Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Enhancement of biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste using alkali pretreatment

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is one of the most prospective and economical techniques to recover energy and simultaneously treat organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). However, more often than not, the complex polymeric structure of lignocellulosic fraction and high lipid content of Indian OFMSW prove to be hindrances in realizing the full potential of energy recovery through anaerobic digestion. Pretreatment of OFMSW is an effective method to enhance the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. This paper explores the effect of alkali pretreatment on change in characteristics of OFMSW in India and its subsequent impact on biogas generation. Pretreatment was carried out using 5 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution and varying the initial pH of OFMSW in the range of 8–13 for 24 h. Thereafter, batch anaerobic digestion assays of untreated and pretreated OFMSW were carried out using cow excrement as inoculum. Results indicate that NaOH pretreatment was advantageous in solubilizing the organic matter of OFMSW, thus increasing biogas yield and reduced digestion time. The cumulative biogas generation increased by 19.6–34.8% post-NaOH pretreatment. OFMSW pretreated with NaOH at pH 10 had maximum biogas yield of 407.1 mL/gVS with 68.9% methane content, as compared to 301.9 mL/gVS and 50.3% of untreated OFMSW. A preliminary cost assessment indicated a positive net profit for pretreatment of OFMSW with NaOH at pH ranges of 8–10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MoUD (2016) Manual on municipal solid waste management. Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organisation (CPHEEO). Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD) Government of India New Delhi. http://cpheeo.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/Part2.pdf

  2. Joshi R, Ahmed S (2016) Status and challenges of municipal solid waste management in India: A review. Cogent Environ Sci 2:1139434

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalyani KA, Pandey KK (2014) Waste to energy status in India: a short review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:113–120

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramachandra TV, Bharath HA, Kulkarni G, Han SS (2018) Municipal solid waste: generation, composition and GHG emissions in Bangalore India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1122–1136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mata-Alvarez J (2003) Biomethanization of the organic fraction of municipal solid wastes. IWA Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng Y, Zhao J, Xu F, Li Y (2014) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 42:35–53

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhange VP, William SP, Sharma A, Gabhane J, Vaidya AN, Wate SR (2015) Pretreatment of garden biomass using Fenton’s reagent: influence of Fe2+ and H2O2 concentrations on lignocellulose degradation. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 13:12

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brodeur G, Yau E, Badal K, Collier J, Ramachandran KB, Ramakrishnan S (2011) Chemical and physicochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Enzyme Res. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/787532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Singh A, Kuila A, Adak S et al (2012) Utilization of vegetable wastes for bioenergy generation. Agric Res 1(3):213–222

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neves L, Gonçalo E, Oliveira R, Alves MM (2008) Influence of composition on the biomethanation potential of restaurant waste at mesophilic temperatures. Waste Manag 28:965–972

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menon A, Ren F, Wang JY, Giannis A (2016) Effect of pretreatment techniques on food waste solubilization and biogas production during thermophilic batch anaerobic digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18(2):222–230

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagler M, Aichinger P, Kuprian M, Pümpel T, Insam H, Ebner C (2018) A case study for a cost-benefit-based, stepwise optimization of thermo-chemical WAS pretreatment for anaerobic digestion. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(1):266–273

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yoruklu HC, Korkmaz E, Demir NM, Ozkaya B, Demir A (2018) The impact of pretreatment and inoculum to substrate ratio on methane potential of organic wastes from various origins. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(2):800–809

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pecorini I, Baldi F, Carnevale EA, Corti A (2016) Biochemical methane potential tests of different autoclaved and microwaved lignocellulosic organic fractions of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag 56:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  15. Talebnia F, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I (2010) Production of bioethanol from wheat straw: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation. Bioresour Technol 101:4744–4753

    Google Scholar 

  16. Divyalakshmi P, Murugan D, Sivarajan M, Sivasamy A, Saravanan P, Rai CL (2018) Effect of ultrasonic pretreatment on secondary sludge and anaerobic biomass to enhance biogas production. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 20(1):481–488

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kojima Y, Yoon SL (2008) Improved enzymatic hydrolysis of waste paper by ozone pretreatment. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 10(2):134

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heo NH, Park SC, Lee JS, Kang H (2003) Solubilization of waste activated sludge by alkaline pretreatment and biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests for anaerobic co-digestion of municipal organic waste. Water Sci Technol 48(8):211–219

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodgers M, Hu Z, Zhan X (2009) Enhancing enzymatic hydrolysis of maize stover by Bayer process sand pretreatment. Energy Fuels 23(4):2284–2289

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xie S, Frost JP, Lawlor PG et al (2011) Effects of thermo-chemical pre-treatment of grass silage on methane production by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 102(19):8748–8755

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li H, Li Y, Zou S, Li C (2014) Extracting humic acids from digested sludge by alkaline treatment and ultrafiltration. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16(1):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 100(1):10–18

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673–686

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pavlostathis SG, Gossett JM (1985) Alkaline treatment of wheat straw for increasing anaerobic biodegradability. Biotechnol Bioeng 27(3):334–344

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9(9):1621–1651

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang D, Zheng Y, Zhang R (2009) Alkali pretreatment of rice straw for increasing the biodegradability. In: An ASABE International Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA.

