Elsevier

Carbon

Volume 160, 30 April 2020, Pages 164-175
Carbon

Exploiting the adsorption of simple gases O2 and H2 with minimal quadrupole moments for the dual gas characterization of nanoporous carbons using 2D-NLDFT models

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.013Get rights and content

Abstract

For years, the characterization of carbon pore size distribution (PSD) has been dominated by the analysis of N2 isotherms. Recently, the IUPAC Technical Report (2015) recommended Ar as inert gas for this analysis. N2 molecule due to its significant quadrupole moment may selectively interact with the polar surface sites and affect the isotherm measurement. CO2, another gas that is often used for the characterization of microporous carbons exhibits even higher quadrupole moment than N2. In the present study, we substitute N2 and CO2 with O2 and H2 gases that have much lower quadrupole moments. The PSD calculations are performed using molecular models based on classical and quantum corrected two-dimensional nonlocal density functional theory (2D-NLDFT).

We compare the results of the dual gas analysis methods by the simultaneous fit of our models to N2 & CO2, and O2 & H2 isotherms for several reference carbon samples and demonstrate consistency between the results derived from both pairs of isotherms.

A fundamental and practical benefit of using the dual gas analysis method is the ability to obtain the full micro and mesopore PSD by using a partial O2 isotherm without low-pressure data in combination with full H2 isotherm both measured at 77 K.

Introduction

For years, the characterization of carbon pore size distribution (PSD) has been dominated by the analysis of nitrogen (N2) isotherms measured at its boiling point (77 K). From the scientific viewpoint, however, N2 may not be the most appropriate molecular probe for the PSD evaluation. Its high quadrupole moment may affect the adsorption of N2 molecules due to the interactions with polar surface sites.

The molecular models used in this work for the evaluation of carbon pore structure assume nonspecific interactions of gas molecules with carbon surface. Real carbon materials may contain various mineral contaminations and chemical surface sites that may interact with adsorbate molecules via specific interactions. If the experimental adsorption isotherms are distorted by such interactions it may affect the PSDs calculated from these isotherms.

To minimize such effects IUPAC Technical Report 2015 [1] recommended argon (Ar) as the most reliable for the PSD evaluation. However, Ar adsorption measurements using liquid Ar as a coolant are more costly than the standard N2 analysis; therefore, from the practical viewpoint, Ar analysis is not a preferred one in a typical laboratory. As a replacement for argon, it was recently proposed to use oxygen (O2) [2]. Oxygen was chosen because its quadrupole moment has about three times lower value than N2. Moreover, it was shown for several representative carbon samples that their PSDs derived from adsorption measurements of N2 and O2 at 77 K and Ar at 87 K are in quantitative agreement.

On the other hand, the Report [1] recommended using CO2 for the characterization of ultramicroporous carbons because, at the recommended temperature (273 K), CO2 diffuses faster into micropores than N2 at the cryogenic temperature. This recommendation, however, is inconsistent with the premise of using molecules with low sensitivity to interactions with polar sites, because the CO2 quadrupole moment is even larger than that of N2, which makes it sensitive to the carbon surface chemistry [3]. In the absence of polar sites, the use of CO2 may be appropriate, and several authors applied CO2 adsorption to study the porosity of microporous carbons and carbon molecular sieves [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]].

Another simple gas that diffuses faster into ultramicropores than N2 at 77 K is H2, which is supercritical at this temperature. Furthermore, the H2 molecule has a small quadrupole moment and smaller diameter than CO2, and it has been that H2 adsorption data may provide meaningful PSD results in an extended range of pore sizes when analyzed alone [10] or simultaneously with argon data [11]. The grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) model isotherms of H2 and CO2 were also used [12] to analyze simultaneously adsorption data of H2 and CO2

The values of the absolute quadrupole moments of the considered molecules are in the following order [13]: Ar < O2 <H2 <N2 <CO2 and their ratios to the value of N2 are as follows 0.0 < 0.28< 0.46 < 1.0 <3.1. Other gases such as CH4 [14], CF4 and SF6 [15] with symmetrical molecules, zero quadruple moments and different molecular diameters have been used for the carbon pore size analysis as well as for the evaluation of pore connectivity and molecular sieving effects.

