Abstract
P63 is a major transcription factor regulating skin development and homeostasis. It controls many genes involved in cell proliferation, adhesion, and early differentiation. P63 is mutated in several rare syndromes called p63-related ectodermal dysplasia syndromes (ED). The main forms are EEC and AEC syndromes due to p63 missense mutations on the DBD and SAM domains, respectively. ED patients display many developmental defects, including ectrodactyly, clef/lip palate, and ectodermal dysplasia, while AEC patients suffer from severe skin erosions that not always heal. We have previously showed that ED-derived iPSC display altered epidermal commitment. P63 belongs to the p53 gene family sharing similar structural domains. We found that ED-iPSC epidermal commitment can be rescued by a p53-reactivating compounds called PRIMA-1MET, also named APR-246 and currently used in anticancer clinical trials. Here, we established primary epidermal culture from two AEC children (S.F. and Y.M.) suffering from persistent skin erosions at age of 9 and 15, respectively. These patients carry missense mutations on the SAM domain (I576T and I537T). We found that primary keratinocytes (KCs) isolated from these AEC patients underwent altered epidermal differentiation that was rescued by PRIMA-1MET treatment. It prompted us to formulate the compound onto a cream that was topically applied on the right hand of one patient and on the scalp of the second patient. In both cases, the daily treatment allowed re-epithelialization of the eroded skin and a drastic loss of pain after few weeks, improving quality of life. Normally, mutant p63 exerts a dominant-negative effect, mainly through the formation of aggregate with WT p63 and p73. PRIMA-1MET did not reduce protein aggregation while enhancing cell differentiation, suggesting that PRIMA-1MET targets cell differentiation and not p63 activity directly. In conclusion, we propose that repurposing of the antitumoral PRIMA-1MET compound could become a general treatment of AEC skin erosions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
TP63, member of the P53 gene family, encodes for P63 protein, a master regulator of embryonic steps of epithelial development. P63 is essential for epithelial homeostasis, mainly controlling the proliferative potential of epidermal stem cells and the stratification of epithelial structures1,2,3. Deletion of p63 in mice results in the complete absence of stratified epithelia in organs, such as the epidermis, breast, prostate, and bladder4,5,6. Heterozygous missense mutations in TP63 gene are associated to P63-related ectodermal dysplasia (ED). Two overlapping phenotypes are more frequent: 1/ankyloblepharon-ectodermal dysplasia-clefting syndrome (AEC, MIM 106260), characterized by ectodermal dysplasia, including alopecia, scalp erosions, dystrophic nails, hypodontia, ankyloblepharon, and cleft lip and/or cleft palate; 2/ectrodactyly-ectodermal dysplasia-cleft lip/palate (EEC, MIM 604292), which differs from AEC by the ectrodactyly and absence of scalp erosions. A certain degree of genotype-to-phenotype correlation is reported. EEC mutations are clustered in the DNA-binding domain, while AEC mutations are found in the sterile α-motif or transactivation-inhibitory domain7. Consistent with the dominant inheritance pattern, there is an agreement that these mutations have a dominant-negative effect by interfering with p63 DNA binding8.
While there is no curative treatment, care and follow-up of AEC and EEC patients are challenging and require multidisciplinary and expert, surgical, and medical teams for the clefting surgery, hearing aid, and ocular long-term follow-up. For that purposes, skin integrity is mandatory. For example, scalp erosions frequently interfere and delayed surgery. While spontaneous skin healing occurs within the first 2 years of life, in a number of patients, skin erosions extended to the back, the palms and soles and persist beyond 2 years. By the use of EEC/AEC-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), we have previously shown that ED-iPSC displayed altered epidermal commitment that can be rescued by a P53-reactivating compounds called PRIMA-1MET, also named APR-246 and successfully tested in antitumor clinical trials9,10 (https://www.aprea.com/pipeline/apr-246/). Here, we show the significative improvement of chronic skin erosions in two AEC patients by topical use of PRIMA-1MET.
