Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prognostic value of routine second transurethral resection in patients with newly diagnosed stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from randomized 10-year extension trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of routine second TUR on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC)

Material and methods

A total of 210 patients (mean age 62.1 years, 89.5% were males) with stage pT1 NMIBC who underwent first TUR were prospectively randomized into two groups including second TUR (n = 105) and no second TUR (n = 105) groups. Data on recurrence, disease progression, 7-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded.

Results

The median follow-up time was 119 months (IQR 65-168). Per-protocol (PP) analysis revealed that compared to patients without second TUR, patients with second TUR had significantly higher 5-year, 7-year and 10-year rates for RFS (59.4%, 57.9% and 54.8% vs. 36.3%, 31.7% and 26.8%, respectively, p < 0.001) and PFS (93.3%, 91.9% and 90.4% vs. 74.0%, 71.4% and 68.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). According to PP and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, the 10-year OS rate was significantly higher in patients with second TUR (59.1 vs. 40.8%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that undergoing second TUR (OR 1.661, 95% CI 1.156–2.385, p = 0.006) was an independent determinant of prolonged OS.

Conclusions

In conclusion, these findings indicate the prognostic value of second TUR in stage pT1 NMIBC patients, not only for RFS and PFS advantages but also for the long-term OS advantage. Therefore, second TUR should be routinely performed in all stage pT1 NMIBC patients with life expectancy of at least 10 years, given the positive contribution to all oncological outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CIS:

Carcinoma in situ

ITP:

Intention-to-treat

MMC:

Mitomycin

NMIBC:

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

OS:

Overall survival

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PP:

Per protocol

RFS:

Recurrence-free survival

TUR:

Transurethral resection

References

  1. Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M et al (2017) EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol 71:447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cambier S, Sylvester RJ, Collette L et al (2016) EORTC nomograms and risk groups for predicting recurrence, progression, and disease-specific and overall survival in non-muscle-invasive stage Ta-T1 urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with 1–3 years of maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur Urol 69:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W et al (2006) Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49:465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soukup V, Duskova J, Pesl M et al (2014) The prognostic value of T1 bladder cancer substaging: a single institution retrospective study. Urol Int 92:150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Z, Xie L, Chen T et al (2016) Risk Factors predictive of recurrence and progression for patients who suffered initial recurrence after transurethral resection of stage pT1 bladder tumor in Chinese population: a retrospective study. Med (Baltim) 95:e2625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U et al (2010) Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 58:185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Divrik RT, Yildirim U, Zorlu F et al (2006) The effect of repeat transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with T1 tumors of the bladder who received intravesical mitomycin: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol 175:1641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI et al (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon

  10. Herr HW (2015) Role of repeat resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 13:1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Divrik T, Yildirim U, Eroglu A et al (2006) Is a second transurethral resection necessary for newly diagnosed pT1 bladder cancer? J Urol 175:1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rigaud J, Karam G, Braud G et al (2002) Value of second endoscopic resection in stage T1 bladder tumors. Prog Urol 12:27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zurkirchen MA, Sulser T, Gaspert A et al (2004) Second transurethral resection of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a must even for experienced urologist. Urol Int 72:99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogeli TA, Grimm M-O, Simon X et al (2002) Prospective study to assess repeat transurethral resection in superficial bladder cancer. Urologe A 41:470

  15. Schips L, Augustin H, Zigeuner RE et al (2002) Is repeated transurethral resection justified in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer? Urology 59:220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakse G, Algaba F, Malmstrom PU et al (2004) A second-look TUR in T1 transitional cell carcinoma: why? Eur Urol 45:539

  17. Cumberbatch MGK, Foerster B, Catto JWF et al (2018) Repeat transurethral resection in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 73:925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naselli A, Hurle R, Paparella S et al (2018) Role of restaging transurethral resection for T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 4:558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gontero P, Sylvester R, Pisano F et al (2016) The impact of re-transurethral resection on clinical outcomes in a large multicentre cohort of patients with T1 high-grade/Grade 3 bladder cancer treated with bacille Calmette-Guérin. BJU Int 118:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Audenet F, Retinger C, Chien C et al (2017) Is restaging transurethral resection necessary in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and limited lamina propria invasion? Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig 35:603

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gendy R, Delprado W, Brenner P et al (2016) Repeat transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a contemporary series. BJU Int 117:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sfakianos JP, Kim PH, Hakimi AA et al (2014) The effect of restaging transurethral resection on recurrence and progression rates in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer treated with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Urol 191:341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim W, Song C, Park S et al (2012) Value of immediate second resection of the tumor bed to improve the effectiveness of transurethral resection of bladder tumor. J Endourol 26:1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mack D, Höltl W, Bassi P et al (2001) The ablative effect of quarter dose bacillus Calmette-Guerin on a papillary marker lesion of the bladder. J Urol 165:401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashine K, Ide T, Nakashima T et al (2016) Results of second transurethral resection for high-grade T1 bladder cancer. Urol Ann 8:10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iida K, Naiki T, Kawai N et al (2016) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy after the second transurethral resection significantly decreases recurrence in patients with new onset high-grade T1 bladder cancer. BMC Urol 16:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Herr HW (2005) Restaging transurethral resection of high risk superficial bladder cancer improves the initial response to bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. J Urol 174:2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Angulo JC, Palou J, García-Tello A et al (2014) Second transurethral resection and prognosis of high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in patients not receiving bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Actas Urol Esp 38:164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mowatt G, N’Dow J, Vale L et al (2011) Photodynamic diagnosis of bladder cancer compared with white light cystoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burger M, Grossman HB, Droller M et al (2013) Photodynamic diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with hexaminolevulinate cystoscopy: a meta-analysis of detection and recurrence based on raw data. Eur Urol 64:846

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Askin Eroglu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eroglu, A., Ekin, R.G., Koc, G. et al. The prognostic value of routine second transurethral resection in patients with newly diagnosed stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from randomized 10-year extension trial. Int J Clin Oncol 25, 698–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01581-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01581-0

Keywords

Navigation