Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Noncompliance with palliative systemic therapy in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer: a blind spot for oncologists?

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of our study was to provide a general overview of noncompliance with palliative systemic therapy in distant metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

We analyzed an unselected cohort of 339 patients who were diagnosed with MBC over a 22-year period (1990–2011, age restriction: ≥ 85 years old).

Results

Forty patients (11.8%) rejected the offered or recommended systemic therapy (age distribution of this noncompliance subgroup: ≤60 years at MBC diagnosis: 7.9%; 60–70 years: 13.2%; > 70 years: 15.6%). The rate of noncompliance was equally distributed over time (1990–1999: 12.2% vs. 2000–2011: 11.5%, p = 0.87). Compared to patients who had received palliative antineoplastic systemic therapy, those who remained untreated were significantly older (70 vs. 61 years, p = 0.015), had shorter metastatic disease survival (2 vs. 27 months, p < 0.001), had more often an aggressive tumor subtype (hormone-receptor negative carcinomas: 48.7% vs. 22.2%, p < 0.001), and had more often secondary MBC (95.0% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Although the high rate of noncompliance in the subgroup of elderly patients was not unexpected, it is noticeable that even in the subgroup of patients who were younger than 60 years, approximately 8% also rejected any systemic therapy before a MBC-related death occurred This group of younger women rarely had any relevant comorbidities, were potential candidates for chemotherapy and knowingly declined the therapy options. Such patients are never or seldom seen by oncologists in their daily practice and therefore play a minor role in their personal perception of disease. Nevertheless, these under-reported cases make up a significant proportion of MBC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardoso F, Senkus E, Costa A et al (2018) 4th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 4). Ann Oncol 29:1634–1657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chia SK, Speers CH, D’Yachkova Y et al (2007) The impact of new chemotherapeutic and hormone agents on survival in a population-based cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 110:973–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giordano SH, Buzdar AU, Smith TL et al (2004) Is breast cancer survival improving? Cancer 100:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenberg PA, Hortobagyi GN, Smith TL et al (1996) Long-term follow-up of patients with complete remission following combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2197–2205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauri D, Polyzos NP, Salanti G et al (2008) Multiple-treatments meta-analysis of chemotherapy and targeted therapies in advanced breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:1780–1791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sundquist M, Brudin L, Tejler G (2017) Improved survival in metastatic breast cancer 1985-2016. Breast 31:46–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Güth U, Huang DJ, Schotzau A, Schmid SM (2016) Use of palliative endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive distant metastatic breast cancer: how often, how effective, how long? Oncology 90:1–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Güth U, Huang DJ, Schoetzau A et al (2009) Systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer: the truth beyond the clinical trials. Oncology 76:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Berg AI, Hassing LB, Nilsson SE, Johansson B (2009) As long as I’m in good health”. The relationship between medical diagnoses and life satisfaction in the oldest-old. Aging Clin Exp Res 21:307–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Leslie WT (1994) Age and clinical decision making in oncology patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1766–1770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC et al (2000) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. JAMA 284:2476–2482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vetter M, Huang DJ, Bosshard G, Güth U (2013) Breast cancer in women 80 years of age and older: a comprehensive analysis of an underreported entity. Acta Oncol 52:57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hagger MS, Koch S, Chatzisarantis NLD, Orbell S (2017) The common sense model of self-regulation: meta-analysis and test of a process model. Psychol Bull 143:1117–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D (1980) The common sense model of illness danger. In: Rachman S (ed) Medical psychology. Pergamon, New York, pp 7–30

    Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph K, Vrouwe S, Kamruzzaman A et al (2012) Outcome analysis of breast cancer patients who declined evidence-based treatment. World J Surg Oncol 10:118

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhoef MJ, Balneaves LG, Boon HS, Vroegindewey A (2005) Reasons for and characteristics associated with complementary and alternative medicine use among adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Integr Cancer Ther 4:274–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Walter Bierbauer was partly funded by the University Research Priority Program “Dynamic of Healthy Aging” of the University of Zurich.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uwe Güth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

The study is in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study design and data collection methods were approved by the institutional review board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elfgen, C., Montagna, G., Schmid, S.M. et al. Noncompliance with palliative systemic therapy in patients with distant metastatic breast cancer: a blind spot for oncologists?. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176, 469–476 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05255-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05255-3

Keywords

Navigation