Abstract
Water is essential to human life around the world, but there are numerous threats to its quality both internationally and nationally. The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to examine public perceptions of water-related environmental concerns in northwest Ohio. In fall 2015, nine focus groups on environmental health conditions were conducted with Lucas County, Ohio residents. Each 90-min focus group was videotaped and professionally transcribed to maximize data capture and facilitate data analysis. Colaizzi’s (1978) method of content analysis was applied to make sense of the participants’ environmental concerns related to water. The majority of the 93 participants were white females between the ages of 40 and 59. A do-not-drink advisory related to a harmful algal bloom in the summer of 2014 and the possibility of a future bloom were still prominent in residents’ minds that affected their perceptions and behaviors 1 year later. The emergent themes included: (1) avoiding the use of tap water due to concerns about water quality, (2) mourning the loss of a precious resource and their childhood recreational activities, (3) believing there are financial impacts associated with water problems, (4) distrusting the actions and decisions of persons in authority, (5) wanting to stop fighting about who is to blame and determine the problem’s real cause, and (6) desiring actions and planning by authorities to prevent future problems. Understanding public perceptions of water-related environmental concerns can inform practitioners worldwide on successful approaches to restoring trust, educating about and communicating risk, and planning for future issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett MJ, Jackson-Smith D, Haeffner M (2018) Influence of recreational activity on water quality perceptions and concerns in Utah: a replicated analysis. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 22:26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2017.12.003
Beardmore B (2015) Boater perceptions of environmental issues affecting lakes in Northern Wisconsin. JAWRA 51(2):537–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12265
Bingham M, Sinha MK, Lupi F (2015) Economic benefits of reducing harmful algal blooms in Lake Erie. Environmental Consulting & Technology Inc., Report 66. Gainsville FL
Breffle WS, Muralidharan D, Donovan RP, Liu F, Mukherjee A, Jin Y (2013) Socioeconomic evaluation of the impact of natural resource stressors on human-use services in the Great Lakes environment: a Lake Michigan case study. Resour Policy 38(2):152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.10.004
Chorus I., Bartram J. (eds) (1999) Toxic cyanobacteria in water: a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management. World Health Organization, E&FN Spon, Routledge, London. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/toxicyanobact/en/
Colaizzi P (1978) Psychological research as phenomenologists view it. In: Valle R, King M (eds) Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford University Press, New York
Drobac D, Tokodi N, Simeunović J, Baltić V, Stanić D, Svirčev Z (2013) Human exposure to cyanotoxins and their effects on health. Arh za Hig rada i toksikologiju 64:305–315. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2320
Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, Zabala F (1998) Public reliance on risk communication channels in the wake of a cryptosporidium outbreak. Risk Anal 18:367–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00350.x
Hu Z, Morton LW, Mahler R (2011) Bottled water: United States consumers and their perceptions of water quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 8(2):565–578. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8020565
Jones AQ, Dewey CE, Dore K, Majowicz SE, McEwen SA, Waltner-Toews D, Henson SJ, Mathews EM (2005) Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: focus group analyses. BMC Public Health 5:129. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-129
Jones AQ, Dewey CE, Doré K, Majowicz SE, McEwen SA, Waltner-Toews D, Eric M, Carr DJ, Henson SJ (2006) Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies. BMC Public Health 6:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-94
Jones AQ, Dewey CE, Doré K, Majowicz SE, McEwen SA, Waltner-Toews D, Henson SJ, Mathews E (2007) A qualitative exploration of the public perception of municipal drinking water. Water Policy 9:425–438. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2007.019
Kuhar SE, Nierenberg K, Kirkpatrick B, Tobin GA (2009) Public perceptions of Florida red tide risks. Risk Anal 29(7):963–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01228.x
Maxwell JA (2013) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks CA
McCarty CL, Nelson L, Eitniear S, Zgodzinski E, Zabala A, Billing L, DiOrio M (2016) Community needs assessment after microcystin toxin contamination of a municipal water supply—Lucas County, Ohio, September 2014 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65: 925–929. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6535a1
McSpirit S, Reid C (2011) Residents’ perceptions of tap water and decisions to purchase bottled water: a survey analysis from the appalachian, big sandy coal mining region of West Virginia. Soc Nat Resour 24:511–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903401432
Nierenberg K, Byrne MM, Fleming LE, Stephan W, Reich A, Backer LC, Tanga E, Dalpra DR, Kirkpatrick B (2010) Florida red tide perception: residents versus tourists. Harmful algae 9(6):600–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2010.04.010
Parag Y, Roberts JT (2009) A battle against the bottles: building, claiming, and regaining tap-water trustworthiness. Soc Nat Resour 22:625–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802017248
Savoia E, Stoto MA, Gupta R, Wright N, Viswanath K (2015) Public response to the 2014 chemical spill in West Virginia: knowledge, opinions and behaviours. BMC Public Health 15:790. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2134-2
Saylor A, Prokopy LS, Amberg S (2011) What’s wrong with the tap? Examining perceptions of tap water and bottled water at Purdue University. Environ Manag 48:588–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9692-6
Schade CP, Wright N, Gupta R, Latif DA, Jha A, Robinson J (2015) Self-reported household impacts of large-scale chemical contamination of the public water supply, Charleston, West Virginia, USA. PloS ONE 10(5):e0126744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126744
Stewart I, Webb PM, Schluter PJ, Shaw GR (2006) Recreational and occupational field exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria - a review of anecdotal and case reports, epidemiologic studies, and the challenges for epidemiologic assessment. Environ Health 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-5-6
Stumpf RP, Johnson LT, Wynne TT, Baker DB (2016) Forecasting annual cyanobacterial bloom biomass to inform management decisions in Lake Erie. J Gt Lakes Res 42:1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2016.08.006
University of Toledo (2019) UT water task force. https://www.utoledo.edu/commissions/water-task-force/. Accessed 13 Sep 2019
University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute (2018) Lake Ontario. https://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/resources/the-formation-of-the-great-lakes/lake-ontario/. Accessed 20 Sep 2019
Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T (2013) Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci 15(3):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Wilder Research/APM Research Lab (2018) Qualitative study for the water main: how American’s relate to water. Wilder Research/American Public Media (APM) Research Lab, St Paul MN
Zhang W., Sohngen BL (2017) Heterogeneous preferences for water quality attributes: a discrete choice experiment of lake Erie Recreational Anglers. Working Papers 590, CARD. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/card_workingpapers/590
Acknowledgements
Focus groups were conducted as part of an environmental health assessment with the Toledo-Lucas County Health Department; Sheryl Milt, PhD, CIH, Principal Investigator.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ames, A., Steiner, V., Liebold, E. et al. Perceptions of Water-related Environmental Concerns in Northwest Ohio One Year after a Lake Erie Harmful Algal Bloom. Environmental Management 64, 689–700 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01217-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01217-z