Elsevier

Biochimie

Volume 170, March 2020, Pages 94-105
Biochimie

Research paper
Deciphering the essentiality and function of SxSx motif in Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2020.01.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The UvrB SxSx motif is analogous to a TxGx motif in the helicases of superfamily 2.

  • The function(s) of UvrB SxSx motif is unknown for orthologs across all species.

  • To investigate the significance of SxSx motif, variants of UvrB were characterized.

  • The SxSx motif of UvrB is involved in its DNA binding, helicase and ATPase activities.

Abstract

The UvrB subunit is a central component of the UvrABC incision complex and plays a pivotal role in damage recognition, strand excision and repair synthesis. A conserved structural motif (the SxSx motif) present in UvrB is analogous to a similar motif (TxGx) in the helicases of superfamily 2, whose function is not fully understood. To elucidate the significance of the SxSx (Ser143-Val144-Ser145-Cys146) motif in Mycobacterium tuberculosis UvrB (MtUvrB), different variants of MtUvrB subunit were constructed and characterized. The SxSx motif indeed was found to be essential for MtUvrB function: while Ser143 and Cys146 residues within this motif were crucial for MtUvrB function, Ser145 plays an important but less essential role. The SxSx motif-deleted mutant was drastically attenuated and three single (S143A, S145A and C146A) mutants and a double (S143A/S145A) mutant exhibited various degrees of severity in their DNA-binding, DNA helicase and ATPase activities. Taken together, these results highlight a hitherto unrecognized role for SxSx motif in the catalytic activities of UvrB.

Introduction

In all living organisms, robust biochemical and network-level mechanisms exist to ensure the integrity of their genomes. The nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is a frontline defense mechanism in all cells for repair of bulky DNA lesions that destabilises the DNA structure [[1], [2], [3]]. In bacteria, NER is an important DNA repair pathway that removes different types of structurally unrelated DNA adducts such as cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers, alkylation adducts, chemotherapeutic adducts as well as cisplatin interstrand crosslinks [[3], [4], [5]]. The process of NER involves the concerted action of six proteins, namely UvrA, UvrB, UvrC, DNA helicase II (UvrD), Pol I and DNA ligase, which orchestrate the sequential steps in the process of damage recognition, unwinding of DNA around the lesion, dual excision flanking the damaged site and finally, repair resynthesis and DNA ligation [[4], [5], [6], [7]]. Based on numerous genetic, biochemical and X-ray crystallographic studies, three major stages associated with the early steps of the NER pathway have been defined in the Escherichia coli paradigm [[3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]]. Notwithstanding the early uncertainties, a growing body of evidence suggests that the UvrA2B2 hetero-tetrameric complex is responsible for damage recognition [[10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]]. The ATP hydrolysis by (UvrA)2 renders its dissociation from the lesion complex, thereby allowing UvrB2 to recruit UvrC to form a pre-incision complex [[3], [4], [5], [6],[16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]]. The next step involves dual incisions by UvrC at sites flanking the DNA lesion, four/five nucleotides 3′ from the lesion and eight nucleotides from the 5′ side [[3], [4], [5], [6],[22], [23], [24], [25]]. The post-incision complex comprising of 12 to 13-mer single-stranded DNA and UvrBC subunits is removed by UvrD and Pol I [[3], [4], [5], [6],[25], [26], [27], [28]]. Finally, the gap is filled by DNA polymerase and the broken strands are sealed by DNA ligase [[3], [4], [5], [6],28].

The UvrB protein, which belongs to the superfamily 2 (SF2) of helicases, plays a central role in the NER pathway. A hallmark of the SF2 superfamily of helicases is the presence of seven conserved helicase motifs (motifs I, Ia, II, III, IV, V and VI), and some possess auxiliary domains [29,30]. These motifs are spread over two RecA-like domains that together constitute the helicase core, which by themselves couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA/RNA unwinding [29,30]. The multiple sequence alignment of MtUvrB revealed the existence of seven helicase motifs and also an auxiliary motif, downstream of the β-hairpin (Fig. 1A). One of the auxiliary domains is the SxSx motif, analogous to the TxGx motif of the SF2 superfamily of helicases (Fig. 1B). Various studies have found that TxGx motif is highly divergent and serine is often substituted for threonine [29,30]. The TxGx motif in some members of the SF2 superfamily of helicases is located in motif I [31]. The X-ray crystal structure of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB bound to DNA found that two serine residues (Ser141 and Ser143) in the SxSx motif, among others (Lys67, Ser91, Gln346 and Arg357), make electrostatic interactions with the inner strand of the duplex DNA (Fig. 1C) [32]. Here, we emphasize that these predictions have not been experimentally verified and, consequently, the significance of Ser141 and Ser143 residues in UvrB catalytic activities is not known.

To gain insights into the structure-function relationship of the SxSx motif, a molecular model was constructed for MtUvrB using the B. caldotenax UvrB X-ray crystal structure as a template (PDB code: 1D9X) and superimposed with B. caldotenax UvrB-DNA crystal structure (PDB code: 2FDC) [32,33]. The structures are highly similar (root mean square deviation of 1.37 Å, over the entire protein) and the DNA binding region is conserved. In addition to Ser143 and Ser145 residues in the MtUvrB SxSx motif, which track along the DNA, we found Cys146 (not seen in the B. caldotenax UvrB-DNA crystal structure) within the DNA binding region (Fig. 1D). To elucidate the functional roles of these residues in the SxSx motif, MtUvrB variants were constructed and examined with regards to their functional properties. Our results demonstrate markedly different degrees of severity in DNA binding, DNA helicase and ATPase activities. Taken together, these findings highlight a hitherto unrecognized role for SxSx motif in the catalytic activities of UvrB.

