Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal water and land resource allocation in pastoral areas based on a water–land forage–livestock balance: a case study of Otog Front Banner, Inner Mongolia, China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural grasslands provide important land resources in pastoral areas, and greatly contribute to ecological functioning. Overgrazing and other unreasonable exploitations have led to the degradation and desertification of natural grasslands, exacerbating the forage–livestock imbalance. In areas suffering from water shortage, this imbalance gradually evolves into a water–land forage–livestock imbalance. In this study, a water–land forage–livestock balance–based model was developed to optimise the allocation of water, land, and forage resources in pastoral areas, while addressing economic and ecological benefits in a coupled manner. The model was applied in a case study of Otog Front Banner to simulate the comprehensive economic and ecological benefits to the development of water, land, and forage resources in different coupled allocations of artificial and natural grasslands. The results showed that as the duration of supplementary and barn feeding increased, local development was first constrained by the availability of natural grasslands and then by the availability of water resources. The optimal resource allocation in Otog Front Banner predicted for 2030 included a water consumption of 266,000,000 m3, an irrigation area of 43,000 ha, a natural grassland utilisation area of 684,700 ha, and a livestock farming scale of 1,188,500 sheep units.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla M, Hastings A, Chadwick D, Jones D, D Evans C, Jones M, Rees B, Smith P (2018): Critical review of the impacts of grazing intensity on soil organic carbon storage and other soil quality indicators in extensively managed grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 253, 62–81

  • Bossio D, Geheb K, Critchley W (2010) Managing water by managing land: addressing land degradation to improve water productivity and rural livelihoods. Agric Water Manag 97:536–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1998) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol Econ 25:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily G, Postel S, Bawa K, Kaufman L (1997): Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems

  • Das B, Singh A, Panda S, Yasuda H (2015) Optimal land and water resources allocation policies for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Land Use Policy 42:527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davijani M, Banihabib ME, Nadjafzadeh Anvar A, Hashemi SR (2016) Multi-objective optimization model for the allocation of water resources in arid regions based on the maximization of socioeconomic efficiency. Water Resour Manag 30:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du HQ, Zuo XA, Li S, Wang T, Xue X (2019) Wind erosion changes induced by different grazing intensities in the desert steppe, Northern China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 274:1–13

  • Fan JW, Zhong HP, Harris W, Yu GR, Wang SQ, Hu ZM, Yue YZ (2008) Carbon storage in the grasslands of China based on field measurements of above- and below-ground biomass. Clim Chang 86:375–396

  • Fang JY, Bai YF, Li LH, Jiang GM, Huang JH, Huang ZY, Zhang WH, Gao SQ (2016) Scientific basis and practical ways for sustainable development of China’s pasture regions. Chin Sci Bull 61:155–164 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Fang Y, Ouyang ZY, Xiao Y, Zheng H, Xu WH, Bai Y, Jiang B (2011) Evaluation of the grassland ecosystem services of the Haihe River Basin. Chin J Nat Res 26:1694–1706 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Ford H, Garbutt A, Jones DL, Jones L (2012) Impacts of grazing abandonment on ecosystem service provision: coastal grassland as a model system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 162:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot R, Brander L, Van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, Hussain S, Kumar P, McVittie A, Portela R, Rodriguez L, Ten Brink P, Van Beukering PJH (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv 1:50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iftekhar S, Fogarty J (2017) Impact of water allocation strategies to manage groundwater resources in Western Australia: equity and efficiency considerations. J Hydrol 548

  • Khare D, Jat MK, Sunder JD (2007) Assessment of water resources allocation options: conjunctive use planning in a link canal command. Resour Conserv Recycl 51:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li HP, Shi HB, Guo YY, Shen PJ (2005) Study on sustainable utilization of water-grass resources and ecological threshold of pastoral area. J Hydraul Eng 36:694–700 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Guo P, Singh V, Yang GQ (2016) An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation. Agric Water Manag 177:10–23