Results and discussion
Phenotype and genotype description of AEC patients
Patient 1 is a 9-year-old daughter of healthy non-consanguineous parents. She was referred at birth for cleft lip and palate and scalp erosions. Pregnancy and delivery were uneventful. AEC syndrome was confirmed by the identification of a missense mutation in the SAM domain of TP63 gene (c.1727T > C; p.Ile576Thr) (Fig. 1a). Few months after birth, she developed bilateral and painful erosions of the palms and soles that never completely healed. For 9 years, several therapeutic attempts were proposed, based on specific dressings and topical preparations and opiate analgesics. Skin grafting was discussed. Painful retraction of the fingers and sole involvement impact fine motor skills (writing, drawing, clothing…) and walking, respectively.
Patient 2 is a 15-year-old female patient born to healthy non-consanguineous parents. AEC syndrome was confirmed by the identification of a missense mutation in the SAM domain of TP63 gene c.1610T > C, p.Ile537Thr. She presented at birth with cleft of the palate and ankyloblepharon. She had abnormal nail and teeth, and superficial recurrent erosions of the fingers. Since birth, she presented with complete aplasia cutis of the scalp responsible for chronic anemia. Despite all medical efforts, scalp aplasia never healed and gradually spread to the forehead and ears. She was treated by daily dressings. She received paracetamol before and after the dressing. Pain comparison with visual analog scale was measured at 6 during the dressings.
Establishment of primary AEC epidermal cell lines and epidermal differentiation
Biopsy was undertaken from on nonerosive region of the skin in patient 1. Primary epidermal culture was established and amplified. No difference was observed between WT and AEC KCs proliferation or cell death (not shown). Stratification/differentiation was induced by raising calcium concentration of the medium to 1.5 mM. Cells were maintained for 10 days, and both gene and protein expression for specific differentiated epidermal markers were performed, respectively, by qRT-PCR and immunostaining analysis. Expression of cytokeratin 1 (KRT1), ZNF750, transglutaminase (TGM1), loricrin (LOR) and small proline-rich protein 1A (SPRRA1) genes were reduced in AEC keratinocytes (KCs) of patient 1 as compared with wild-type (WT) KCs (Fig. 1c). It suggests a delayed or altered epidermal differentiation in patient cells. Except for cornified markers (LOR and SPRRA1), the expression of these genes was restored by PRIMA-1MET. Accordingly, patient 1 differentiated KCs displayed by immunofluorescence staining reduced nuclear ZNF750, pericellular transglutaminase, and cytoplasmic KRT1, as compared with normal KCs (Fig. 1d). Remarkably, in the presence of PRIMA-1MET, these markers were efficiently rescued in AEC KCs at day 10 (Fig. 1d). This strongly suggests that PRIMA-1MET efficiently rescued AEC cell differentiation. Of interest, while KRT1, transglutaminase, and ZNF750 were profoundly altered in AEC-differentiated KCs, involucrin (IVL) was normally expressed (Fig. 1c, d). It has been shown that involucrin does not behave like the other skin markers in wound and in psoriasis11,12. It would be interesting to study this difference in the context of AEC.
p63 aggregation is not reduced by PRIMA-1MET
Mutant AEC p63 exerts a dominant-negative effect, mainly through the formation of aggregates with WT p63 and also with the p53 family member p7313. We tested whether PRIMA-1MET rescue could be due to reduction of protein aggregation. Untreated and treated mutant and WT epidermal cells were lysed in native conditions for total protein extraction. Protein extracts were then loaded on a non-denaturing gel followed by transfer for western blot analysis with an anti-p63-specific antibody. Protein aggregation was detected in AEC-differentiated cells and not in WT cells, as expected. However, while PRIMA-1MET was able to rescue epidermal differentiation and corresponding specific gene expression, it did not abolish protein aggregation driven by the mutant p63 molecule (Fig. 2). This is in contrast with its disaggregation activity on mutant p5314. It strongly suggests that PRIMA-1MET targets epidermal cell differentiation, but not p63 activity. This could suggest a more general effect of this small molecule on defective wound healing, like in keloids, leg ulcers, or diabetic ulcers.
