Abstract
Background
Pancreatic cyst fluids (PCFs) enriched in tumor-derived DNA are a potential source of new biomarkers. The study aimed to analyze germinal variants and mutational profiles of cell-free (cf)DNA shed into the cavity of pancreatic cysts.
Methods
The study cohort consisted of 71 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of PCF. Five malignant cysts, 19 intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs), 11 mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs), eight serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs), and 28 pseudocysts were identified. The sequencing of 409 genes included in Comprehensive Cancer Panel was performed using Ion Proton System. The mutation rate of the KRAS and GNAS canonical loci was additionally determined using digital PCR.
Results
The number of mutations detected with NGS varied from 0 to 22 per gene, and genes with the most mutations were: TP53, KRAS, PIK3CA, GNAS, ADGRA2, and APC. The frequencies of the majority of mutations did not differ between non-malignant cystic neoplasms and pseudocysts. NGS detected KRAS mutations in malignant cysts (60%), IPMNs (32%), MCNs (64%), SCNs (13%), and pseudocysts (14%), with GNAS mutations in 20%, 26%, 27%, 13%, and 21% of samples, respectively. Digital PCR-based testing increased KRAS (68%) and GNAS (52%) mutations detection level in IPMNs, but not other cyst types.
Conclusions
We demonstrate relatively high rates of somatic mutations of cancer-related genes, including KRAS and GNAS, in cfDNA isolated from PCFs irrespectively of the pancreatic cyst type. Further studies on molecular mechanisms of pancreatic cysts malignant transformation in relation to their mutational profiles are required.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- NGS:
-
Next-generation sequencing
- EUS-FNA:
-
Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration
- PCF:
-
Pancreatic cyst fluid
- PCL:
-
Pancreatic cystic lesion
- IPMN:
-
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm
- MCN:
-
Mucinous cystic neoplasm
- SCN:
-
Serous cystic neoplasm
- dPCR:
-
Digital PCR
References
Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, et al. Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2488–2498.
Genovese G, Kähler AK, Handsaker RE, et al. Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2477–2487.
Martincorena I, Roshan A, Gerstung M, et al. Tumor evolution. High burden and pervasive positive selection of somatic mutations in normal human skin. Science. 2015;348:880–886.
Yokoyama A, Kakiuchi N, Yoshizato T, et al. Age-related remodelling of oesophageal epithelia by mutated cancer drivers. Nature. 2019;565:312–317.
Martincorena I, Fowler JC, Wabik A, et al. Somatic mutant clones colonize the human esophagus with age. Science. 2018;362:911–917.
Yizhak K, Aguet F, Kim J, et al. RNA sequence analysis reveals macroscopic somatic clonal expansion across normal tissues. Science. 2019;364:pii: eaaw0726.
Basturk O, Coban I, Adsay NV. Pancreatic cysts: pathologic classification, differential diagnosis, and clinical implications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133:423–438.
Hruban RH, Maitra A, Kern SE, Goggins M. Precursors to pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36:831–849.
Fernández-del Castillo C, Targarona J, Thayer SP, Rattner DW, Brugge WR, Warshaw AL. Incidental pancreatic cysts: clinicopathologic characteristics and comparison with symptomatic patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:427–434. (discussion 433-434).
Adsay NV, Klimstra DS, Compton CC. Cystic lesions of the pancreas. Introduction. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2000;17:1–6.
Correa-Gallego C, Ferrone CR, Thayer SP, Wargo JA, Warshaw AL, Fernández-Del Castillo C. Incidental pancreatic cysts: Do we really know what we are watching? Pancreatology. 2010;10:144–150.
Bosman FT, World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, eds. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010.
Yoon WJ, Brugge WR. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms: diagnosis and management. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2012;41:103–118.
Tanaka M, Chari S, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines for management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Pancreatology.. 2006;6:17–32.
Wu J, Matthaei H, Maitra A, et al. Recurrent GNAS mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:92ra66.
Furukawa T, Kuboki Y, Tanji E, et al. Whole-exome sequencing uncovers frequent GNAS mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Sci Rep.. 2011;1:161.
Wu J, Jiao Y, Dal Molin M, et al. Whole-exome sequencing of neoplastic cysts of the pancreas reveals recurrent mutations in components of ubiquitin-dependent pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:21188–21193.
Springer S, Wang Y, Dal Molin M, et al. A combination of molecular markers and clinical features improve the classification of pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1501–1510.
Paziewska A, Polkowski M, Rubel T, et al. Mass spectrometry-based comprehensive analysis of pancreatic cyst fluids. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7169595.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–1303.
Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucl Acids Res. 2010;38:e164.
Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucl Acids Res. 2003;31:3812–3814.
Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013;76:7.20.1–7.20.41.
Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:3940–3941.
Vege SS, Ziring B, Jain R, Moayyedi P, Clinical Guidelines Committee, American Gastroenterology Association. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:819–822.
