The effect of using pig manure as an internal carbon source in a traditional piggery wastewater treatment system for biological denitrification
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Piggery wastewater is organic wastewater containing high concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). Its direct discharge into natural water will lead to eutrophication of water bodies, endangering the aquatic environment and ecosystem and posing a serious threat to human health (Yu and Cao, 2014; Lin et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2018). At present, anaerobic digestion is widely used to reduce organic pollution and generate biogas for power generation (Hamelin et al., 2011). However, NH3-N cannot be removed by anaerobic digestion, and the concentration of NH3-N in anaerobic digestion effluent is therefore high. Due to the shortage of land resources in South China, the construction of numerous natural treatment systems for the removal of biogas slurry is not possible, and the adoption of aerobic treatment of digested piggery wastewater is necessary. Traditionally, aerobic treatment often uses a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) activated sludge process with simple and convenient operation (Deng et al., 2008; Song et al., 2011; Scaglione et al., 2013; Meng et al., 2016). However, most of the biodegradable COD is removed during anaerobic digestion (Bernet and Beline, 2009), which results in a low ratio of COD to TN (COD/TN) in anaerobic digestion effluent and poor biodegradability in subsequent treatment. In the traditional piggery wastewater A/O (anoxic/aerobic) process or SBR process, NH3-N in the wastewater is oxidized by nitrifying bacteria to NO2-N and NO3-N in the aerobic tank. However, when wastewater enters the anoxic tank, there is often no carbon source in the anoxic tank, resulting in the lack of an electron donor in the denitrification process. A large amount of NO2-N and NO3-N cannot be degraded, resulting in a low TN removal rate. At the same time, high concentrations of NO2-N and NO3-N in wastewater are toxic, and direct discharge to natural water bodies can cause toxicity to aquatic organisms.
To address the lack of a carbon source in digested piggery wastewater and low denitrification, many researchers have directly added carbon sources to increase the COD/TN and enhance the denitrification process, so that NO2-N and NO3-N are converted to N2, thereby reducing the NO2-N and NO3-N content of the effluent, improving the TN removal rate, and finally achieving nitrogen removal. Generally, two sources of carbon have been used. Direct addition of commercial carbon sources such as glucose, methanol (Jin et al., 2014), acetic acid (Obaja et al., 2003) and sodium acetate (Martin et al., 2009) has resulted in increased denitrification, but these commodity carbon sources are expensive, which limits their application. Adding carbon sources prepared from waste, such as sludge hydrolysate (Tong and Chen, 2007; Soares et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2016), hydrolytic acidification solution from food waste (Tang et al., 2019) and 30% undigested piggery wastewater (Deng et al., 2005), significantly improved the denitrification performance. However, these carbon sources are limited, and their transport is difficult. Adding 30% undigested piggery wastewater adds a large amount of NH3-N and increases aeration but also increases the construction investment, resulting in high operating costs. Therefore, in consideration of realistic piggery conditions, it is important to find a carbon source that can be taken from local materials, is economically effective and can be added in low amounts for the biological denitrification of piggery wastewater.
Both ultrasonication and alkali treatment technologies can effectively disrupt the sludge floc structure and microbial cell walls, releasing intracellular storage polymers and soluble matter (Braeutigam et al., 2014). Related studies have shown that combining these two technologies increases SCOD dissolution (Yang et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2010; Seng et al., 2010). At present, ultrasonication/alkali pretreatment mainly focuses on the treatment of waste activated sludge (WAS) to promote anaerobic digestion to produce biogas(Chu et al., 2001; Tiehm et al., 2001; Nickel and Neis, 2007; Xie et al., 2009). However, research on ultrasonication/alkali treatment of pig manure to produce an internal carbon source and increase biological denitrification in traditional piggery wastewater has not been reported in either domestic or foreign research. Elbeshbishy et al. (Elbeshbishy et al., 2011) found that pig manure is more suitable for ultrasonication treatment than WAS and that the release effect of SCOD was improved with pig manure with the same energy. Carbon sources with increased SCOD are improve subsequent biological treatment. This indicates that the ultrasonication/alkali treatment of pig manure to produce an internal carbon source and increase biological denitrification in traditional piggery wastewater is feasible.