  • Liu M, Dries L, Heijman W, Huang JK, Zhu XQ, Hu YN, Chen HB (2017): The impact of ecological construction programs on grassland conservation in Inner Mongolia, China: grassland conservation in Inner Mongolia. Land Degradation & Development 29

  • Lu HY, Li HP, Gao ZY, Wang DX, Wang J (2016) Water and land resources allocation model of pastoral area based on grassland ecological conservation. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 32:123–130 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Lu HY, Li HP, Wang J, Gao ZY(2018) Regulation model and application for water-land-forage-livestock balance in pastoral areas. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 34:87–95 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Malek Ž, Verburg PH (2018) Adaptation of land management in the Mediterranean under scenarios of irrigation water use and availability. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 23:821–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsinejad M, Yazdi AB, Araghinejad S, Nejadhashemi AP, Tabrizi MS (2013) Optimal water allocation in irrigation networks based on real time climatic data. Agric Water Manag 117:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulido M, Schnabel S, Lavado Contador JF, Lozano-Parra J, González F (2018) The impact of heavy grazing on soil quality and pasture production in rangelands of SW Spain. Land Degrad Dev 29:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegmund-Schultze M, Köppel J, Sobral MC (2018) Unraveling the water and land nexus through inter- and transdisciplinary research: sustainable land management in a semi-arid watershed in Brazil’s Northeast. Reg Environ Chang 18:2005–2017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttie J, Reynolds S, Batello C (2005): Grasslands of the world

  • Tamene L, Le QB, Vlek PLG (2014) A landscape planning and management tool for land and water resources management: an example application in Northern Ethiopia. Water Resour Manag 28:407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Q, Zhang S, Li R (2017) Optimal use of agricultural water and land resources through reconfiguring crop planting structure under socioeconomic and ecological objectives. Water 9

  • Unkovich M, Nan Z (2008) Problems and prospects of grassland agroecosystems in western China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vooren L, Reubens B, Broekx S, Reheul D, Verheyen K (2018) Assessing the impact of grassland management extensification in temperate areas on multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 267:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, You JJ (2016) Progress of water resources allocation during the past 30 years in China. J Hydraul Eng 47:265–271 and 282 (in Chinese with English abstract)

  • Xie GD, Zhang YL, Lu CX (2001) Study on valuation of rangeland ecosystem services of China. J Nat Resour 16:47–53 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Yu R, Chen X, Yu G, Gan M, Disse M (2017) Agricultural water allocation strategies along the oasis of Tarim River in Northwest China. Agric Water Manag 187:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZY, Si H, Feng BP, Hu C, Lu MX (2014) An optimal model for agriculture water and soil resources configuration in water shortage irrigation area. J Hydraul Eng 45:403–409 (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Special Fund of State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research (SKL2018ZY01), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41901052, 51609153), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC0609203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing, 10038, China

    Haiyuan Lu, Heping Li, Jun Wang, Hexiang Zheng, Xuesong Cao & Changfu Tong

  2. Institute of Water Resources for Pastoral Area, Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Hohhot, 010020, China

    Haiyuan Lu, Heping Li, Jun Wang, Hexiang Zheng, Xuesong Cao & Changfu Tong

Authors
  1. Haiyuan Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hexiang Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xuesong Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Changfu Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualisation: H. Lu. and H. Li; methodology: H. Lu; software: H. Lu; validation: H. Lu., H. Li, and C.T.; formal analysis: H. Lu.; investigation: J.W. and H.Z; data curation: H. Lu. and X. C; writing—original draft preparation: H. Lu. and H. Li; writing—review and editing: J.W. and H.Z; supervision: H. Li

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heping Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, H., Li, H., Wang, J. et al. Optimal water and land resource allocation in pastoral areas based on a water–land forage–livestock balance: a case study of Otog Front Banner, Inner Mongolia, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 10328–10341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07559-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07559-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation