Skip to main content
Log in

On the role of diffractions in velocity model building: a full-waveform inversion example

  • Published:
Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imaging of small-scale heterogeneities is important for the geological exploration in complex environments. It requires a processing sequence tuned to high-resolution model building. Conventional methods which use refractions or reflections might face problems in resolving small-scale features since they are visually close to the resolution of the reflection images. Additional information or an unconventional technology, which supports the reflection imaging, is thus of great interest. An unconventional method based on seismic diffractions naturally complements specular reflection imaging. Diffracted waves represent a direct seismic response from small-scale subsurface heterogeneities, such as inclusions with a characteristic size of the prevailing wavelength, or discontinuities in geological interfaces, such as faults and fractures. We investigate the rule of diffracted part of the wavefield on velocity model building using a full-waveform inversion (FWI) example. In order to best acknowledge refracted and reflected parts of the wavefield in FWI, we chose a synthetic data example which mimics the ocean-bottom nodes acquisition survey as it provides almost perfect conditions for FWI of diving waves, a standard tool for high-resolution model building. We show, that FWI using diving waves produces a well-resolved anomaly. Including other part of the wavefield, reflected waves, further improves the resolution of the velocity anomaly but also leads to a gentle overfitting due to missing illumination from the very steep anomaly flanks. Considering diffracted events in FWI improves the model resolution even further resulting in a detailed velocity model and correctly imaged anomaly in both vertical and lateral directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer A., Schwarz B. and Gajewski D., 2017. Utilizing diffractions in wave-front tomography. Geophysics, 82, R65–R73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billette F. and Lambaré G., 1998. Velocity macro-model estimation by stereotomography. Geophys. J. Int., 135, 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleistein N., 1984. Mathematical Methods for Wave Phenomena. Academic Press Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broyden C.G., 1970. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms. J. Inst. Math. Appl., 6, 76–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell S. and Gajewski D., 2011. Common-reflection-surface-based workflow for diffraction imaging. Geophysics, 76, S187–S195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grion S., Exley R., Manin M., Miao X., Pica A.L., Wang Y., Granger P. and Ronen S., 2007. Mirror imaging of OBS data. First Break, 25, 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaidukov V., Landa E. and Moser T.J., 2004. Diffraction imaging by focusing-defocusing: An outlook on seismic superresolution. Geophysics, 69, 1478–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klem-Musatov K., 1994. Theory of Seismic Diffractions. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kosloff D., Queiroz Filho A., Tessmer E. and Behle A., 1989. Numerical solution of the acoustic and elastic wave equations by a new rapid expansion method. Geophys. Prospect., 37, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambaré G., Virieux J., Madariaga R. and Jin S., 1992. Iterative asymptotic inversion in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics, 57, 1138–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung S. and Qian J., 2006. An adjoint state method for three-dimensional transmission traveltime tomography using first-arrivals. Commun. Math. Sci., 4, 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestana R. and Stoffa P.L., 2009. Rapid expansion method (REM) for time-stepping in reverse time migration (RTM). SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 28, 2819–2823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plessix R.E., 2006. A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications. Geophys. J. Int., 167, 495–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S.-C. and Zhou H.-M., 2016. Re-exploration into migration of seismic data. Chinese J. Geophys., 59, 54–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.20213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trad D., 2011. Five-dimensional interpolation: Recovering from acquisition constraints. Geophysics, 74, V123–V132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y.H.R., Cheng L.T., Osher S. and Zhao H.K., 2003. Fast sweeping algorithms for a class of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 41, 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virieux J. and Operto S., 2009. An overview of full-waveform inversion in exploration geophysics. Geophysics, 74, WC11–W26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel C.R., 2002. Computational Methods for Inverse Problems. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics 23. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Wang G.C., Wang S.X., Song J.Y., Dong C.H. and Zhang M.Q., 2018. Elastic reflection traveltime inversion with decoupled wave equation. Geophysics, 83, R463–R474, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0631.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner M., Ratcliffe A., Nangoo T., Morgan J., Umpleby A., Shah N., Vinje V., Stekl I., Guasch L., Win C., Conroy G. and Bertrand A., 2013. Anisotropic 3D full-waveform inversion. Geophysics, 78, R59–R80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R.-S. and Nafı Toksöz M., 1987. Diffraction tomography and multi-source holography applied to seismic imaging. Geophysics, 52, 11–25,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y. and Gajewski D., 2017. 5-D interpolation with wave-front attributes. Geophys. J. Int., 211, 897–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan S.Y., Wang S.X., Luo Y.N., Wei W.W. and Wang G.C., 2019. Impedance inversion by using the low-frequency full-waveform inversion result as an a priori model. Geophysics, 84, R149–R164, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0643.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H.R., 2004. A fast sweeping method for eikonal equations. Math. Comput., 74, 603–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Znak P., Kashtan B. and Gajewski D., 2018. Velocity model building by geometrical spreading focusing. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018, 5188–5192, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2018-2997331.1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank members of the Applied Seismic Group, University of Hamburg, and Applied and Earthquake Seismology Group, FU Berlin, for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergius Dell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dell, S., Abakumov, I., Znak, P. et al. On the role of diffractions in velocity model building: a full-waveform inversion example. Stud Geophys Geod 63, 538–553 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0733-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-019-0733-6

Keywords

Navigation