Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real world situation and clarify the problem in initial treatment for elderly patients with ovarian cancer in Japan.
Methods
We used the ovarian cancer database, containing all patients diagnosed and treated with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage I–IV ovarian cancer at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from June 2008 to April 2013. Patients were stratified into two groups based on age: an elderly group, aged 70 years or older, and a younger group, aged below 70 years. We retrospectively assessed the rate of receiving standard therapy, and the feasibility and safety of chemotherapy compared with younger patients.
Results
In total, 244 patients (elderly group, 36 patients; younger group, 208 patients) were analyzed. A significantly lower proportion of elderly patients than younger patients received standard therapy (15.7% vs. 32.5%, p = 0.026). Even for the elderly group, 95% patients underwent surgery in our institution. Conversely the rate of patients receiving nonstandard chemotherapy in the elderly group was significantly higher than in the younger group (30.5% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.01).
Conclusions
This study clarified the type of treatment being performed in the field, and the proportion of elderly ovarian cancer patients receiving standard therapy compared with younger patients in Japan. In addition, the actual situation of elderly patients in Japan might be different from that in Western countries. We need to evaluate the appropriate treatment for elderly patients in Japan.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Takahashi F et al (2009) Dose-dense paclitaxel once a week in combination with carboplatin every 3 weeks for advanced ovarian cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9698):(9698):1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61157-0
Burger RA, Brady MF, Bookman MA et al (26):2473–2483. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1104390
Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J et al (2011) A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 365(26):2484–2496. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1103799
Bun S, Yunokawa M, Ebata T et al (2016) Feasibility of dose-dense paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy in elderly patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacols 78(4):745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3100-0
Freyer G, Geay JF, Touzet S et al (2005) Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts tolerance to chemotherapy and survival in elderly patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma: a GINECO study. Ann Oncol 16(11):1795–1800. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi368
Tredan O, Geay JF, Touzet S et al (2007) Carboplatin/cyclophosphamide or carboplatin/paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer? Analysis of two consecutive trials from the Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens. Ann Oncol 18(2):256–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdl400
Falandry C, Weber B, Savoye AM et al (2013) Development of a geriatric vulnerability score in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with first-line carboplatin: a GINECO prospective trial. Ann Oncol 24(11):2808–2813. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt360
von Gruenigen VE, Huang HQ, Beumer JH et al (2017) Chemotherapy completion in elderly women with ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer—an NRG oncology/gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 144(3):459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.033
Fuh KC, Shin JY, Kapp DS et al (2015) Survival differences of Asian and Caucasian epithelial ovarian cancer patients in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 136(3):491–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.009
Pignata S, Breda E, Scambia G et al (2008) A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A multicentre Italian trial in ovarian cancer (MITO-5) study. Crit Rev Oncol/Hematol 66(3):229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.12.005
Pignata S, Scambia G, Katsaros D et al (2014) Carboplatin plus paclitaxel once a week versus every 3 weeks in patients with advanced ovarian cancer (MITO-7): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(4):396–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70049-X
Errico A (2014) Gynaecological cancer: MITO-7-a weekly regimen associated with a better quality of life for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 11(4):177. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.45
Japanese translation of common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), and instructions and guidelines (2004) Int J Clin Oncol 9(Suppl 3):1–82
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software 'EZR' for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3):452–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.244
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tsui J et al (2014) Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer. Cancer 120(8):1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28508
Fourcadier E, Tretarre B, Gras-Aygon C et al (2015) Under-treatment of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: a population based study. BMC cancer 15:937. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1947-9
Rauh-Hain JA, Melamed A, Wright A et al (2017) Overall survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs primary cytoreductive surgery in women with epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database. JAMA Oncol 3(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4411
Katsumata N, Yasuda M, Isonishi S et al (2013) Long-term results of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin versus conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin for treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer (JGOG 3016): a randomised, controlled, open-label trial. Lancet Oncol 14(10):1020–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70363-2
Bandera EV, Lee VS, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L et al (2015) Impact of chemotherapy dosing on ovarian cancer survival according to body mass index. JAMA Oncol 1(6):737–745. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1796
Griffin DA, Penprase B, Klamerus JF (2012) Relative dose intensity–improving treatment and outcomes in early-stage breast cancer: a retrospective study. Oncol Nurs Forum 39(6):E459–467. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.onf.e459-e467
Tanabe Y, Hashimoto K, Shimizu C et al (2013) Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 18(1):132–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0352-x
Pignata S, Scambia G, Ferrandina G et al (2011) Carboplatin plus paclitaxel versus carboplatin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer: the MITO-2 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29(27):3628–3635. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8566
Pujade-Lauraine E, Wagner U, Aavall-Lundqvist E et al (2010) Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer in late relapse. J Clin Oncol 28(20):3323–3329. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.7519
Acknowledgements
We thank Colleen Elso, PhD, from Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript. We would like to express our sincere thanks to all patients and investigators. The authors would like to thank Dr. Kan Yonemori, and Mr. Hiroyuki Terakado for supporting to make manuscript.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Bun, S., Yunokawa, M., Ebata, T. et al. Feasibility of initial treatment in elderly patients with ovarian cancer in Japan: a retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 24, 1111–1118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01449-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01449-3