Improvement of epidermal covering
On the basis of the in vitro results and the ongoing phase II PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 trials, we were authorized by the French Agency for Health and Drugs (ANSM) to administrate PRIMA-1MET to two patients under the responsibility of the dermatologist and the pharmacist. PRIMA-1MET was formulated onto a cream (see the Materials and methods section for compound formulation), and first applied topically on the skin of Balb/C mice for 1 week without any sign of irritation or cytotoxicity (not shown). After informed consent, patient 1 received 5 mg daily of PRIMA-1MET in SERAQUA vehicle on skin erosions. Right palm was treated daily, while the left palm was treated with the vehicle alone. After 11 weeks, the daily treatment allowed re-epithelialization of the skin erosions and a drastic improvement of pain, leading to stop painkillers (Fig. 3). At week 33, epidermalization was almost complete, but not fully cornified (Fig. 3).
Based on these achievements, a biopsy was undertaken from a on nonerosive region of the skin in patient 2, suffering from an entire scalp erosion (Fig. 4a). As observed with KCs from patient 1, KCs from patient 2 displayed similar epidermal stratification/differentiation alteration that was rescued by PRIMA-1MET (Fig. 4b). Then, patient 2 was treated on the entire scalp erosion. Improvement of the scalp erosion was already observed after 5 weeks of topical treatment (Fig. 4c). Within the first 3 weeks, oozing decreased. Epidermal growth was seen with normal skin in some areas that progressively merge. At week 32, the scalp was largely recovered (Fig. 4c), and dressings became easier and painkillers have been stopped. Interestingly, patient 2 gained weight (+6 kg within 3 months) and height (+4 cm during the same period). Particularly remarkable, the peripheric scalp is completely re-epidermized. Still the epidermal covering is not fully cornified, which fits with the absence of rescue of cornified specific markers, such as LOR and SPRRA1. This suggests that PRIMA-1MET could enhance mainly early epidermal differentiation.
The localization of skin erosions in AEC patients could differ among patients, even with the same mutation on the SAM domain. Moreover, the erosion is always restricted to a well-defined area (see Fig. 4a), and skin biopsy in healthy area heals normally in AEC patients. There is no explanation for this puzzled fact. It is known that dermal fibroblasts are a heterogeneous cell population over the body, and they originate from different embryonic precursors. In addition, some skin areas contain more or less sweat and sebaceous glands, as well as particular ion (sodium, calcium) channels that could encounter for these differences. Finding the molecular basis for such restricted and variable insults among AEC patients would help to prevent such painful and disabiliting skin erosions. We showed that repurposing of PRIMA-1MET, a small compound identified as p53-reactivating drug to induce cell apoptosis of human cancer cells carrying a p53 mutation, could become an efficient treatment for local AEC erosions reported in patients with AEC syndrome. In addition, such treatment might improve wound healing. It might help the multidisciplinary teams to propose appropriate and early care that are limited by the lesions, i.e., clefting surgery, hearing aids. Chronic pain might be avoided. Finally, it improves quality of life and social networking in AEC patients. It remains to test whether PRIMA-1MET must be applied permanently or temporary and to clarify the mechanism of action of PRIMA-1MET on differentiated KCs.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and epidermal differentiation
Skin biopsies of 4 mm were taken from the back arm of patients 1 and 2 after family consent and authorization from the French Committed of Person protection (CPP). Primary KCs were extracted and amplified as described previously15. By raising calcium concentration to 1.5 mM at confluency, KCs underwent stratification/differentiation for 10 days. Cells were treated with 30 μM of PRIMA-1MET dissolved in keratinocyte medium 2 days before induction of differentiation and during the whole period of treatment, with change of medium every 2 days.
