Skip to main content
Log in

Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Although the advantages of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the direct anterior approach (DAA) have been well documented, DAA in the supine position is limited by the difficulty in exposing the acetabulum and femur, which may result in implant malpositioning and intra-operative complications. Recent studies have reported that DAA-THA in the lateral position can achieve satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in implant alignment between two patient cohorts that underwent primary THA by DAA and the traditional posterolateral approach (PLA) in the lateral position.

Methods

A total of 208 THAs (110 using DAA and 98 using PLA) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The cup anteversion angle was closer to the target anteversion angle, and the accuracy of cup orientation was superior in the DAA group. A total of 82 (74.5%) DAA-THA and 56 (57.1%) PLA-THA cases showed successful inclination and anteversion angles (p = 0.008) of the implant. In addition, 90 (81.8%) DAA-THA and 67 (68.4%) PLA-THA cases had successful anteversion angle (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of successful inclination angle (98 vs. 81, p = 0.181), as well as in the stem alignment in both coronal and sagittal planes.

Conclusion

THA using DAA in the lateral position can achieve superior cup orientation compared to PLA while maintaining the stem alignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplast 24:698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia F, Guo B, Xu F, Hou Y, Tang X, Huang L (2018) A comparison of clinical, radiographic and surgical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty between direct anterior and posterior approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int 31:1120700018820652. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018820652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang Z, Hou JZ, Wu CH, Zhou YJ, Gu XM, Wang HH, Feng W, Cheng YX, Sheng X, Bao HW (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 13:229. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0929-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP (2013) Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brismar BH, Hallert O, Tedhamre A, Lindgren JU (2018) Early gain in pain reduction and hip function, but more complications following the direct anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial of 100 patients with 5 years of follow up. Acta Orthop 89:484–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1504505

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed MM, Otto TJ, Moed BR (2016) Anterior total hip arthroplasty using a metaphyseal bone-sparing stem: component alignment and early complications. J Orthop Surg Res 22:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0383-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawarai Y, Iida S, Nakamura J, Shinada Y, Suzuki C, Ohtori S (2017) Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? Comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position. Int Orthop 41:2487–2493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3521-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi H, Homma Y, Baba T, Ochi H, Matsumoto M, Yuasa T, Kaneko K (2016) Surgeons changing the approach for total hip arthroplasty from posterior to direct anterior with fluoroscopy should consider potential excessive cup anteversion and flexion implantation of the stem in their early experience. Int Orthop 40:1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3059-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe H, Sakai T, Takao M, Nishii T, Nakamura N, Sugano N (2015) Difference in stem alignment between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 30:1761–1766.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF (2002) Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: a multivariate analysis. J Arthroplast 17:282–288. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.30286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Melman WP, Mollen BP, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CC (2015) First experiences with the direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position: learning curve and 1 year complication rate. Hip Int 25:251–257. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen M, Luo Z, Ji X, Cheng P, Tang G, Shang X (2017) Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in the lateral decubitus position: our experiences and early results. J Arthroplast 32:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip re-placement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplast 19:387–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xifu Shang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This retrospective study was conducted in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration and was approved by Anhui Provincial Hospital review board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 49 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, F., Shang, X., Zhang, X. et al. Direct anterior approach in lateral position achieves superior cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty: a radiological comparative study of two consecutive series. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 44, 453–459 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04461-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04461-4

Keywords

Navigation