Elsevier

Ecological Engineering

Volume 143, 15 January 2020, 105687
Ecological Engineering

Optimal selection of hydraulic indexes with classical test theory to compare hydraulic performance of constructed wetlands

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.105687Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Inconsistencies within hydraulic indexes were revealed.

  • Hydraulic indexes were optimized to represent hydraulic performance.

  • Compatibility, discrimination, difficulty of hydraulic indexes was compared.

  • Mutual relationships of hydraulic indexes were also studied.

  • Three hydraulic indexes are recommended.

Abstract

Residence time distributions (RTDs), obtained from tracer experiments, are one of the main tools for investigating the hydraulic performance of constructed wetlands. However, the existence of various hydraulic indexes derived from RTDs has led to inconsistency in their application for comparing the hydraulic performance. In this work, eight hydraulic indexes were initially selected based on their popularity, and then divided into three categories: hydraulic efficiency indexes (HEIs) (λm, λe, λp, and MI), short-circuiting indexes (SIs) (t5 and t10), and mixing indexes (MIs) ( σ2 and Morril index). Then, the hydraulic indexes were optimized for compatibility, discrimination, difficulty, and their mutual relationships between different categories. The results showed large inconsistencies among HEIs, and small inconsistencies among SIs and MIs. Among the four HEIs, λe performed best in terms of compatibility, discrimination, and difficulty. Among SIs, t5 and t10 differed little in the three aforementioned aspects. Among MIs, the Morril index performed better than σ2 in terms of discrimination and difficulty. The significant correlation between short-circuiting flow and hydraulic efficiency highlights the necessity of reducing short-circuiting flow. Within each category, λe, t10, and the Morril index are recommended to quantify hydraulic efficiency, short-circuiting flow, and mixing flow, respectively. This study brings clarity to the application of hydraulic indexes and provides uniform standards for the quantification of hydraulic performance.

Introduction

Flow pattern inside constructed wetlands (CWs) is identified to affect pollutants removal rates significantly (Schuetz et al., 2012; Wahl et al., 2010). Normally, flow in CWs is assumed to be ideal in the form of either plug flow or completely mixed flow (Persson et al., 1999). In plug flow, all fluid particles move from inlet to outlet with the same velocity. In completely mixed flow, fluid properties are spatially and temporally uniform within CWs. However, neither of these ideal conditions is achievable in the field; actual flow is represented best as a combination of plug flow and several continuously stirred tank reactors (Persson et al., 1999; Teixeira and Siqueira, 2008. Tracer experiments can reveal actual flow pattern within CWs and residence time distributions (RTDs), obtained from tracer experiments, are one of main tools investigating hydraulic performance of CWs (Khan et al., 2013). Numerous studies about the effect of CW design on hydraulic performance (Headley and Kadlec, 2007; Holland et al., 2004; Ioannidou and Pearson, 2019; Nuel et al., 2017; Sabokrouhiyeh et al., 2017; Schuetz et al., 2012) use various hydraulic index to compare hydraulic performance.

However, the existence of various hydraulic indexes derived from RTDs led to inconsistency in their application to compare hydraulic performance of CWs. The diversity of hydraulic indexes is shown in their different categories. Teixeira and Siqueira, 2008 collected 14 hydraulic indexes, and divided them into short-circuiting index (SI) and mixing index (MI) with 8 and 6 indexes included, respectively, according to their physical meaning. Wahl (2013) collected 16 indexes and categorized as single value indexes, composite indexes, global indexes, conditional probability functions according to their definition formula. Stamou and Noutsopoulos (1994) also divided hydraulic indexes into four categories, namely SI, MI, the degree of plug flow, and efficiency. Hence, in the study of effect of CW design (water depth, wetland shape, the aspect ratio, number and position of obstacles, vegetation and climate) on hydraulic performance of CWs (Ioannidou and Pearson, 2019), there is little consistency in the application of hydraulic indexes and researchers have different preference for hydraulic indexes (Bodin et al., 2012; Guzman et al., 2018; Holland et al., 2004; Persson et al., 1999). Moreover, different hydraulic indexes may render inconsistent conclusions. For example, Khan et al. (2013) obtained inconsistent ranks of CWs in hydraulic efficiency according two hydraulic efficiency indexes (HEIs) when studying how the layout of floating CW affected hydraulic performance.

Confronted with this situation, we urgently need to optimize the hydraulic indexes to appropriately represent the hydraulic performance. In this paper, eight hydraulic indexes were firstly selected, which were then divided into three categories based on their physical meaning. These hydraulic indexes were then evaluated using classical test theory (CTT) for compatibility, discrimination, and difficulty. Finally, relationships between hydraulic indexes in the different categories were explored. This paper can bring clarity to the application of hydraulic indexes derived from RTDs, and provide uniform standards for the quantification of the hydraulic performance of CWs.

