Abstract
Environmental Management Systems (EMS) based on international standard ISO 14001 are recognized as a tool to improve the environment and the sustainability of organizations. Green Chemistry (GC) seeks to reduce the use and generation of hazardous substances in chemical processes. This paper studies the relationship between EMS based on ISO 14001 and GC. We have analysed their similarities, difficulties, advantages, and synergies that can be developed with a joint implementation in general and in particular on university campuses. The results show that both disciplines have in common the philosophy of Continuous Improvement in the Processes (CIP) and that their joint application is possible, since each principle of GC are related to, at least, one clause of ISO 14001. It is shown that this joint application to different university areas can generate benefits, such as the reduction of hazardous waste and the promotion of green purchases, which favour the environmental improvement of universities. However, there are problems in their joint application related to the lack of specific knowledge and the difficulty of identifying products manufactured following the criteria of GC. Furthermore, a case study in the San Jorge University showing that both disciplines can be treated together is shown. Results were the following: seven GC initiatives (proposed by a small group of GC students) were submitted to the EMS office; only one was considered nonviable and two were implemented, achieving two main goals: Reduction of the environmental impact of laboratories and promotion of green purchasing in the laboratories of San Jorge University.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amaral LP, Martins N, Gouveia JB (2015) Quest for a sustainable university: a review. Int J Sustain High Educ 16(2):155–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-02-2013-0017
Aurandt JL, Butler EC (2011) Sustainability education: approaches for incorporating sustainability into the undergraduate curriculum. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract 137(2):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000049
Bai C, Sarkis J (2010) Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J Clean Prod 18(12):1200–1210
Bero BN, Doerry E, Middleton R, Meinhardt C (2012) Challenges in the development of environmental management systems on the modern university campus. Int J Sustain High Educ 13(2):133–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371211211827
Bodlalo LH, Sabbaghan M, Jome SMRE (2013) A comparative study in Green Chemistry education curriculum in America and China. In: Ismail IS, AbdRahman SB, Noordin NM, Mustafa SMS (eds) 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching, vol. 90, pp 288–292
Cebrian G, Grace M, Humphris D (2015) Academic staff engagement in education for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 106:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.010
Clarke A, Kouri R (2009) Choosing an appropriate university or college environmental management system. J Clean Prod 17(11):971–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.019
Collins TJ (2017) Review of the twenty-three year evolution of the first university course in green chemistry: teaching future leaders how to create sustainable societies. J Clean Prod 140:93–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.136
Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ 31(3):15–22
Da Fonseca LMCM (2015) ISO 14001: 2015: an improved tool for sustainability. J Ind Eng Manag 8(1):37–50
de Vega CA, Benitez SO, Ramirez Barreto ME (2008) Solid waste characterization and recycling potential for a university campus. Waste Manag 28:S21–S26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.022
DeVierno Kreuder A, House-Knight T, Whitford J, Ponnusamy E, Miller P, Jesse N, Aped I (2017) A method for assessing greener alternatives between chemical products following the 12 principles of green. Chem ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(4):2927–2935
Fisher RM (2003) Applying ISO 14001 as a business tool for campus sustainability: a case study from New Zealand. Int J Sustainability High Educ 4(2):138–150
Houri A, Wehbe H (2003) Towards an environmentally friendly chemistry laboratory: managing expired chemicals. Green Chem 5(3):G49–G50. https://doi.org/10.1039/b305234f
Iles A (2008) Shifting to green chemistry: the need for innovations in sustainability marketing. Bus Strategy Environ 17(8):524–535
ISO (2015) ISO 14001:2015 Environmental Management Systems—requirements with guidance for use: ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Jones N, Panoriou E, Thiveou K, Roumeliotis S, Allan S, Clark J, Evangelinos K (2012) Investigating benefits from the implementation of Environmental Management Systems in a Greek university. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14(4):669–676
Koester RJ, Eflin J, Vann J (2006) Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approach. J Clean Prod 14(9–11):769–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.055
Li Q (2016) Environmentally benign chemistry and chemical laboratory construction in Colleges and Universities. In: Shi S, Wu M (eds) Proceedings of the 2016 3rd International Conference on Management, Education Technology and Sports Science, vol. 25, pp 446–450.
