Subchronic feeding toxicity studies of drought-tolerant transgenic wheat MGX11-10 in Wistar Han RCC rats
Introduction
Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important food crops, cultivated on about 220 million ha, providing food to one-third of the global population and providing 20% of the global caloric requirements (Gill BS et al., 2004; Shiferaw B et al., 2013; Rasheed A et al., 2018). The yield of wheat is significantly affected by climatic change and scarcity of water resources in the environment. Drought is one of the environmental stresses that seriously limit crop production in the majority of agriculture fields in the world (Al-Maskri et al., 2016; Lesk, C. et al., 2016; Kulkarni M et al., 2017; Matiu et al., 2017). As a result of climate change, the global frequency and severity of drought events is likely to increase (Shahinnia F et al., 2016). It is estimated that a cereal (maize, rice and wheat) loss of 1820 million Mg has been caused by droughts during the past four decades globally (Leng G, 2019). Drought stress caused a reversible decline in leaf water relations, membrane stability, and photosynthetic activity, leading to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, lipid peroxidation and membrane injury (Abid M et al., 2018). This phenomenon inhibits further nutrient absorption and affects crop growth, gene expression, distribution, yield and quality (Stendle and Peterson, 1998; Guo R et al., 2018). A way to improve the drought tolerance of crops is to discover new genes and alleles that allow plants to continue to grow and maintain or increase grain yield under water-limited growing conditions.
With the continuous development of transgenic technology, the generalization and application of transgenic crops is progressing rapidly. The methods of modern agricultural biotechnology have been utilized to transfer genes from one organism to another without sexual reproduction and across species. This process allows targeted alterations to be introduced into plant genomes in a more specific and controlled manner and more rapidly than can be achieved through conventional breeding and selection of crops. Wheat event MGX11-10 was genetically modified to improve drought tolerance. The WK gene was cloned from wheat, and the wheat Jimai 22 was used as the transformation receptor. WK gene is a protein kinase gene, WK protein kinase catalyzes phosphorylation of protein, and protein phosphorylation is involved in the transmission of stress signals and plays an important role in improving plant drought tolerance (Zhao, 2015). Genetically modified plants expressing drought-tolerance traits offer a new strategy for crop protection, but at the same time, present a challenge in terms of food safety assessment. Because the methods used to produce crops with biotechnology differ from those used in conventional breeding, numerous scientific organizations have published guidelines for assessing their safety (WHO, 1991 and 1995; FAO, 1996; and OECD, 1993 and 1997). The primary goal established in these guidelines is comparison analysis between the particular genetically modified (GM) crop and the corresponding non-transgenic control crop with an established history of safe use. In most cases, the data necessary to demonstrate that a GM crop is “as safe as” the corresponding non-transgenic control comparator can be determined based on compositional analysis, however, a number of 13 week (i.e., subchronic) rodent toxicology studies have also been conducted with food and feed fractions from GM crops that support their safety (Bai H et al., 2015; Sabitha et al. 2017; Zou S et al., 2018; Sabitha et al. 2018; Qian et al., 2018a; Qian et al., 2018b).
In the present study, we report the results of a 13 week rodent toxicology study conducted with MGX11-10 wheat. This study was conducted in compliance with Chinese guideline on the performance of safety assessment of genetically modified plant and derived products 90-day feeding test in rats(NY/T 1102–2006)at the Experimental Animal Center of the Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Tianjin, China).
Section snippets
Plant materials
The GM wheat, MGX11-10, and the corresponding non-transgenic control wheat, JIMAI 22, were supplied by the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. The wheat was from plants grown concurrently in the same location. After harvest and a storage period of three months, the mature seeds were milled and processed into flour for diet preparation.
Animals
The feeding studies were conducted at the Specific Pathogen Free animal laboratory of the Testing Center of Genetically Modified Organisms at Tianjin
Clinical observation
No signs of morbidity and mortality were observed during the whole 90 days. All rats survived the duration of the feeding trial. During the study, the animals in each group were active, ate normally. Clinical observation of the treated rats throughout the study indicated that none of them showed signs of toxicity in their skin, fur, eyes, mucus membrane, or behavioral changes, diarrhoea, tremors, salivation, sleep, and coma.
Body weight and feed consumption
There were no statistically identified or treatment-related differences
Discussion
Farmer has used traditional breeding techniques for many years to select desired crop traits. Since the development of advanced genetic technologies over the past 20 years, breeders and scientists were allowed to bring specific desired genetic changes into the plants in a more precise and controlled manner. It is possible to transfer a gene from one organism to another without sexual reproduction. Plants have been engineered using a variety of techniques including expression of transferred
Conclusions
The results of this study did not show any adverse effects in rats following 90 days of dietary exposure to genetically modified wheat MGX11-10. Therefore results support the overall weight of evidence that demonstrates that MGX11-10 wheat is as safe as wheat from the corresponding non-transgenic control group wheat Jimai22.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Yinghua Liu: Methodology, Project administration, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Shujing Zhang: Investigation, Data curation, Software. Qinghong Zhou: Investigation, Resources. Shufei Li: Investigation, Resources. Jing Zhang: Investigation. Li Zhang: Investigation. Shuqing Jiang: Supervision, Investigation. Qian Zhang: Software. Xiaoli Zhou: Investigation. Chao Wu: Visualization. Qing Gu: Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Zhi Yong Qian:
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financialinterestsor personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Major science and technology project to create new crop varieties using gene transfer technology (2016zx08011005-009). The authors state that they have no conflict of interest.
References (34)
Safety assessment of GM plants: an updated review of the scientific literature
Food Chem. Toxicol.
(2016)- et al.
Constitutive expression of GmF6′H1 from soybean improves salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis
Plant Physiol. Biochem.
(2019) - et al.
Evaluation of the safety of a genetically modified DAS-444Ø6-6 soybean meal and hulls in a 90-day dietary toxicity study in rats
Food Chem. Toxicol.
(2017) - et al.
Evaluation of 30% DAS-444Ø6-6 soybean meal in a subchronic rat toxicity study
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2018) - et al.
Safety evaluation of DAS-44406-6 soybeans in Wistar rats
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2018) - et al.
Subchronic toxicity study in rats evaluating genetically modified DAS-81419-2 soybean
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2018) - et al.
Impact on environment, ecosystem, diversity and health from culturing and using GMOs as feed and food
Food Chem. Toxicol.
(2017) The use of transgenic plants to study plant gene expression
Trends Genet.
(1988)- et al.
Safety evaluation of genetically modified DAS-40278-9 maize in a subchronic rodent feeding study
Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol.
(2018) - et al.
Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Sci. Rep.
(2018)