From the Academy
Evidence Analysis Center
Nutrition Assessment, Interventions, and Monitoring for Patients with Celiac Disease: An Evidence Analysis Center Scoping Review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2019.09.019Get rights and content

Abstract

The objectives of this scoping review were to identify and characterize studies examining nutrition assessment, interventions, and measures to monitor gluten-free diet (GFD) adherence/compliance in patients with celiac disease (CD). An electronic literature search of four databases (Cochrane Database for systematic reviews, CINAHL, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE) was conducted to identify articles examining nutrition care in CD individuals. Except for narrative review, grey literature, and case study/report, all types of peer-reviewed articles published between January 2007 and August 2018 were eligible. There were a total of 10,823 records; 10,368 were excluded during the first round of screening due to irrelevancy and/or duplication. Of the 455 full-text articles that were assessed, 292 met the criteria and were included. Most of the studies were observational studies (n=212), followed by experimental trials (n=50), evidence-based practice guideline (EBPG)/report/statement (n=16), and systematic review (SR) (n=14). Nine original studies examined assessment, focusing mainly on different tools/ways to assess GFD adherence. The majority of the included original articles (n=235) were in the nutrition intervention category with GFD, oats, and prebiotics/probiotics as the top-three most studied interventions. There were eight SRs on GFD and five on oats. One SR and 21 original studies investigated the effectiveness of different measures to monitor GFD adherence/compliance. Although recent CD EBPGs were identified, different methods with varying levels of rigor, in terms of literature search and assessment of evidence strength, were used. Based on this scoping review, interventions focused on gluten-free diet and oats have been significantly covered by either SRs or EBPGs. Studies related to prebiotics/probiotics and education program/counseling focused interventions, as well as assessment, in CD patients have increased in recent years. Thus, it might be beneficial to conduct SRs/EBPGs focused on these topics to guide practitioners.

Section snippets

Protocol

This scoping review used and adapted the methodological framework from the works of Arskey and O’Malley,10 Levac and colleagues (updated version),8 and the Joanna Briggs Institute,11 and also followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.12

Findings

The literature search resulted in 10,810 articles with 13 additional studies identified through other sources. A total of 6,647 and 3,721 records were removed because of duplication and lack of relevancy, respectively (Figure 2). Of the 455 full-text articles that were assessed, 292 met the a priori inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review.

The majority of the studies were observational studies (ie, cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, or validation studies) (n=212),

Conclusions and Future Direction

This scoping review completed a comprehensive literature search to examine the availability of literature on the validity and reliability of nutrition assessment methods, nutrition interventions, and tools/measures to monitor adherence/compliance among individuals with CD.

Based on the scoping review, some topics (eg, gluten-free diet, oats) were already covered by either a recent guideline or systematic review. For instance, a 2017 systematic review on consumption of oat241 included 12 of the

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anne Lee, EdD, RDN, LD (content advisor), Mary Sharrett, MS, RD, LD, CNSC (content advisor), and Margaret Foster, MS, MPH, AHIP (librarian) for their contributions to this project. The authors would also like to thank the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Medical Nutrition Practice Group DPG, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation for their financial support.

Author Contributions

Both authors were involved in the data collection and manuscript writing.

F. W. Cheng is a nutrition researcher, Evidence Analysis Center, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic, Chicago, IL.

References (307)

  • C. Ciacci et al.

    Urinary stone disease in adults with celiac disease: Prevalence, incidence and urinary determinants

    J Urol

    (2008)
  • J. Cosnes et al.

    Incidence of autoimmune diseases in celiac disease: Protective effect of the gluten-free diet

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2008)
  • J.F. Ludvigsson et al.

    The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms

    Gut

    (2013)
  • J.C. Bai et al.

    World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines: Celiac Disease February 2017

    J Clin Gastroenterol

    (2017)
  • S. Husby et al.

    European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2012)
  • ICMR Guideline on Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease

    (2016)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines: Coeliac Disease: Recognition, Assessment and Management

    (2015)
  • M.M. Leonard et al.

    Celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity: A review

    JAMA

    (2017)
  • Evidence Analysis Library. Celiac disease guideline

  • D. Levac et al.

    Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology

    Implement Sci

    (2010)
  • A. Booth et al.