In present work, we use molecular models based on the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) to analyze O2 and H2 adsorption data simultaneously. We show comparisons of PSD results derived from O2 and H2 data and with those from N2 and CO2 data. The approach introduced in this work is advantageous compared to the earlier presented “dual analysis method” [16] based on N2 and CO2 data, due to the lower quadrupole moments of O2 and H2. It is also more practically convenient because of the same cryogen, liquid N2, used for both analyses. The PSD analysis is executed using adsorption models incorporating surface roughness, and energetic heterogeneity derived based on the NLDFT [[17], [18], [19], [20]] in its two-dimensional version 2D-NLDFT-HS [21,22] herein referred to as 2D-HS where HS stands for the heterogeneous surface.

Section snippets

Experimental

In this work, we have used two series of carbon samples derived from two precursors: (i) polyethylene terephthalate, (PET), and (ii) corn stigmata (CS). Both precursors were first carbonized to obtain chars, and then the chars were activated with CO2. The char derived from PET was labeled PC and the activated carbons derived from this char were labeled PCn, where n is the burn-off percent during the activation process. The char derived from corn stigmata was labeled C-CS, and its two activated

The two-dimensional NLDFT model of H2 adsorption on heterogeneous carbon surface at 77 K

At 77 K, hydrogen is far above its critical point of 33 K and thus its adsorption isotherms on the uniform carbon surface do not show the layering transitions that lead to artifacts [21,26] in the PSD calculations when the one-dimensional NLDFT model was applied. Nevertheless, for the evaluation of H2 adsorption model, we use the same surface roughness parameters and type of energetic heterogeneity as in the earlier developed models for the other simple gases [2]. We calculate the kernel

Conclusions

This study is an extension of previous studies [16,24] on the dual gas analysis method using N2 and CO2 isotherms, which we propose to replace with the analysis of O2 & H2 isotherms. In the first part of this work we develop the quantum corrected 2D–HS–FH model for H2 adsorption on the heterogeneous carbon surface at 77 K. This model is then used in conjunction with the earlier developed O2 model for the carbon PSD analysis at 77 K.

The underlying reason of using the isotherms of fast diffusing

Author contributions

Author 1: Jacek Jagiello: Conceived and designed the analysis, Collected the data, Contributed data or analysis tools, Performed the analysis, Wrote the paper.

Author 2: Jeffrey Kenvin, Conceived and designed the analysis, Contributed data or analysis tools, Contributed to writing the paper.

Author 3: Conchi O. Ania: Collected the data, Performed the analysis, Synthetized the carbon samples.

Author 4: Jose B. Parra; Collected the data, Performed the analysis, Synthetized the carbon samples.

Author

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (47)

  • J. Jagiello et al.

    Enhanced resolution of ultra micropore size determination of biochars and activated carbons by dual gas analysis using N2 and CO2 with 2D-NLDFT adsorption models

    Carbon

    (2019)
  • E.A. Ustinov et al.

    Pore size distribution analysis of activated carbons: application of density functional theory using nongraphitized carbon black as a reference system

    Carbon

    (2006)
  • A.V. Neimark et al.

    Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons

    Carbon

    (2009)
  • W.A. Steele

    The physical interaction of gases with crystalline solids: I. Gas-solid energies and properties of isolated adsorbed atoms

    Surf. Sci.

    (1973)
  • B. Kuchta et al.

    Numerical estimation of hydrogen storage limits in carbon-based nanospaces

    Carbon

    (2010)
  • J. Jagiello et al.

    Using DFT analysis of adsorption data of multiple gases including H2 for the comprehensive characterization of microporous carbons

    Carbon

    (2007)
  • M. Konstantakou et al.

    Characterization of nanoporous carbons by combining CO2 and H2 sorption data with the Monte Carlo simulations

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • J.T. Duda et al.

    Complementary study of microporous adsorbents with DFT and LBET

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2007)
  • P. Kleszyk et al.

    Carbons with narrow pore size distribution prepared by simultaneous carbonization and self-activation of tobacco stems and their application to supercapacitors

    Carbon

    (2015)
  • G. Gregis et al.

    Detection of lung cancer bio-markers in human breath using a micro-fabricated air analyzer

    Mater. Today: Proc.

    (2015)
  • G. Gregis et al.

    Characterization of materials toward toluene traces detection for air quality monitoring and lung cancer diagnosis

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2017)
  • D. Grau-Marin et al.

    Evaluation of the textural properties of ultramicroporous carbons using experimental and theoretical methods

    Carbon

    (2020)
  • M. Thommes et al.

    Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Pure Appl. Chem.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text