Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

The impact of atrial fibrillation on accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement: effect of ventricular rate

Hypertension Research volume 43, pages 518–524 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of ventricular rate (VR) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with oscillometric BP measurements. This study included 138 patients with AF and 112 patients with sinus rhythm (SR) who underwent coronary angiography. Left arm BP was measured three times with an oscillometric device, and the average was recorded as the final oscillometric value. At the same time, the average of three intra-aortic BP readings was used as invasive values. Delta BP was the difference between intra-aortic and oscillometric BP. Meanwhile, the BP percentage difference (PD-BP) was calculated with the following formula: PD-BP = (delta BP/intra-aortic BP) × 100%. Based on the VR, four subgroups of AF and SR patients, <80, 80–99, 100–120, and >120 bpm, were created, and the mean PD-BP for both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was significantly higher in the AF group than in the SR group. Moreover, the mean PD-SBP values gradually increased as VR increased in both groups. More importantly, the difference in PD-SBP between the AF and SR groups increased as VR increased: when VR was <80 bpm, the levels were similar (−2.0 ± 3.5 vs. −1.4 ± 2.7 mm Hg, NS), but these values in AF patients were significantly higher when VR was 80–99 bpm (−3.7 ± 5.0 vs. −1.8 ± 2.3 mm Hg, p < 0.05), 100–120 bpm (−6.1 ± 4.3 vs. −2.3 ± 1.9 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and >120 bpm (−7.8 ± 4.9 vs. −2.9 ± 1.7 mm Hg, p < 0.05). The accuracy of oscillometric BP measurements are dependent on the ventricular rate in AF patients even after three measurements, and a higher ventricular rate may result in larger underestimations of oscillometric BP.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Destounis A, Tzamouranis D. Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30:2074–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pagonas N, Schmidt S, Eysel J, Compton F, Hoffmann C, Seibert F, et al. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring. Hypertension. 2013;62:579–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kollias A, Stergiou GS. Automated measurement of office, home and ambulatory blood pressure in atrial fibrillation. Clin Exp Pharm Physiol. 2014;41:9–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maselli M, Giantin V, Corrado D, Franchin A, Attanasio F, Pengo V, et al. Reliability of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in atrial fibrillation patients admitted for electric cardioversion. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17:558–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alpert BS, Quinn D, Gallick D. Oscillometric blood pressure: a review for clinicians. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014;8:930–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Karpettas N. Does atrial fibrillation affect the automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement? Hypertension. 2013;62:e37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Myers MG, Stergiou GS. Should oscillometric blood pressure monitors be used in patients with atrial fibrillation? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015;17:565–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giantin V, Perissinotto E, Franchin A, Baccaglini K, Attanasio F, Maselli M, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in elderly patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: is it absolutely contraindicated or a useful tool in clinical practice and research? Hypertens Res. 2013;36:889–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang XX, Shuai W, Hong K, Li P, Cheng XS, Su H, et al. How to evaluate BP measurements using the oscillometric method in atrial fibrillation: the value of pulse rate variation. Hypertens Res. 2016;39:588–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi H, Yoshika M, Yokoi T. Validation of three automatic devices for the self-measurement of blood pressure according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010: the Omron HEM-7130, HEM-7320F, and HEM-7500F[J]. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20:92–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dart RA, Alpert B, Quinn D. Effect of mechanical behavior of the brachial artery on blood pressure measurement during cuff inflation and cuff deflation[J]. Blood Press Monit. 2014;19:120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo X, Xiong Q, Xu J, Hong K, Li J, Su H, et al. Differences in heart rate response and recovery after 6-minute walking test between patients with atrial fibrillation and in sinus rhythm. Am J Cardiol. 2018;122:592–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Badheka AO, Patel NJ, Grover PM, Shah N, Patel N, Mitrani RD, et al. Optimal blood pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation (from the AFFIRM Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2014;114:727–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dąbrowski M, Lewandowski J, Abramczyk P, Łoń I, Gaciong Z, Siński M. Atrial fibrillation does not affect ankle-brachial index measured using the Doppler method. Hypertens Res. 2018;41:60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: Blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the subcommittee of professional and public education of the American Heart Association council on high blood pressure research. Hypertension. 2005;45:142–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Picone DS, Schultz MG, Otahal P, Aakhus S, Al-Jumaily AM, Black JA, et al. Accuracy of CUff-measured Blood Pressure: Systematic Reviews And Meta-analyses. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:572–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Vardas P, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;2893–962.

  19. Raamat R, Talts J, Jagomägi K, Kivastik J. Accuracy of some algorithms to determine the oscillometric mean arterial pressure: a theoretical study. Blood Press Monit. 2013;18:50–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate all the participants and their relatives in the study and the members of the survey teams in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Feng Xie, Jingsong Xu, Ling-lin Xia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

    Feng Xie, Jingsong Xu, Xiao Luo, Zhenzhen Jiang, Yanqing Wu & Hai Su

  2. College of Software of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

    Ling-lin Xia

Authors
  1. Feng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingsong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ling-lin Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhenzhen Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanqing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hai Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai Su.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, F., Xu, J., Xia, Ll. et al. The impact of atrial fibrillation on accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement: effect of ventricular rate. Hypertens Res 43, 518–524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-019-0386-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-019-0386-4

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links