    The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: An international prospective register of systematic reviews

    Syst Rev

    (2012)
  • H. Arskey et al.

    Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework

    Int J Soc Res Methodol

    (2005)
  • M. Peters et al.

    Chapter 11: Scoping reviews

  • A.C. Tricco et al.

    PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation

    Ann Intern Med

    (2018)
  • The Nutrition Care Process

  • M. Ouzzani et al.

    Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews

    Syst Rev

    (2016)
  • I.D. Hill et al.

    Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2005)
  • A. Rubio-Tapia et al.

    ACG clinical guidelines: Diagnosis and management of celiac disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2013)
  • S. Murch et al.

    Joint BSPGHAN and Coeliac UK guidelines for the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease in children

    Arch Dis Child

    (2013)
  • J.F. Ludvigsson et al.

    Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: Guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology

    Gut

    (2014)
  • NIH Consensus Development Conference on Celiac Disease

    NIH Consens State Sci Statements

    (2004)
  • A. Fasano et al.

    Federation of International Societies of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition consensus report on celiac disease

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2008)
  • J.F. Ludvigsson et al.

    Transition from childhood to adulthood in coeliac disease: The Prague consensus report

    Gut

    (2016)
  • K. Bibbins-Domingo et al.

    Screening for Celiac Disease: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

    JAMA

    (2017)
  • Coeliac Disease

    (2007)
  • I.D. Hill et al.

    NASPGHAN clinical report on the diagnosis and treatment of gluten-related disorders

    J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr

    (2016)
  • F. Biagi et al.

    A gluten-free diet score to evaluate dietary compliance in patients with coeliac disease

    Br J Nutr

    (2009)
  • F. Biagi et al.

    A score that verifies adherence to a gluten-free diet: A cross-sectional, multicentre validation in real clinical life

    Br J Nutr

    (2012)
  • P. Crespo Escobar et al.

    Development and validation of two food frequency questionnaires to assess gluten intake in children up to 36 months of age

    Nutr Hosp

    (2015)
  • R. Fueyo-Diaz et al.

    Magallon-Botaya R. Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Celiac Dietary Adherence Test. A simple questionnaire to measure adherence to a gluten-free diet

    Rev Esp Enferm Digest

    (2016)
  • R. Fueyo-Díaz et al.

    Development and validation of a specific self-efficacy scale in adherence to a gluten-free diet

    Front Psychol

    (2018)
  • S. Meyer et al.

    Development and validation of the Celiac Disease-Children's Activities Report (CD-Chart) for promoting self-management among children and adolescents

    Nutrients

    (2017)
  • D.A. Leffler et al.

    A simple validated gluten-free diet adherence survey for adults with celiac disease

    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

    (2009)
  • K. Haas et al.

    Text Message Intervention (TEACH) improves quality of life and patient activation in celiac disease: A randomized clinical trial

    J Pediatr

    (2017)
  • L.R. Jacobsson et al.

    Impact of an active patient education program on gastrointestinal symptoms in women with celiac disease following a gluten-free diet: A randomized controlled trial

    Gastroenterol Nurs

    (2012)
  • L. Ring Jacobsson et al.

    Does a coeliac school increase psychological well-being in women suffering from coeliac disease, living on a gluten-free diet?

    J Clin Nurs

    (2012)
  • K. Sainsbury et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of an online intervention to improve gluten-free diet adherence in celiac disease

    Am J Gastroenterol

    (2013)
  • S. Vriezinga et al.

    E-healthcare for celiac disease-a multicenter randomized controlled trial

    J Pediatr

    (2018)
  • F. Barzegar et al.

    The effect of education on the knowledge of patients with celiac disease

    Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench

    (2017)
  • S. Mahadev et al.

    Is dietitian use associated with celiac disease outcomes?

    Nutrients

    (2013)
  • Cited by (2)

    F. W. Cheng is a nutrition researcher, Evidence Analysis Center, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic, Chicago, IL.

    D. Handu is senior scientific director, Evidence Analysis Center, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetic, Chicago, IL.

    STATEMENT OF POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

    FUNDING/SUPPORT Funding provided by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Medical Nutrition Practice Group DPG, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation.

    View full text