In this experiment, pig manure was pretreated with ultrasonication and an alkali to prepare a PMC source with a high concentration of SCOD, and the PMC source was added to digested piggery wastewater to increase denitrification. The effects of the ultrasonic energy density, ultrasonic time and pH on the release of SCOD from pig manure and the effect of PMC addition on biological denitrification and microbial community structure in subsequent biological treatment in an SBR were evaluated. The main goals were to prepare an economical and effective carbon source to increase the denitrification in digested piggery wastewater, to reduce the treatment cost of pig farm wastewater and to provide an economic, feasible and low-cost method for application to biological denitrification in piggery wastewater.
Section snippets
Experimental material
Test water: Digested piggery wastewater was obtained from an HDPE-covered lagoon digester (length×width×depth of 83 × 30 × 6 m; hydraulic residence time of >60 d) at the Yan Tang Piggery in Guangzhou. This piggery has approximately 2500 live pigs, and the pig manure is removed by water flushing. After sampling, the larger scum was removed by filtration through a 5 mm sieve, and the samples were stored at 4 °C. Samples were diluted to a certain concentration to serve as the test influent.The
Effect of ultrasonication/alkali pretreatment on the preparation of PMC
The effect of SCOD release was used as the basis for optimization of the combined ultrasonication/alkali pretreatment of pig manure to prepare PMC. The pig manure was placed under different ultrasonic energy densities, ultrasonic times and pH values in the combined treatment. The experimental results are shown in Fig. 2.
As shown in Fig. 2-a, there was a positive correlation between the concentration of SCOD and ultrasonic energy density. The SCOD with an unadjusted pH increased from 9209.30 mg·L
Conclusion
In the biological treatment, the TN removal percentage with the addition of PMC reached 72.29%, which was 62.29% higher than that obtained without an added carbon source and 36.74% higher than that obtained with the addition of RWC. It shows that adding PMC can significantly increase biological denitrification in piggery wastewater. High-throughput sequencing of the microbial population before and after the addition of a carbon source revealed that the dominant microflora with added PMC were
Declaration of competing interest
None.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Special Fund Project for Agricultural Development and Rural Work in Guangdong Province, China (2017LM4169 and 2018LM2151) and Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China (2019B030301007).
References (47)
- et al.
Challenges and innovations on biological treatment of livestock effluents
Journa
(2009) - et al.
Degradation of carbamazepine in environmentally relevant concentrations in water by Hydrodynamic-Acoustic-Cavitation (HAC)
Journa
(2012) - et al.
Effect of ultrasound amplitude and reaction time on the anaerobic fermentation of chicken manure for biogas production
Journa
(2014) - et al.
Observations on changes in ultrasonically treated waste-activated sludge
Journa
(2001) - et al.
Improvement in post-treatment of digested swine wastewater
Journa
(2008) - et al.
Impact of ultrasonication of hog manure on anaerobic digestability
Journa
(2011) - et al.
Comparison of nitrogen removal and microbial properties in solid-phase denitrification systems for water purification with various pretreated lignocellulosic carriers
Journa
(2017) - et al.
Denitrification of simulated municipal wastewater treatment plant effluent using a three-dimensional biofilm-electrode reactor: operating performance and bacterial community
Journa
(2013) - et al.
Combined (alkaline + ultrasonic) pretreatment effect on sewage sludge disintegration
Journa
(2010) - et al.