  28. Torres ML, Lloréns MDCE (2008) Effect of alkaline pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of solid wastes. Waste Manag 28(11):2229–2234

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lin JG, Chang CN, Chang SC (1997) Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by alkaline solubilization. Bioresour Technol 62(3):85–90

    Google Scholar 

  30. Junoh H, Palanisamy K, Yip CH, Pua FL (2015) Optimization of NaOH thermo-chemical pretreatment to enhance solubilisation of organic food waste by response surface methodology. Intl J Chem Mol Nucl Mater Metall Eng 9(12):1282–1288

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lin Y, Wang D, Wu S, Wang C (2009) Alkali pretreatment enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper sludge. Bioresour Technol 170(1):366–373

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu J, Wan C, Li Y (2010) Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 101(19):7523–7528

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang D, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Zhu X (2010) New sludge pretreatment method to improve methane production in waste activated sludge digestion. Environ Sci Technol 44(12):4802–4808

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun R, Lawther JM, Banks WB (1995) Influence of alkaline pre-treatments on the cell wall components of wheat straw. Ind Crops Prod 4(2):127–145

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kim J, Park C, Kim TH, Lee M, Kim S, Kim SW, Lee J (2003) Effects of various pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J Biosci Bioeng 95(3):271–275

    Google Scholar 

  36. Dasgupta A, Chandel MK (2019) Enhancement of biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste using hydrothermal pretreatment. Bioresour Technol Rep 7:100281

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ramachandra TV, Bharath HA, Kulkarni G, Han SS (2018) Municipal solid waste: generation, composition and GHG emissions in Bangalore, India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:1122–1136

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bag S, Dubey R, Mondal N (2015) Solid waste to energy status in India: a short review. Discovery 39(177):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  39. Singh RP, Tyagi VV, Allen T, Ibrahim MH, Kothari R (2011) An overview for exploring the possibilities of energy generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian scenario. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(9):4797–4808

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wonglertarak W, Wichitsathian B (2014) Alkaline pretreatment of waste activated sludge in anaerobic digestion. J Clean Energy Technol 2(2):118–121

    Google Scholar 

  41. Uma Rani R, Adish Kumar S, Kaliappan S et al (2012) Low temperature thermo-chemical pretreatment of dairy waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion process. Bioresour Technol 103(1):415–424

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ray BT, Lin JG, Rajan RV (1990) Low-level alkaline solubilization for enhanced anaerobic digestion. Res J Water Pollution Cont Federation 62:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  43. APHA/AWWA/WEF (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Stand Methods. ISBN 9780875532356.

  44. Siedlecka EM, Kumirska J, Ossowski T et al (2008) Determination of volatile fatty acids in environmental aqueous samples. Polish J Environ Stud 17:351–356

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ayeni AO, Adeeyo OA, Oresegun OM, Oladimeji TE (2015) Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of an economically viable method suitable for woody and non-woody biomass. Am J Eng Res 4:14–19

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wang C, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Pang M (2016) Alternative policies to subsidize rural household biogas digesters. Energy Policy 93:187–195

    Google Scholar 

  47. BIS (1992) Bureau of Indian Standards https://bis.gov.in/qazwsx/cmd/draft4246.pdf. Accessed 3 Oct 2018.

  48. IOCL (2018) Indian Oil Corporation Limited. https://www.iocl.com/Products/Indanegas.aspx. Accessed 3 Oct 2018.

  49. Jin Y, Li H, Mahar RB, Wang Z, Nie Y (2009) Combined alkaline and ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge before aerobic digestion. J Environ Sci 21(3):279–284

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu H, Fang HH (2002) Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. J Biotechnol 95(3):249–256

    Google Scholar 

  51. Song Z, Yang G, Liu X et al (2014) Comparison of seven chemical pretreatments of corn straw for improving methane yield by anaerobic digestion. PLoS ONE 9:e93801

    Google Scholar 

  52. Li H, Li C, Liu W, Zou S (2012) Optimized alkaline pretreatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 123:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng M, Li X, Li L et al (2009) Enhancing anaerobic biogasification of corn stover through wet state NaOH pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 100(21):5140–5145

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bala R, Gupta GK, Dasgupta BV, Mondal MK (2019) Pretreatment optimisation and kinetics of batch anaerobic digestion of liquidised OFMSW treated with NaOH: models verification with experimental data. J Environ Manag 237:313–321

    Google Scholar 

  55. Shehu MS, Manan ZA, Alwi SRW (2012) Optimization of thermo-alkaline disintegration of sewage sludge for enhanced biogas yield. Bioresour Technol 114:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99(10):4044–4064

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T (2012) Methane production from lignocellulosic agricultural crop wastes: a review in context to second generation of biofuel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16(3):1462–1476

    Google Scholar 

  58. Passos F, Uggetti E, Carrère H, Ferrer I (2014) Pretreatment of microalgae to improve biogas production: a review. Bioresour Technol 172:403–412

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, Jones DL (2008) Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol 99(17):7928–7940

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munish Kumar Chandel.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dasgupta, A., Chandel, M.K. Enhancement of biogas production from organic fraction of municipal solid waste using alkali pretreatment. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 22, 757–767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-00970-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-00970-2

Keywords

Navigation