Skip to main content
Log in

Design and analysis of the rotational binary graph as an alternative to hypercube and Torus

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Network cost is equal to degree × diameter and is one of the important measurements when evaluating graphs. Torus and hypercube are very well-known graphs. When these graphs expand, a Torus has an advantage in that its degree does not increase. A hypercube has a shorter diameter than that of other graphs, because when the graph expands, the diameter increases by 1. Hypercube Qn has 2n nodes, and its diameter is n. We propose the rotational binary graph (RBG), which has the advantages of both hypercube and Torus. RBGn has 2n nodes and a degree of 4. The diameter of RBGn would be 1.5n + 1. In this paper, we first examine the topology properties of RBG. Second, we construct a binary spanning tree in RBG. Third, we compare other graphs to RBG considering network cost specifically. Fourth, we suggest a broadcast algorithm with a time complexity of 2n − 2. Finally, we prove that RBGn embedded into hypercube Qn results in dilation n, and expansion 1, and congestion 7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mokhtar H, Zhou S (2017) Recursive cubes of rings as models for interconnection networks. Discrete Appl Math 217:639–662

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jahanshahi M, Bistouni F (2018) Interconnection networks. Crossbar-based interconnection networks. Springer, Cham, pp 9–39

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. McDonald N, Adriana F, Davis A, Isaev M, Kim J, Gibson D (2018) SuperSim: extensible flit-level simulation of large-scale interconnection networks. In: 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Performance Analysis of Systems and Software (ISPASS). IEEE, pp 87–98

  4. Mokhtar H (2017) Cube-connected circulants as efficient models for interconnection networks. J Interconnect Netw 17.03n04:1741007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman MMH, Mohammed NMA, Adamu AI, Dhiren KB, Yasuyuki M, Yasushi I (2019) A New static cost-effective parameter for interconnection networks of massively parallel computer systems. In: Soft computing data analytics. Springer, Singapore, pp 147–155

  6. Habibian H, Patooghy A (2017) Fault-tolerant routing methodology for hypercube and cube-connected cycles interconnection networks. J Supercomput 73(10):4560–4579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nai-Wen C, Sun-Yuan H (2018) Conditional diagnosability of (n, k)-star graphs under the PMC model. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 15(2):207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Decayeux C, Seme D (2005) 3D hexagonal network: modeling, topological properties, addressing scheme, and optimal routing algorithm. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 16(9):875–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. EI-Amawy A, Latifi S (1991) Properties and performances of folded hypercubes. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 2(1):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Efe K (1991) A variation on the hypercube with lower diameter. IEEE Trans Comput 40(11):1312–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohan KJ, Pataik LM (1992) Extended hypercube: a hierarchical interconnection network of hypercubes. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 3(1):45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghose K, Desai KR (1995) Hierarchical cubic network. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 6(4):427–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shi W, Srimani PK (2005) Hierarchical star: a new two level interconnection network. J Syst Archit 51:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yun SK, Park KH (1996) Hierarchical hypercube networks (HHN) for massively parallel computers. J Parallel Distrib Comput 37:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Duh D, Chen G, Fang J (1995) Algorithms and properties of a new two-level network with folded hypercubes as basic modules. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 6(7):714–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Malluhi QM, Bayoumi MA (1994) The hierarchical hypercube: a new interconnection topology for massively parallel system. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 5(1):17–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Seo JH (2013) Three-dimensional Petersen-torus network: a fixed-degree network for massively parallel computers. J Supercomput 64(3):987–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parhami B, Yeh CH (2000) Why network diameter is still important. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Communications in Computing, pp 271–274

  19. Saad Y, Schultz MH (1988) Topological properties of hypercubes. IEEE Trans Comput 37(7):867–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seo Jung-Hyun et al (2018) The hierarchical Petersen network: a new interconnection network with fixed degree. J Supercomput 74(4):1636–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seo JH, Lee H (2013) Link-disjoint broadcasting algorithm in wormhole-routed 3D Petersen–Torus networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw 9(12):501974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo JH, Lee H (2016) Embedding algorithm among half pancake, pancake, and star graphs. Int J Softw Eng Appl 10(3):191–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2017R1D1A3B03032173).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to HyeongOk Lee.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, Jh., Lee, H. Design and analysis of the rotational binary graph as an alternative to hypercube and Torus. J Supercomput 76, 7161–7176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03115-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03115-x

Keywords

Navigation