Selective release of phosphorus and nitrogen from waste activated sludge with combined thermal and alkali treatment
Journa
(2015)
Economic and environmental evaluation of nitrogen removal and recovery methods from wastewater
Journa
Microbial community analysis and performance of a phosphate-removing activated sludge
Journa
The use of fermentation liquid of wastewater primary sedimentation sludge as supplemental carbon source for denitrification based on enhanced anaerobic fermentation
Journa
Bacterial community compositions of coking wastewater treatment plants in steel industry revealed by Illumina high-throughput sequencing
Journa
Acetate and ethanol as potential enhancers of low temperature denitrification in soil contaminated by fur farms: a pilot-scale study
Journa
Ultrasonic disintegration of biosolids for improved biodegradation
Journa
Nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphorus removal in piggery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor
Journa
Effects of carbon source on denitrification efficiency and microbial community structure in a saline wastewater treatment process
Journa
Nitrification denitrification via nitrite in a pilot-scale SBR treating the liquid fraction of co-digested piggery/poultry manure and agro-wastes
Journa
Comparison between disintegrated and fermented sewage sludge for production of a carbon source suitable for biological nutrient removal
Journa
Nutrients removal and recovery from anaerobically digested swine wastewater by struvite crystallization without chemical additions
Journa
Nitrogen removal enhancement using lactic acid fermentation products from food waste as external carbon sources: Performance and microbial communities
Journa
Nutrients removal performance and sludge properties using anaerobic fermentation slurry from food waste as an external carbon source for wastewater treatment
Journa
Cited by (23)
Pyrolysis recycling of pig manure biochar adsorption material for decreasing ammonia nitrogen in biogas slurry
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentEvaluation of Phanerochaete chrysosporium for swine wastewater treatment
2022, Biochemical Engineering JournalCitation Excerpt :Consequently, the volume of swine wastes generated by this sector has been increased. The swine wastewater is a farming effluent resulting from the mixture of pig manure, urine and the water used to clean the pigsty, which is characterized for its high nitrogen, phosphorus, colour and organic matter concentration. [2,3]. Swine wastewater usually has a high content of organic materials in the form of volatile solids (VS).
Sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and anoxic and oxic process (A/O) display opposite performance for pollutant removal in treating digested effluent of swine wastewater with low and high COD/N ratios
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :In stage IV (with 40% of raw wastewater was added), the highest TN removal performances of the A/O and SBR were 75.9% and 90.2%, respectively. These results were greater than Luo et al. (2020)'s report, who used pretreated pig manure as carbon source and added to digested piggery wastewater, achieving a TN removal percentage of 72.3%. However, some pig plant may have trouble justifying the extra cost for pretreatment process of pig manure.
Comparative analysis of nitrogen removals and microbial communities in air and pure oxygen aeration systems during treatment of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) leachate
2022, Journal of Water Process EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The abundance of g_f_NS9_marine_group was 19.62–20.00% and 24.44–25.08% in AAT and POAT, respectively, the highest among the identified genera. It was an unclassified bacterium affiliated to Bacteroidetes and often presented in the biological nitrogen removal facilities [50,51]. In the hierarchical cluster analysis, the top 20 genera were obviously divided into two clusters, suggesting the structure of microbial communities was greatly affected by the ways of different aeration.
An innovative method for the fractionation and pretreatment of pig farm biogas slurry by ultrafiltration
2022, Journal of Water Process EngineeringMagnesium-modified biochar was used to adsorb phosphorus from wastewater and used as a phosphorus source to be recycled to reduce the ammonia nitrogen of piggery digestive wastewater
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Because there were more refractory organic compounds in SBR-CK and insufficient easily degradable organic compounds as electron donors for denitrifying bacteria, it had insufficient carbon sources for denitrifying bacteria to remove nitrous nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen. These conditions hindered the SBR-CK denitrification process (Luo et al., 2020a), thus causing the accumulation of NO2–N in SBR-CK, and ultimately, the outlet TN of SBR-CK did not meet the standard. However, over 3 days of operation, the SBR-T effluent TN concentration basically remained between 5.53 and 19.35 mg/L, and the removal percentage kept stable at approximately 95%.