Abstract
Purpose
Even though the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common spinal procedures, a consensus on the real need for prescribing a cervical collar (CC) after surgery is still missing. In fact, the role of external immobilization in decreasing non-fusion rate and implants displacement has not been clarified yet.
Methods
This study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Six different online medical databases were screened. Papers reporting the neck disability index (NDI), cervical range of motion (RoM) and fusion rate after ACDF without plating, on single or multiple levels, for cervical spondylosis were considered for eligibility.
Results
There were no significant differences in terms of NDI scores at 2 weeks (WMD = 4.502; 95% CI − 5.953, 14.957; p = 0.399; I2 = 65.14%; p = 0.090) and 1-year (WMD = 2.052; 95% CI − 1.386, 5.490 p = 0.242; I2 = 0%; p = 0.793), RoM reduction at 1-year (WMD = 1.597; 95% CI − 5.886, 9.079; p = 0.676; I2 = 0%; p = 0.326) or fusion rate (OR = 1.127; 95% CI 0.387, 3.282; p = 0.827; I2 = 2.166%; p = 0.360).
Conclusions
The use of a CC after ACDF without plating on single or double levels for cervical spondylosis seems not supported by scientific evidence.
Graphic abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J et al (2018) Open-versus French-Door Laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 117:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.026
Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J et al (2018) Skip Laminectomy compared with laminoplasty for cervical compressive myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 120:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.231
Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M et al (2018) Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am 29:115–127.e35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.020
Tetreault LA, Karadimas S, Wilson JR et al (2017) The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the rate of hospitalization following spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review. Glob Spine J 7:28S–34S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217700396
Montano N, Ricciardi L, Olivi A (2019) Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. World Neurosurg 130:530–536.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.144
Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF (2010) Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001466.pub3
Scerrati A, Visani J, Norri N et al (2019) Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5
Abbott A, Halvorsen M, Dedering A (2013) Is there a need for cervical collar usage post anterior cervical decompression and fusion using interbody cages? A randomized controlled pilot trial. Physiother Theory Pract 29:290–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2012.731627
Overley SC, Merrill RK, Baird EO et al (2018) Is cervical bracing necessary after one- and two-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A prospective randomized study. Glob Spine J 8:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217697318
Karikari I, Ghogawala Z, Ropper AE et al (2018) Utility of cervical collars following cervical fusion surgery. Does it improve fusion rates or outcomes? A systematic review. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.066
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Ricciardi L, Stifano V, D’Arrigo S et al (2019) The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06035-9
Lauretti WJ (2012) Chapter 10—the safety and effectiveness of common treatments for whiplash. In: Gatterman MI (ed) Whiplash. Mosby, Saint Louis, pp 169–178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ricciardi, L., Scerrati, A., Olivi, A. et al. The role of cervical collar in functional restoration and fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating on single or double levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 29, 955–960 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06270-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06270-0