Abstract
Temporal aspects of ecosystem services have gained surprisingly little attention given that ecosystem service flows are not static but change over time. We present the first systematic review to describe and establish how studies have assessed temporal patterns in supply and demand of ecosystem services. 295 studies, 2% of all studies engaging with the ecosystem service concept, considered changes in ecosystem services over time. Changes were mainly characterised as monotonic and linear (81%), rather than non-linear or through system shocks. Further, a lack of focus of changing ecosystem service demand (rather than supply) hampers our understanding of the temporal patterns of ecosystem services provision and use. Future studies on changes in ecosystem services over time should (1) more explicitly study temporal patterns, (2) analyse trade-offs and synergies between services over time, and (3) integrate changes in supply and demand and involve and empower stakeholders in temporal ecosystem services research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abson, D.J., and M. Termansen. 2011. Valuing ecosystem services in terms of ecological risks and returns. Conservation Biology 25: 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01623.x.
Bastian, O., K. Grunewald, and R.-U. Syrbe. 2012. Space and time aspects of ecosystem services, using the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 8: 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.631941.
Baveye, P.C., J. Baveye, and J. Gowdy. 2016. Soil “Ecosystem” services and natural capital: Critical appraisal of research on uncertain ground. Frontiers in Environmental Science 4: 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00041.
Bennett, E.M., G.D. Peterson, and L.J. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
Bhattacharyya, P.N., M.P. Goswami, and L.H. Bhattacharyya. 2016. Perspective of beneficial microbes in agriculture under changing climatic scenario: A review. Journal of Phytology 8: 26. https://doi.org/10.19071/jp.2016.v8.3022.
Birkhofer, K., E. Diehl, J. Andersson, J. Ekroos, A. Früh-Müller, F. Machnikowski, V.L. Mader, L. Nilsson, et al. 2015. Ecosystem services—Current challenges and opportunities for ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 2: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2014.00087.
Blaauw, B.R., and R. Isaacs. 2014. Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination-dependent crop. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 890–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12257.
Bullock, J.M., J. Aronson, A.C. Newton, R.F. Pywell, and J.M. Rey-Benayas. 2011. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 26: 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011.
Burkhard, B., F. Kroll, S. Nedkov, and F. Müller. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21: 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
Caniglia, G., N. Schäpke, D.J. Lang, D.J. Abson, C. Luederitz, A. Wiek, M.D. Laubichler, F. Gralla, et al. 2017. Experiments and evidence in sustainability science: A typology. Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.164.
Chan, K.M.A., A.D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, S. Klain, T. Satterfield, X. Basurto, A. Bostrom, R. Chuenpagdee, et al. 2012. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62: 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7.
Chapin III, F.S., S.R. Carpenter, G.P. Kofinas, C. Folke, N. Abel, W.C. Clark, P. Olsson, D.M.S. Smith, et al. 2010. Ecosystem stewardship: Sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008.
Chaudhary, S., A. McGregor, D. Houston, and N. Chettri. 2015. The evolution of ecosystem services: A time series and discourse-centered analysis. Environmental Science & Policy 54: 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.025.
Cook, D.C., M.B. Thomas, S.A. Cunningham, D.L. Anderson, and P.J. De Barro. 2007. Predicting the economic impact of an invasive species on an ecosystem service. Ecological Applications 17: 1832–1840. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-1632.1.
Cord, A.F., B. Bartkowski, M. Beckmann, A. Dittrich, K. Hermans-Neumann, A. Kaim, N. Lienhoop, K. Locher-Krause, et al. 2017. Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: Main concepts, methods and the road ahead. Ecosystem Services 28: 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.012.
Daw, T.I.M., K. Brown, S. Rosendo, and R. Pomeroy. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: The need to disaggregate human well-being. Environmental Conservation 38: 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892911000506.
de Groot, R.S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7: 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.
Dupras, J., and M. Alam. 2015. Urban sprawl and ecosystem services: A half century perspective in the Montreal area (Quebec, Canada). Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy 17: 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.927755.
Egoh, B., M. Rouget, B. Reyers, A.T. Knight, R.M. Cowling, A.S. van Jaarsveld, and A. Welz. 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: A review. Ecological Economics 63: 714–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.007.
Fischer, M., O. Bossdorf, S. Gockel, F. Hänsel, A. Hemp, D. Hessenmöller, G. Korte, J. Nieschulze, et al. 2010. Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: The biodiversity exploratories. Basic and Applied Ecology 11: 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009.
Fisher, B., R.K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68: 643–653.
Fraser, E.D. 2003. Social vulnerability and ecological fragility: Building bridges between social and natural sciences using the Irish Potato Famine as a case study. Conservation Ecology 7: 9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00534-070209.
Guerra, C.A., M.J. Metzger, J. Maes, and T. Pinto-Correia. 2016. Policy impacts on regulating ecosystem services: Looking at the implications of 60 years of landscape change on soil erosion prevention in a Mediterranean silvo-pastoral system. Landscape Ecology 31: 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0241-1.
Haase, D., N. Schwarz, M. Strohbach, F. Kroll, and R. Seppelt. 2012. Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: An integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society 17: 22. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04853-170322.
Haines-Young, R., and M. Potschin. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In Ecosystem ecology: A new synthesis, ed. D.G. Raffaelli and C.L.J. Frid, 110–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, C.C., N.A.J. Graham, and J.E. Cinner. 2013. Synergies and tradeoffs in how managers, scientists, and fishers value coral reef ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 23: 1444–1453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.028.
Horan, R.D., E.P. Fenichel, K.L. Drury, and D.M. Lodge. 2011. Managing ecological thresholds in coupled environmental–human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 7333–7338. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005431108.