Section snippets

Data sources

Many RTDs covering a wide range of hydraulic performance are needed for such research. Previously, Teixeira and Siqueira (2008) obtained these RTDs by tracer experiments conducted on five significantly different types of CWs. However, those CWs were unique and did not represent the diversity of CWs. The better option is to acquire these RTDs through tracer experiments on CWs under different factors, because CWs under different factors, such as layout of inlet and outlet, vegetation, aspect

Results

For revelation of inconsistency of hydraulic indexes, CWs were firstly ranked according to their value. Then, compatibility, discrimination, and difficulty of hydraulic indexes were evaluated by CTT. Finally, the relationships between HEIs and SIs, MIs were explored, as well as the relationships between SIs and MIs.

Analysis of hydraulic efficiency indexes

The characteristics of HEIs were explored to explain connection between them. Traditionally, the range of λm is between zero and one, meaning that the average residence time is not greater than the nominal residence time. However, of the CWs surveyed, there are four for which λm exceeds unity. Kjellin et al. (2007) reasoned that such a situation would be due to errors in measuring the flow rate and volume. Bodin et al. (2013) found that λm could exceed one when a tracer experiment was ended at 3

Conclusions

Eight hydraulic indexes were selected and classified as HEIs, SIs, MIs. Inconsistency of hydraulic indexes was revealed using ranks of wetlands, based on a large number of RTDs. Hydraulic indexes were optimized so as to represent the hydraulic performance. Compatibility, discrimination, and difficulty of hydraulic indexes were evaluated using CTT. The relationships between HEIs, SIs and MIs were analyzed. A significant correlation between short-circuiting flow and hydraulic efficiency was

Author contributions section

Junjie Liu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing-Original draft preparation,

Bin Dong: Writing-Review and Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Wangzi Zhou: Data curation, Investigation.

Zhongdong Qian: Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Natural Science Fundation of China under Grant No. 51779181. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The data and parameters used in this study are listed in the manuscript, supporting information, or available from the cited public sources. The supporting information additionally provides

References (42)

  • V.G. Ioannidou et al.

    The effects of flow rate variation and vegetation ageing on the longitudinal mixing and residence time distribution (RTD) in a full-scale constructed wetland

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2019)
  • J. Kjellin et al.

    Controlling factors for water residence time and flow patterns in Ekeby treatment wetland, Sweden

    Adv. Water Resour.

    (2007)
  • L. Latrach et al.

    Optimization of hydraulic efficiency and wastewater treatment performances using a new design of vertical flow Multi-Soil-Layering (MSL) technology

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2018)
  • J. Laurent et al.

    Systemic models of full-scale surface flow treatment wetlands : determination by application of fluorescent tracers

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2015)
  • O. Levenspiel et al.

    Patterns of flow in chemical process vessels

    Adv. Chem. Eng.

    (1964)
  • A.Y.C. Lin et al.

    Comparison of rhodamine WT and bromide in the determination of hydraulic characteristics of constructed wetlands

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2003)
  • J.J. Liu et al.

    Variations of effective volume and removal rate under different water levels of constructed wetland

    Ecol. Eng.

    (2016)
  • C. Maucieri et al.

    A review on the main affecting factors of greenhouse gases emission in constructed wetlands

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2017)
  • M. Nuel et al.

    Seasonal and ageing effects on SFTW hydrodynamics study by full-scale tracer experiments and dynamic time warping algorithms

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • F.R. Ouedraogo et al.

    Impact of sludge layer geometry on the hydraulic performance of a waste stabilization pond

    Water Res.

    (2016)
  • J. Persson et al.

    Hydraulics efficiency of constructed wetlands and ponds

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Correction of residence time distributions and hydraulic indexes affected by tracer release duration in surface flow constructed wetlands

      2021, Journal of Hydrology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Brooks and Wise (2005) quantified the moment uncertainties of RTDs due to the random errors in tracer concentration measurements and found that the uncertainties were more sensitive to concentration error than they were to volume errors. Liu et al. (2020) screened the hydraulic indexes which were not easily disturbed by RTD errors from the perspective of numerical consistency of hydraulic indexes. Although these studies have contributed to the guidance of tracer experiments and RTD data processing, few of them involved the inaccuracy and correction of RTDs and hydraulic indexes caused by the unreasonable behavior of tracer release experiments.

    • Flow uniformity metrics for quantifying the hydraulic and treatment performance of constructed wetlands

      2020, Ecological Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      In our cases, the correlation coefficient is 0.69, and the short-circuiting flow area is relatively small (0.01 < SC < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 3d. The significant correlation between short-circuiting flow and mixing highlights the profound effect on hydraulic performance (Liu et al., 2020), indicating the necessity of reducing short-circuiting flow (Guzman et al., 2018). We used the moment index (MI), Morril index (Mo), and the 5% normalized time (t5), which were presented by Wahl et al. (2010) and Farjood et al. (2015), to evaluate the hydraulic performance and the related short-circuiting.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text