Formulation of PRIMA-1MET
Since i.v. injections of PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 were well tolerated in previous clinical cancer trials (phase 2 and 3), the French agency for health and drugs (ANSM) gave us the authorization to treat by topical dermal application two AEC patients with severe skin erosions as a compassionate care, under the responsibility of the dermatologist and the pharmacist. Quality control of PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 pure powder (R&D Systems, Bio-Techne, France) was assessed by appropriate assays. No impurities were found beyond the recommended thresholds of the ICH Q3A, Q3C, and Q3D guidelines. PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 powder was dissolved in sterile purified water (Versylene®, Fresenius Kabi, France) to obtain a solution at 36 mg/mL. This solution was then incorporated and mixed in the ready-to-use Seraqua® hydrophilic topical cream base (Fagron, France) to obtain PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 concentration at 0.6 mg/g of cream. Stability of PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 in this formulation was demonstrated for 3 weeks when stored at 2–8 °C.
qRT-PCR analyses
Untreated and treated AEC and control KCs were harvested as a dry pellet. RNA was then extracted using RNEasy Mini kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of RNA using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicate using 2× SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Absource Biotools). Expression of each gene was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method. The results are presented as fold change normalized to B2M house-keeping gene and relative to control KCs. Specific primer sequences used are
KRT14: 5′-GGCCTGCTGAGATCAAAGACTAC-3′ (up) and 5′-CACTGTGGCTGTGAGAATCTTGTT-3′ (down)
KRT1: 5′-TCTCGGTTGGATTCGGAACTGAAG-3’ (up) and 5′-AGACAACTCTGCTTGGTAGAGTGC-3′ (down)
ZNF750: 5′-CAGGTACTGCTTCCTGAGCAC-3′ (up) and 5′-GAGAGCCTCCGTCATCTGG-3′ (down)
TGM1: 5′-CCCCCGCAATGAGATCTACA-3′ (up) and 5′-ATCCTCATGGTCCACGTACACA-3′ (down)
ILV: 5′-TCTGCCTCAGCCTTACTGTG-3′ (up) and 5′-CAGTGGAGTTGGCTGTTTCA-3′ (down)
B2M: 5′-CCACTGAAAAAGATGAGTATGCCT-3′ (up) and 5′-CCAATCCAAATGCGGCATCTTCA-3′ (down).
Immunofluorescence staining
Cells were seeded on 0.1% gelatin-coated coverslips in a 24-well plate at 5400 cells per well. They were fixed after 10 days of differentiation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature, incubated for 10 min in glycine 1 mM to quench PFA and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in DPBS+/+ (Gibco™, Life Technologies) for 7 min with 3 × 5 min of washing in DPBS+/+ between each step. After blocking in 5% BSA for 30 min, cells were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C in a humidified chamber. Primary antibodies used were against CKRT1 (1/250, BioLegend), ZNF750 (HPA023012, 1/300, Sigma Aldrich), TGM1 (sc-25786, 1/50, Santacruz), and IVL (I9018, 1/100, Sigma). Cells were washed in DPBS+/+ and incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies (goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor® 488 or goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor® 594, Life Technologies) diluted at 1/3000 in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature protected from light. Coverslips were finally washed, mounted on microscope slides (DAPI fluoromount-G™, Electron Microscopy Sciences), and visualized under a Nikon Eclipse Ti epifluorescence microscope equipped with an OrcaFlash 4.0 LT camera (Hamamatsu). Picture analyses were conducted using NIS-Elements software.
Protein aggregation tests
In total, 5 × 105 AEC and control KCs were seeded in six-well plates. As they became 70% confluent, they were treated with 30 μM PRIMA-1MET, or the vehicle as control, replacing the culture medium with the compound every 48 h until the harvesting. At 100% of confluence, cells underwent differentiation by raising calcium concentration of the medium to 1.5 mM. After 10 days of differentiation, cells were lysed in native lysis buffer (25 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM CHAPS, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitors) and incubated for 1 h on ice in the presence of benzonase (Merck Millipore). Protein extracts were loaded on 3–12% Novex Bis-Tris gradient gel for BN-PAGE (Life Technologies) in 20% glycerol and 5 mM Coomassie, and analyzed by western blotting using p63-specific antibody (anti-p63EPR5701, ab124762, Abcam). Relative quantification of protein band intensity was performed using Image Lab Software (Bio-Rad).
References
Melino, G., Memmi, E. M., Pelicci, P. G. & Bernassola, F. Maintaining epithelial stemness with p63. Sci. Signal. 8, re9 (2015).
Vanbokhoven, H., Melino, G., Candi, E. & Declercq, W. p63, a story of mice and men. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 1196–1207 (2011).
Shalom-Feuerstein, R. et al. ΔNp63 is an ectodermal gatekeeper of epidermal morphogenesis. Cell Death Differ. 18, 887–896 (2011).
Barbieri, C. E. & Pietenpol, J. A. p63 and epithelial biology. Exp. Cell Res. 312, 695–706 (2006).
Pignon, J. C. et al. p63-expressing cells are the stem cells of developing prostate, bladder, and colorectal epithelia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8105–8110 (2013).
Senoo, M., Pinto, F., Crum, C. P. & McKeon, F. p63 Is essential for the proliferative potential of stem cells in stratified epithelia. Cell 129, 523–536 (2007).
Rinne, T., Brunner, H. G. & van Bokhoven, H. p63-associated disorders. Cell Cycle 6, 262–268 (2007).
Browne, G. et al. Differential altered stability and transcriptional activity of ΔNp63 mutants in distinct ectodermal dysplasias. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2200–2207 (2011).
Shalom-Feuerstein, R. et al. Impaired epithelial differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells from ectodermal dysplasia-related patients is rescued by the small compound APR-246/PRIMA-1MET. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2152–2156 (2013).
Zhou, H. & Aberdam, D. A step closer toward therapies for p63-related disorders. Rare Dis. 1, e24247 (2013).
Mathay, C. et al. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor is induced by disruption of lipid rafts and oxidative stress in keratinocytes and participates in the epidermal response to cutaneous wounds. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 717–727 (2008).
Watanabe, S., Wagatsuma, K., Ichikawa, E. & Takahashi, H. Abnormal distribution of epidermal protein antigens in psoriatic epidermis. J. Dermatol. 18, 143–151 (1991).
Russo, C. et al. Protein aggregation of the p63 transcription factor underlies severe skin fragility in AEC syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E906–E915 (2018).
Rangel, L. P. et al. p53 reactivation with induction of massive apoptosis-1 (PRIMA-1) inhibits amyloid aggregation of mutant p53 in cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 3670–3682 (2019).
Warshauer, E. et al. RBM28, a protein deficient in ANE syndrome, regulates hair follicle growth via miR-203 and p63. Exp. Dermatol. 24, 618–622 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the patients and families for their cooperation and trust. This work was supported by grants from ANR-PRTS, ANR-Emergence, Société Française de Dermatologie 2016 and Institut National pour la Santé Et la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) for DA and from Telethon (GGP16235) for C.M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.A. conducted most of the in vitro experiments, including the establishment and differentiation of epidermal cell culture from patient skin biopsies. L.N.R. participated to the establishment and differentiation of epidermal cell culture from patient 2 skin biopsy. P.H.S., S.C., and J.S. performed the analysis of the quality of PRIMA-1MET/APR-246 powder, its formulation, and assessed its chemical stability in topical cream for skin application. F.B. and F.M.-P. took care of patient 2. S.S. and C.M. did p63 aggregation analysis on differentiated patient cells. C.B. analyzed the results and edited the paper. D.A. and S.H.R. conceived the idea of the project, analyzed the results, and wrote the paper. All authors approved the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Edited by G. Melino
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aberdam, E., Roux, L.N., Secrétan, PH. et al. Improvement of epidermal covering on AEC patients with severe skin erosions by PRIMA-1MET/APR-246. Cell Death Dis 11, 30 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2223-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2223-8