Abstract
Introduction
Neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur are rare. Still reported in developing countries, they lead to therapeutic issues. The objective of the study is to describe their characteristics and to propose treatment options.
Materials and methods
Ten years of ongoing study was held in our orthopedics department. All patients with a neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur after a knee trauma were included in the study. Pre-operative and post-operative data were collected and analyzed.
Results
A total of 13 cases of neglected traumatic epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur were found among 8616 in-patients of the department. It was mainly boys (9M/4F) around 16 years that were received 14 weeks after knee trauma. Most of the injuries were an AO-type 33-E/2.1 (Simple Salter-Harris’ type II) (n=12) distal femur malunion (n=10). Associated complications were cutaneous opening (n=7), superficial infection (n=4), deep infection (n=4). Fractures were management surgically (n=12) by an open osteoclasis procedure (n=9), debridement (n=7) and a thigh amputation (n=1). The outcome was better if an open osteoclasis procedure was early performed in closed distal femur mal-union with a complementary rehabilitation program.
Conclusion
Specialized trauma care facilities must be increased, and trauma education programs must be undertaken to avoid neglected epiphyseal fracture-separations of the distal femur in developing countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rathjen K, Birch J (2006) Physeal injuries and growth disturbances. In: Rockwood and Wilkins fractures in children, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 102–104
Shapiro F (2016) Epiphyseal growth plate fracture-separations. In: Pediatric Orthopedic Deformities, Volume 1. Springer, pp 505-612
Foucher JT (2007) Separations of the epiphyses. 1867. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:12-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803df190
Levinthal DH (1936) Old traumatic displacement of the distal femoral epiphysis: successful open reduction followed by epiphyseal arrest of the normal femur. J Bone Joint Surg 18(1):199–204
Gold E (1929) On the treatment of the separation of the lower epiphysis of the femur. Ann Surg 89:577–579
Larsen, P., Ceccotti, A.A. & Elsoe, R. High mortality following distal femur fractures: a cohort study including three hundred and two distal femur fractures. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04343-9
Sané A-D, Sané JC, Coulibaly NF, Diemé CB, Ndiaye A, Seye SIL (2012) Neglected Salter & Harris distal femoral fracture: reduction, osteotomy & fixation; a case report in Dakar. Orth Emerg Afr 1:46–48
Slongo T, Audigé L, Clavert J-M, Lutz N, Frick S, Hunter J (2007) The AO comprehensive classification of pediatric long-bone fractures: a web-based multicenter agreement study. J Pediatr Orthop 27(2):171–180
Slongo T, Audige L, Lutz N, Frick S, Schmittenbecher P, Hunter J, Clavert JM (2007) Documentation of fracture severity with the AO classification of pediatric long-bone fractures. Acta Orthop 78(2):247–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710013753
Salter RB, Harris WR (1963) Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg 45(3):587–622
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613
Arkader A, Warner WC Jr, Horn BD, Shaw RN, Wells L (2007) Predicting the outcome of physeal fractures of the distal femur. J Pediatr Orthop 27(6):703–708
Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P (2018) Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop 42(1):191–196
Ollier L (1867) Indications des résections sous-périostés dans les diverses lésions des os. In: Traité expérimental et clinique de la régénération des os et de la production artificielle du tissu osseux, vol 1. V. Masson et fils, Paris, pp 121-132
Foucher JET (2007) The classic: separations of the epiphyses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803df190
Czitrom AA, Salter RB, Willis RB (1981) Fractures involving the distal epiphyseal plate of the femur. Int Orthop 4(4):269–277
Koso RE, Terhoeve C, Steen RG, Zura R (2018) Healing, nonunion, and re-operation after internal fixation of diaphyseal and distal femoral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 42(11):2675–2683
Poland J (1898) Traumatic separation of the epiphysis. Smith Elder & CO, London
Garrett BR, Hoffman EB, Carrara H, Town C (2011) The effect of percutaneous pin fixation in the treatment of distal femoral physeal fractures. J Bone Joint [Br] 93-B:689–694. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.25422
Jain D, Arora R, Garg R, Mahindra P, Selhi HS (2019) Functional outcome of open distal femoral fractures managed with lateral locking plates. Int Orthop:1-9
Dang KH, Armstrong CA, Karia RA, Zelle BA (2019) Outcomes of distal femur fractures treated with the Synthes 4.5 mm VA-LCP Curved Condylar Plate. Int Orthop 43(7):1709–1714
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Diallo, M., Soulama, M., Hema, A.E. et al. Management of neglected distal femur epiphyseal fracture-separation. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 545–550 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04450-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04450-7