Jones M, Zheng Z, Wang J, et al. Impact of next-generation sequencing on the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:140–148.
Zheng Z, Liebers M, Zhelyazkova B, et al. Anchored multiplex PCR for targeted next-generation sequencing. Nat Med. 2014;20:1479–1484.
Singhi AD, McGrath K, Brand RE, et al. Preoperative next-generation sequencing of pancreatic cyst fluid is highly accurate in cyst classification and detection of advanced neoplasia. Gut. 2018;67:2131–2141.
Singhi AD, Nikiforova MN, Fasanella KE, et al. Preoperative GNAS and KRAS testing in the diagnosis of pancreatic mucinous cysts. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:4381–4389.
Gleeson FC, Levy MJ. The evolving field of genomic biomarkers to characterize pancreatic cystic neoplasia by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:149–150.
Khalid A, McGrath KM, Zahid M, et al. The role of pancreatic cyst fluid molecular analysis in predicting cyst pathology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3:967–973.
Schoedel KE, Finkelstein SD, Ohori NP. K-Ras and microsatellite marker analysis of fine-needle aspirates from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34:605–608.
Amato E, Molin MD, Mafficini A, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing of cancer genes dissects the molecular profiles of intraductal papillary neoplasms of the pancreas. J Pathol. 2014;233:217–227.
Kadayifci A, Atar M, Wang JL, et al. Value of adding GNAS testing to pancreatic cyst fluid KRAS and carcinoembryonic antigen analysis for the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:111–117.
Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–197.
Kleftogiannis D, Punta M, Jayaram A, et al. Identification of single nucleotide variants using position-specific error estimation in deep sequencing data. BMC Med Genom. 2019;12:115.
Dias Carvalho P, Guimarães CF, Cardoso AP, et al. KRAS oncogenic signaling extends beyond cancer cells to orchestrate the microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2018;78:7–14.
Park JT, Johnson N, Liu S, et al. Differential in vivo tumorigenicity of diverse KRAS mutations in vertebrate pancreas: a comprehensive survey. Oncogene. 2015;34:2801–2806.
Anglesio MS, Papadopoulos N, Ayhan A, et al. Cancer-associated mutations in endometriosis without cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1835–1848.
Nikolaev SI, Vetiska S, Bonilla X, et al. Somatic activating KRAS mutations in arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:250–261.
Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature. 2009;458:719–724.
Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N, Velculescu VE, Zhou S, Diaz LA, Kinzler KW. Cancer genome landscapes. Science. 2013;339:1546–1558.
Molin MD, Matthaei H, Wu J, et al. Clinicopathological correlates of activating GNAS mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3802–3808.
Lee LS, Doyle LA, Houghton J, et al. Differential expression of GNAS and KRAS mutations in pancreatic cysts. JOP. 2014;15:581–586.
Al-Haddad M, DeWitt J, Sherman S, et al. Performance characteristics of molecular (DNA) analysis for the diagnosis of mucinous pancreatic cysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:79–87.
Cottrell CE, Al-Kateb H, Bredemeyer AJ, et al. Validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for clinical molecular oncology. J Mol Diagn. 2014;16:89–105.
Milbury CA, Zhong Q, Lin J, et al. Determining lower limits of detection of digital PCR assays for cancer-related gene mutations. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2014;1:8–22.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Centre [2012/05/B/NZ5/01539].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design of the study were done by JO, AP, MP, and MM. MP and AWK contributed to patients recruitment and clinical data compilation. AP, JK, and MD contributed to DNA isolation, Comprehensive Cancer Panel sequencing, and digital PCR; sequencing data analyses were done by KG; drafting of the manuscript was done by JO, MP, KG, and MM.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board at the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland. The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki and informed written consent was obtained from the participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10620_2019_6043_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx
Non-silent exonic variants detected in assessed samples. CHROM, POSITION—genome coordinates of variant; REF/ALT—reference/alternative variant sequence; foundVariants—number of samples with alternative variant detected, p value Fisher—p value for comparison of alternative variant occurrence between IPMN + MNC + SCN and PC group (Fisher exact test); gene_variants—number of samples with alternative, non-silent variant detected at any site across the whole gene; p value Gene—p value for comparison of alternative variant occurrence across the whole gene IPMN + MNC + SCN and PC group (Fisher exact test); esp6500siv2_all—variant frequency according to National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute GO Exome Sequencing Project; 1000g2015aug_eur—variant frequency in the 1000 Genomes Project database (European); SIFT/Polyphen2—prediction of variant impact on protein structure: B-benign, T-tolerated, D-deleterious; columns AA-CQ—fraction of reads supporting alternative variants for respective samples (XLSX 97 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paziewska, A., Polkowski, M., Goryca, K. et al. Mutational Mosaics of Cell-Free DNA from Pancreatic Cyst Fluids. Dig Dis Sci 65, 2294–2301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06043-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-06043-1