Skip to main content
Log in

The role of cervical collar in functional restoration and fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating on single or double levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Even though the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common spinal procedures, a consensus on the real need for prescribing a cervical collar (CC) after surgery is still missing. In fact, the role of external immobilization in decreasing non-fusion rate and implants displacement has not been clarified yet.

Methods

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. Six different online medical databases were screened. Papers reporting the neck disability index (NDI), cervical range of motion (RoM) and fusion rate after ACDF without plating, on single or multiple levels, for cervical spondylosis were considered for eligibility.

Results

There were no significant differences in terms of NDI scores at 2 weeks (WMD = 4.502; 95% CI − 5.953, 14.957; p = 0.399; I2 = 65.14%; p = 0.090) and 1-year (WMD = 2.052; 95% CI − 1.386, 5.490 p = 0.242; I2 = 0%; p = 0.793), RoM reduction at 1-year (WMD = 1.597; 95% CI − 5.886, 9.079; p = 0.676; I2 = 0%; p = 0.326) or fusion rate (OR = 1.127; 95% CI 0.387, 3.282; p = 0.827; I2 = 2.166%; p = 0.360).

Conclusions

The use of a CC after ACDF without plating on single or double levels for cervical spondylosis seems not supported by scientific evidence.

Graphic abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J et al (2018) Open-versus French-Door Laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 117:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luo W, Li Y, Zhao J et al (2018) Skip Laminectomy compared with laminoplasty for cervical compressive myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 120:296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M et al (2018) Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am 29:115–127.e35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tetreault LA, Karadimas S, Wilson JR et al (2017) The natural history of degenerative cervical myelopathy and the rate of hospitalization following spinal cord injury: an updated systematic review. Glob Spine J 7:28S–34S. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217700396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Montano N, Ricciardi L, Olivi A (2019) Comparison of anterior cervical decompression and fusion versus laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes. World Neurosurg 130:530–536.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nikolaidis I, Fouyas IP, Sandercock PA, Statham PF (2010) Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001466.pub3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Scerrati A, Visani J, Norri N et al (2019) Effect of external cervical orthoses on clinical and radiological outcome of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04046-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbott A, Halvorsen M, Dedering A (2013) Is there a need for cervical collar usage post anterior cervical decompression and fusion using interbody cages? A randomized controlled pilot trial. Physiother Theory Pract 29:290–300. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2012.731627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Overley SC, Merrill RK, Baird EO et al (2018) Is cervical bracing necessary after one- and two-level instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A prospective randomized study. Glob Spine J 8:40–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217697318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karikari I, Ghogawala Z, Ropper AE et al (2018) Utility of cervical collars following cervical fusion surgery. Does it improve fusion rates or outcomes? A systematic review. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ricciardi L, Stifano V, D’Arrigo S et al (2019) The role of non-rigid cervical collar in pain relief and functional restoration after whiplash injury: a systematic review and a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06035-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lauretti WJ (2012) Chapter 10—the safety and effectiveness of common treatments for whiplash. In: Gatterman MI (ed) Whiplash. Mosby, Saint Louis, pp 169–178

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Ricciardi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 262 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ricciardi, L., Scerrati, A., Olivi, A. et al. The role of cervical collar in functional restoration and fusion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plating on single or double levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 29, 955–960 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06270-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06270-0

Keywords

Navigation