Lo-Iacono-Ferreira VG, Ignacio Torregrosa-Lopez J, Capuz-Rizo SF (2016) Use of Life Cycle Assessment methodology in the analysis of Ecological Footprint Assessment results to evaluate the environmental performance of universities. J Clean Prod 133:43–53
Manchanayakage R (2013) Designing and incorporating green chemistry courses at a liberal arts college to increase students’ awareness and interdisciplinary collaborative work. J Chem Educ 90(9):1167–1171. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300468r
Mansilla DS, Celeste Muscia G, Ugliarolo EA (2014) Foundations for considering green chemistry in organic chemistry curriculum Una fundamentación para la incorporación de la química verde en los currículos de química orgánica. [foundations for considering green chemistry in organic chemistry curriculum]. Educación química 25(1):56–59
Matus KJ, Clark WC, Anastas PT, Zimmerman JB (2012) Barriers to the implementation of green chemistry in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):10892–10899
Nicolaides A (2006) The implementation of environmental management towards sustainable universities and education for sustainable development as an ethical imperative. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(4):414–424
Oliveira JAd, Oliveira OJd, Ometto AR, Capparelli HF (2016) Guidelines for the integration of EMS based in ISO 14001 with Cleaner Production. Production 26(2):273–284. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.160214
Omrcen E, Lundgren U, Dalbro M (2013) Can an environmental management system be a driving force for sustainability in higher education? A case from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. In: Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities, pp 88–106, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK
Ozturk E, Ozbek B, Senel I (2017) Production of biologically safe and mechanically improved reduced graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite composites. Materials Research Express, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa5464
Pentecost TC, Soman S (2014) Chemistry education and green chemistry on the third coast. J Chem Educ 91(5):615–616. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5002762
Reinert KH (2001) Integrating green chemistry and sustainability into a specialty chemical company. Pure Appl Chem 73(8):1269–1272. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200173081269
Robinson O, Kemp S, Williams I (2015) Carbon management at universities: a reality check. J Clean Prod 106:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.095
Sarkis J, Zhu Q, Lai K-h (2011) An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int J Prod Econ 130(1):1–15
Spellerberg IF, Buchan GD, Englefield R (2004) Need a university adopt a formal environmental management system? Progress without an EMS at a small university. Int J Sustain High Educ 5(2):125–132
Stolte S, Abdulkarim S, Arning J, Blomeyer-Nienstedt A-K, Bottin-Weber U, Matzke M, Thoeming J (2008) Primary biodegradation of ionic liquid cations, identification of degradation products of 1-methyl-3-octylimidazolium chloride and electrochemical wastewater treatment of poorly biodegradable compounds. Green Chem 10(2):214–224. https://doi.org/10.1039/b713095c
Sun D, Song GB, Zhang SS (2014) Green chemistry: theory and practice study on ecological footprint of campus paper consumption. Mechatron Eng Comput Inf Technol 556-562:6587–6590. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.556-562.6587
Urbanski M, Leal W (2015) Measuring sustainability at universities by means of the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Rating System (STARS): early findings from STARS data. Environ Dev Sustain 17(2):209–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9564-3
Woolliams J, Lloyd M, Spengler JD (2005) The case for sustainable laboratories: first steps at Harvard University. Int J Sustain High Educ 6(4):363–382
Zsidisin GA, Siferd SP (2001) Environmental purchasing: a framework for theory development. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 7(1):61–73
Zuin VG, de Almeida Pacca JL (2013) Formation of teachers in chemistry and curricular environmentalization: a case study in a tertiary education institution in brazil. Ensen De Las Cienc 31(1):79–93
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Spanish MINECO (projects CTQ2013-44867-P), the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), and the Government of Aragon, Consolidated Group E105 is gratefully acknowledged. GreenLife acknowledges financial support from EEE53 SL: Pinares de Venecia División Energética and Brial (ENATICA). Both business groups are committed to sustainable development through environmental respect.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loste, N., Roldán, E., Lomba, L. et al. Green Chemistry and Environmental Management Systems: Relationships, Synergies, Advantages and Barriers of Joint Implementation at Universities. Environmental Management 64, 783–793 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01218-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01218-y