reported in TMB2 compounds were NbB2 and MoB2, whose experimentally determined superconductivity critical temperatures were 3.87 and 7.45 K [13], respectively. Gasparov et al. [14] reported an experimentally observed superconducting transition of polycrystalline ZrB2 compounds with Tc = 5.5 K. However, these observations could not be confirmed in later studies [15], [16], [17]. Experimental studies [15], [18], [19] predicted that the occurrence of superconductivity is derived from the nonstoichiometry in TMB2 compounds. Similar situations apply for TaB2 and BeB2 compounds, whose superconductivity critical temperatures were experimentally determined to be 9.5 [20] and 0.7 K [21], respectively. However, the follow-up studies had reached contradictory conclusions [6], [22], [23]. In summary, to date, there is no clear proof of superconductivity that could be established for the majority of TMB2 materials.
Numerous studies concentrating on electronic structure [5], [24], [25], bond iconicity [26], Fermi surface [27], phonon spectra [28], and electron–phonon interaction [4], [6], [16] were performed to offer theoretical explanations for the lack of superconductivity in these TMB2 materials. Several important aspects affecting the superconductivity of TMB2 materials are summarized: (1) strong covalent interactions between boron and metal layers are enabled by the presence of d-electrons on metal; and (2) electron–phonon interaction plays an essential role in the occurrence of superconductivity for TMB2 materials, whose electron–phonon interaction is fairly weak.
In general, pressure can effectively shorten the interatomic distance of materials, and consequently, significantly alter their electronic bonding states to modify the physical properties and/or induce the formation of new physical states. Experimental and theoretical research [29], [30], [31], [32], [33] confirmed that pressure can effectively regulate the phonon frequency and tune the electron–phonon coupling (EPC) in various materials. Therefore, pressure may be a promising method to acquire new superconductors or alter the superconducting properties of materials. In the case of ZrB2, experimental compression up to 50 GPa revealed no obvious phase transition [34]. The theoretical research performed by Ma et al. [35] found no high-pressure phase transitions up to 300 GPa. Two new ZrB2 structures were proposed by Pan et al. [36], but no superconductivity was reported.
As an exploratory study, extensive particle swarm optimization (PSO) structural searches up to 500 GPa were performed to uncover the high-pressure structures of ZrB2. Three novel ZrB2 structures were predicted in combination with the first-principle calculations. The structural characteristics, stability, electronic structure, electron–phonon interaction, and superconductivity under different pressure conditions were systematically investigated.
Section snippets
Computational methods
The well-developed CALYPSO code [37] was carried out to search for the new ZrB2 structures. This code is based on PSO, with simulation cell sizes of 1–4 formula units (f.u.) at 0, 200, 400, and 600 GPa, respectively. CALYPSO is designed to predict metastable or stable structures only knowing the chemical composition of a given compound at certain external conditions [38], [39], [40], [41].
The structural relaxation and total–energy calculation were carried out using the density functional theory
Structural features and stability
Our simulations indicate that the stable structure for ZrB2 is definitely the AlB2-type crystalline structure (P6/mmm space group, No.191), which is consistent with experimental results [49]. Hereafter, the crystalline structure is denoted as AlB2–ZrB2. Besides the lowest energy structures, two new structures with energies approximately 60 meV/atom higher than those of the AlB2–ZrB2 structure are obtained at normal pressure. These two predicted ZrB2 structures are tetragonal and isostructural
Conclusion
In conclusion, various ZrB2 compounds were systematically investigated on the basis of the PSO algorithm combined with first-principle calculations. Three metastable phases, namely, I41/amd-ZrB2, P42/mmc-ZrB2, and P4/nmm-ZrB2 were proposed. The I41/amd-ZrB2 and P42/mmc-ZrB2 phases could be stable at ambient pressure with the mechanical properties comparable to that of AlB2-ZrB2. The P4/nmm-ZrB2 phase was predicted to be stable above 20 GPa and energetically favored relative to the
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Feifei Ling: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Lingjuan Hao: Data curation, Software, Methodology. Kun Luo: Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis. Zhikang Yuan: Supervision, Investigation, Formal analysis. Yufei Gao: Supervision, Formal analysis. Qi Gao: Software, Validation, Writing - original draft. Yingmei Li: Software, Validation, Writing - original draft. Zhisheng Zhao: Software, Methodology. Yang Zhang: Formal
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51772263 and 51072174).
References (57)
- et al.
Structure and superconductivity in Zr-stabilized, nonstoichiometric molybdenum diboride
Phys. C: Superconductivity
(2002) - et al.
The NbB2-phase revisited: homogeneity range, defect structure, superconductivity
Acta Mater.
(2005) Absence of superconductivity in BeB2
Phys. C
(2001)- et al.
ZrB2: adjusting the phase structure to improve the brittle fracture and electronic properties
Ceram. Int.
(2017) - et al.
Interface structure prediction via CALYPSO method
Sci. Bull.
(2019) - et al.
CALYPSO: a method for crystal structure prediction
Comput. Phys. Commun.
(2012) - et al.
First principles phonon calculations in materials science
Scr. Mater.
(2015) - et al.
Modeling hardness of polycrystalline materials and bulk metallic glasses
Intermetallics
(2011) - et al.
Prediction of Li2B novel phases and superconductivity under varying pressures
Comput. Mater. Sci.
(2019) Superconductivity—a source of surprises
Solid State Sci.
(2005)
Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride
Nature
Phonon dispersion and electron-phonon coupling in MgB2 and AlB2
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Superconductivity of metallic boron in MgB2
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Lattice dynamics and electron-phonon coupling in transition-metal diborides
Phys. Rev. B
Band structure and properties of superconducting MgB2 and related compounds (a review)
Phys. Solid State
Theoretical study of electron-phonon interaction in ZrB2 and TaB2
Phys. Rev. B
Superconducting properties of MgB2 from first principles
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Superconducting and normal-state properties of the layered boride OsB2
Phys. Rev. B
Absence of superconductivity in the high-pressure polymorph of MgB2
Phys. Rev. B
Evidence of multiband behavior in the superconducting alloy Zr0.96V0.04B2
Phys. Rev. B
Phonon anomalies predict superconducting Tc for AlB2-type structures
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
Doping-induced superconductivity of ZrB2 and HfB2
Phys. Rev. B
Superconductivity: the transition temperature peak below four electrons per atom
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Electron transport in diborides: observation of superconductivity in ZrB2
J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett.
Two-gap superconductivity in ZrB12: temperature dependence of critical magnetic fields in single crystals
Phys. Rev. B
Why HfB2 is not superconductor
J. Supercond. Novel Magn.
Absence of superconductivity in NbB
Phys. Rev. Mater.
Cited by (5)
Study on the bonding properties of ZrB<inf>2</inf> (0001)/ZrC (111) interface via first-principles calculations
2021, Materials Chemistry and PhysicsClathrate-Like Alkali and Alkaline-Earth Metal Borides: A New Family of Superconductors with Superior Hardness
2023, Advanced Functional MaterialsMechanical properties and multifunctionality of AlB<inf>2</inf>-type transition metal diborides
2023, Journal of Physics Condensed MatterEpitaxial Growth of Magnetron-Sputtered ZrB<inf>2</inf> Films on Si(100) Substrates
2022, Physica Status Solidi (A) Applications and Materials ScienceFirst-principles study on the superconductivity of doped zirconium diborides
2022, Physical Review Materials