Abstract
Analyses of stochastic simulations methods for Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth earthquake recorded at seismic station INCERC Bucharest were made. The main research topic highlighted in this paper is the quest for the best model able to simulate the influence of the local site conditions considering to this aim different types of soil behavior. Two types of linear behavior and one type of nonlinear behavior of the soil layers were considered to investigate the site effects. Comparisons between the simulations and the recorded accelerograms and between the simulation methods were made in terms of amplitude parameters, frequency content, duration parameters, and energy release. A better approximation was found when the nonlinear behavior of the soil layers was employed.
References
Benetatos CA, Kiratzi AA (2004) Stochastic strong ground motion simulation of intermediate depth earthquakes: the cases of the 30 May 1990 Vrancea (Romania) and of the 22 January 2002 Karpathos island (Greece) earthquakes. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24(1):1–9
Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1998) FINSIM--a FORTRAN Program for simulating stochastic acceleration time histories from finite faults. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.69.1.27
Boore DM (2003) Simulation of groundmotion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–676
Boore DM (2005) SMSIM-Fortran programs for simulating ground motions form earthquakes. Version 7.04. U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-Field Report. pp. 55
Boore DM (2009) Comparing stochastic point-source and finite-source ground-motion simulations: SMSIM and EXSIM. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3202-3216
Constantinescu L, Enescu E (1985) Vrancea earthquakes from scientific and technologic point of view. “Academiei” Editing House.
EXSIM Online Software (n.d.) http://www.daveboore.com/. Accessed 01 September 2018
Ganas A, Grecu B, Batsi E, Radulian M (2010) Vrancea slab earthquake triggerd by static stress transfer. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2565–2577
Gusev A, Radulian M, Rizescu M, Panza GF (2002) Source scaling of intermediate-depth Vrancea earthquakes. Geophys J Int 151(3):879–889. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01816.x
Haghshenas E, Bard PY, Theodoulidis N, SESAME WP04 Team (2008) Empirical evaluation of microtremor H/V spectral ratio. Bull Earthq Eng 6:78–108
Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D (2016) DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kotke AR, Rathje EM (2009) Technical manual for Strata. PEER Report 2008/10, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
Martin M, Wenzel F (2006) High-resolution teleseismic body wave tomography beneath SE-Romania (II): imaging of a slab detachment scenario. Geophys J Int 164(3):579–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02884.x
Motazedian D, Atkinson GM (2005) Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:995–1010
Oncescu MC, Bonjer KP (1997) A note on the depth recurrence and strain release of large Vrancea earthquakes. Tectonophysics. 272:291–302
Oth A, Wenzel F, Radulian M (2007) Source parameters of intermediate-depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes from empirical Green’s functions modeling. Tectonophysics. 438(1-4):33–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2007.02.016
Oth A, Parolai S, Bindi D, Wenzel F (2009) Source spectra and site response from S waves of intermediate-depth Vrancea, Romania, earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:235–254
Pavel F (2015) Investigation on the stochastic simulation of strong ground motions for Bucharest area. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.11.008
Pavel F (2017) Investigation on the variability of simulated and observed ground motions for Bucharest Area. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1297266
Pavel F, Văcăreanu R (2015a) Assessment of the ground motion levels for the Vrancea (Romania) November 1940 earthquake. Nat Hazards 78:1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1767-x
Pavel F, Văcăreanu R (2015b) Kappa and regional attenuation for Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. J Seismol 19(3):791–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-015-9490-3
Pavel F, Vacareanu R (2017) Ground motion simulations for seismic stations in southern and eastern Romania and seismic hazard assessment. J Seismol 21:1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9649-1
Pavel F, Popa V, Vacareanu F (2018) Evaluation of soil conditions in Bucharest, In book: Impact of long-period ground motions on structural design: a case study for Bucharest, Romania, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73402-6_2
Pitilakis K (2004) Chapter 5: Site effects. In: Ansal A (ed) Recent advances in earthquake geotechnical engineering and microzonation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp 139–198
Radulian M, Bala A, Ardeleanu L, Toma-Danila D, Petrescu L, Popescu E (2019) Revised catalogue of earthquake mechanisms for the events occurred in Romania until the end of twentieth century: REFMC. Acta Geodaetica Geophys 54(1):3–18
Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses. Report EERC 70-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley
SMSIM Online Software (n.d.) http://www.daveboore.com/. Accessed 01 September 2018
Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Wenzel F, Grecu B, Radulian M (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the intermediate depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):367–388
Vucetic M, Dobry R (1991) Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. J Geotech Eng 117:89–107
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coțovanu, A., Vacareanu, R. Local site conditions modeling in stochastic simulation of ground motions generated by Vrancea (Romania) intermediate-depth seismic source. J Seismol 24, 229–241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09892-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-019-09892-5