Section snippets

Chemicals, enzymes, oligonucleotides, bacterial strains and antibodies

The chemicals and antibiotics were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Bangalore, India). Sephadex G-50 superfine beads and Hiload 16/600 Superdex 200 pg were purchased from Wipro GE Healthcare (Bangalore, India). [γ-32P]ATP was purchased from the Bhabha Atomic Research Center, Mumbai. T4 DNA ligase, T4 polynucleotide kinase, GeneJET gel extraction kit and unstained protein molecular weight markers were procured from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, Mass, USA). Restriction endonucleases and Q5

Construction and in vitro characterization of MtUvrB SxSx motif variants

Previous work has suggested that MtUvrB exhibits DNA-stimulated ATPase and a structure-specific ATP-dependent DNA helicase activities [36]. It belongs to the SF2 superfamily of helicases and harbours an auxiliary SxSx motif (Fig. 1). To determine if the SxSx motif is essential for the enzymatic functions of MtUvrB, mutations were introduced within this conserved motif by site-directed mutagenesis. Three single (S143A, S145A and C146A), one double (S143A/S145A) and one triple (S143A/S145A/C146A)

Discussion

The TxGx/SxSx motif shows a high degree of conservation among the members of the SF2 superfamily of helicases; therefore, this motif is thought to have a biological function [[29], [30], [31],44,45]. However, to our knowledge, the function of TxGx/SxSx motif has not been characterized in any species of bacteria. Thus, a notable finding in this study is that the SxSx motif is indeed essential for the function of MtUvrB. The MtUvrB lacking SxSx motif was severely attenuated in DNA binding,

Author contributions

M. T. and K. M. conceived and designed experiments; M.T. carried out experiments; M.T. and K. M. analyzed the data; K.M. wrote the manuscript with input from M.T. Both authors reviewed the data and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors state that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a Senior Research Fellowship to M.T. [09/079(2548)/2012-EMR-I] from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. K.M. is the recipient of J. C. Bose National Fellowship, CSIR Bhatnagar Fellowship and a grant (BT/CoE/34/SP15232/2015) under the Center of Excellence from the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi. We thank Neetu Sain for her assistance and advice with the homology modelling.

References (57)

  • B. Ahn

    A physical interaction of UvrD with nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB

    Mol. Cells

    (2000)
  • M.E. Fairman-Williams et al.

    SF1 and SF2 helicases: family matters

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2010)
  • E.Y. Oh et al.

    Characterization of the helicase activity of the Escherichia coli UvrAB protein complex

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1989)
  • K. Theis et al.

    The nucleotide excision repair protein UvrB, a helicase-like enzyme with a catch

    Mutat. Res.

    (2000)
  • H. Wang et al.

    UvrB domain 4, an autoinhibitory gate for regulation of DNA binding and ATPase activity

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • J.M. Caruthers et al.

    Helicase structure and mechanism

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (2002)
  • M. Sohi et al.

    Crystal structure of Escherichia coli UvrB C-terminal domain, and a model for UvrB-uvrC interaction

    FEBS Lett.

    (2000)
  • J. Eryilmaz et al.

    Structural insights into the cryptic DNA-dependent ATPase activity of UvrB

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2006)
  • M. Skorvaga et al.

    The beta -hairpin motif of UvrB is essential for DNA binding, damage processing, and UvrC-mediated incisions

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M. Skorvaga et al.

    Identification of residues within UvrB that are important for efficient DNA binding and damage processing

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2004)
  • G.F. Moolenaar et al.

    Binding of the UvrB dimer to non-damaged and damaged DNA: residues Y92 and Y93 influence the stability of both subunits

    DNA Repair

    (2005)
  • E. Malta et al.

    Base flipping in nucleotide excision repair

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • T.R. Waters et al.

    Damage detection by the UvrABC pathway: crystal structure of UvrB bound to fluorescein-adducted DNA

    FEBS Lett.

    (2006)
  • A. Sancar

    Mechanisms of DNA excision repair

    Science

    (1994)
  • B. Van Houten

    Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli

    Microbiol. Rev.

    (1990)
  • C. Kisker et al.

    Prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair

    Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.

    (2013)
  • J.J. Truglio et al.

    Prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair: the UvrABC system

    Chem. Rev.

    (2006)
  • D.K. Orren et al.

    The (A)BC excinuclease of Escherichia coli has only the UvrB and UvrC subunits in the incision complex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Macrophage activation highlight an important role for NER proteins in the survival, latency and multiplication of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

      2023, Tuberculosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides conserved helicase motifs, UvrB also possesses a β-hairpin for damage verification and an auxiliary TxGx motif. The alanine scanning, homology modelling, and molecular docking studies have deciphered that the amino acid residues of the TxGx motif line the DNA binding region and help in various catalytic functions of UvrB (Fig. 5) [126]. The biochemical analysis of the MtUvrB subunit indicates that: 1) MtUvrB exists as dimers in solution [124].

    • Interrogating the substrate specificity landscape of UvrC reveals novel insights into its non-canonical function

      2022, Biophysical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The mobile HJ, replication fork, 5ʹ-flap, and splayed duplex were made by annealing the specified 5′-32P-labeled ODN (with an asterisk) with an equal amount of the other cold ODNs (Tables 1 and S1). The annealing and gel purification of substrates were carried out as previously described (54,55,71). The cleavage reaction mixtures (20 μL) contained 75 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 1 mM DTT, 1 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, and 25,000 cpm of 32P-labeled DNA substrate and the indicated concentrations of MtUvrC.

    View full text