Howe, C., H. Suich, B. Vira, and G.M. Mace. 2014. Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world. Global Environmental Change 28: 263–275.
Huxham, M., L. Emerton, J. Kairo, F. Munyi, H. Abdirizak, T. Muriuki, F. Nunan, and R.A. Briers. 2015. Applying climate compatible development and economic valuation to coastal management: A case study of Kenya’s mangrove forests. Journal of Environmental Management 157: 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.018.
IPBES. 2018. Summary for policymakers of the regional assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services for Europe and Central Asia of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES.
IPBES. 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. In ed. S. Díaz, J. Settele, E.S. Brondizio, H.T. Ngo, M. Guèze, J. Agard, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, et al. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.
Jha, S., C.M. Bacon, S.M. Philpott, R.A. Rice, V.E. Méndez, and P. Läderach. 2011. A review of ecosystem services, farmer livelihoods, and value chains in shade coffee agroecosystems. In Integrating agriculture, conservation and ecotourism: Examples from the field, issues in agroecology—Present status and future prospects, vol. 1, ed. W.B. Campbell and S. López Ortíz, 141–208. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1309-3.
Jim, C.Y., and W.Y. Chen. 2006. Recreation–amenity use and contingent valuation of urban greenspaces in Guangzhou, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 75: 81–96.
Kaufman, L., and P.J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics New York: Wiley.
Kremen, C. 2005. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters 8: 468–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00751.x.
Krütli, P., M. Stauffacher, T. Flüeler, and R.W. Scholz. 2010. Functional-dynamic public participation in technological decision-making: Site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Risk Research 13: 861–875.
Lautenbach, S., A. Mupepele, C.F. Dormann, H. Lee, S. Schmidt, S.S.K. Scholte, R. Seppelt, A.J.A. Van Teeffelen, et al. 2019. Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Regional Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9.
Legendre, P., and L.F. Legendre. 2012. Numerical ecology, vol. 24. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Loreau, M., S. Naeem, and P. Inchausti (eds.). 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Synthesis and perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Luederitz, C., E. Brink, F. Gralla, V. Hermelingmeier, M. Meyer, L. Niven, L. Panzer, S. Partelow, et al. 2015. A review of urban ecosystem services: Six key challenges for future research. Ecosystem Services 14: 98–112.
Luederitz, C., M. Meyer, D.J. Abson, F. Gralla, D.J. Lang, A.-L. Rau, and H. von Wehrden. 2016. Systematic student-driven literature reviews in sustainability science—An effective way to merge research and teaching. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.005.
Maes, J., B. Egoh, L. Willemen, C. Liquete, P. Vihervaara, J.P. Schägner, B. Grizzetti, E.G. Drakou, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services 1: 31–39.
Martín-López, B., E. Gómez-Baggethun, P.L. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2009. Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.03.013.
Martínez-Harms, M.J., and P. Balvanera. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: A review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 8: 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1439.003.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.
Nijkamp, P., G. Vindigni, and P.A.L.D. Nunes. 2008. Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study. Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003.
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Rau, A.-L., H. von Wehrden, and D.J. Abson. 2018a. Temporal patterns of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 151: 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.009.
Rau, A.-L., M.W. Bickel, S. Hilser, S. Jenkins, G. McCrory, N. Pfefferle, J. Rathgens, D. Roitsch, et al. 2018b. Linking concepts of change and ecosystem services research: A systematic review. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 4: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/cass-2018-0004.
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G.D. Peterson, and E.M. Bennett. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 5242–5247. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
Reed, M.S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation 141: 2417–2431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014.
Renard, D., J.M. Rhemtulla, and E.M. Bennett. 2015. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 13411–13416. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502565112.
Roberts, D.W. 2016. labdsv: Ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.8-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labdsv.
Rockström, J., and M. Falkenmark. 2000. Semiarid crop production from a hydrological perspective: Gap between potential and actual yields. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 19: 319–346.
Rodríguez, J.P., T.D. Beard, E.M. Bennett, G.S. Cumming, S.J. Cork, J. Agard, A.P. Dobson, and G.D. Peterson. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11: 28.
Scholes, R.J., and R. Biggs. 2005. A biodiversity intactness index. Nature 434: 45–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03289.
Schroter, D. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310: 1333–1337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1115233.
Seppelt, R., C.F. Dormann, F.V. Eppink, S. Lautenbach, and S. Schmidt. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: Approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 630–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
Smith, P. 2004. Soils as carbon sinks: The global context. Soil Use and Management 20: 212–218.
Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S.E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E.M. Bennett, R. Biggs, S.R. Carpenter, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347: 737. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
Thornton, P.K., P.J. Ericksen, M. Herrero, and A.J. Challinor. 2014. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: A review. Global Change Biology 20: 3313–3328. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12581.
von Wehrden, H., J. Hanspach, P. Kaczensky, J. Fischer, and K. Wesche. 2012. Global assessment of the non-equilibrium concept in rangelands. Ecological Applications 22: 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0802.1.
Wilkinson, C., T. Saarne, G.D. Peterson, and J. Colding. 2013. Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept-an historical exploration. Ecology and Society 18: 37. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05368-180137.
Winfree, R., B.J. Gross, and C. Kremen. 2011. Valuing pollination services to agriculture. Ecological Economics 71: 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.08.001.
Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N.J. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B.C. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, et al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132294.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and by the strategic research environment BECC, hosted by CEC at Lund University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rau, AL., Burkhardt, V., Dorninger, C. et al. Temporal patterns in ecosystem services research: A review and three recommendations. Ambio 49, 1377–1393 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01292-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01292-w