Abstract
Climate change can negatively impact plant–pollinator interactions, and reduce outcross pollination. For reproductive assurance, an increased capacity for autonomous selfing should benefit the persistence of plants under new temperature conditions. Plastic responses of the autonomous selfing capacity to climate change may occur indirectly due to changes in floral traits associated with this capacity. We tested whether the mixed mating plant Mimulus guttatus is capable of plastic changes in floral traits favoring autonomous selfing in response to temperature changes. In seven growth chambers, we grew M. guttatus originating from a large range of latitudes (from 37.89° N to 49.95° N) and thus home temperatures in North America, and experimentally assessed the (autonomous) selfing and outcrossing capacities of the plants. With an increase in the difference between the overall mean daytime and nighttime experimental test temperature and home temperature, flower length and width decreased. The plastic response in flower size suggests that plants may be more successful at autonomous selfing. However, we did not find direct evidence that M. guttatus responded to increased temperature by an increased autonomous selfing capacity. With an increase in temperature difference, the odds of seed production, number of seeds, and individual seed mass decreased. Our results indicate that global warming and the associated increase in extreme temperature events may be detrimental to the reproduction and thus persistence of some plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarssen LW (2000) Why are most selfers annuals? A new hypothesis for the fitness benefit of selfing. Oikos 89:606–612. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890321.x
Arathi H, Kelly JK (2004) Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. Int J Plant Sci 165:1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.1086/423876
Ascher PD, Peloquin S (1966) Influence of temperature on incompatible and compatible pollen tube growth in Lilium longiflorum. Can J Genet Cytol 8:661–664. https://doi.org/10.1139/g66-081
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Beauzamy L, Nakayama N, Boudaoud A (2014) Flowers under pressure: ins and outs of turgor regulation in development. Ann Bot 114:1517–1533. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu187
Bodbyl Roels SA, Kelly JK (2011) Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 65:2541–2552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01326.x
Brys R, Geens B, Beeckman T, Jacquemyn H (2013) Differences in dichogamy and herkogamy contribute to higher selfing in contrasting environments in the annual Blackstonia perfoliata (Gentianaceae). Ann Bot 111:651–661. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct031
Burkle LA, Marlin JC, Knight TM (2013) Plant–pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function. Science 339:1611–1615. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232728
Carr DE, Fenster CB (1994) Levels of genetic variation and covariation for Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) floral traits. Heredity 72:606–618
Carroll AB, Pallardy SG, Galen C (2001) Drought stress, plant water status, and floral trait expression in fireweed, Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 88:438–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657108
Caruso CM (2006) Plasticity of inflorescence traits in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae) in response to soil water availability. Am J Bot 93:531–538. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.4.531
Chevin L-M, Hoffmann AA (2017) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0138
Cohen JM, Lajeunesse MJ, Rohr JR (2018) A global synthesis of animal phenological responses to climate change. Nat Clim Change 8:224–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0067-3
Colegrave N, Ruxton GD (2017) Using biological insight and pragmatism when thinking about pseudoreplication. Trends Ecol Evol 33:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.10.007
Dole JA (1992) Reproductive assurance mechanisms in three taxa of the Mimulus guttatus complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 79:650–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb14607.x
Eckert CG, Ozimec B, Herlihy CR, Griffin CA, Routley MB (2009) Floral morphology mediates temporal variation in the mating system of a self-compatible plant. Ecology 90:1540–1548. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1063.1
Eckert CG et al (2010) Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 25:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.013
Egli D, Wardlaw I (1980) Temperature response of seed growth characteristics of soybeans. Agron J 72:560–564. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200030036x
Elle E, Hare J (2002) Environmentally induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii. Funct Ecol 16:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00599.x
Evans ME, Hearn DJ, Theiss KE, Cranston K, Holsinger KE, Donoghue MJ (2011) Extreme environments select for reproductive assurance: evidence from evening primroses (Oenothera). New Phytol 191:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03697.x
Fenster CB, Ritland K (1994) Evidence for natural selection on mating system in Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae). Int J Plant Sci 155:588–596. https://doi.org/10.1086/297197
Fishman L, Willis JH (2008) Pollen limitation and natural selection on floral characters in the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 177:802–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02265.x
Gervasi DD, Schiestl FP (2017) Real-time divergent evolution in plants driven by pollinators. Nat Commun 8:14691. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14691
Ghalambor CK, McKay JK, Carroll SP, Reznick DN (2007) Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct Ecol 21:394–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2007.01283.x
Hedhly A, Hormaza J, Herrero M (2003) The effect of temperature on stigmatic receptivity in sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.). Plant Cell Environ 26:1673–1680. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01085.x
Hedhly A, Hormaza JI, Herrero M (2009) Global warming and sexual plant reproduction. Trends Plant Sci 14:30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.001
Herlihy CR, Eckert CG (2002) Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416:320–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/416320a
IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
Ivey CT, Carr DE (2005) Effects of herbivory and inbreeding on the pollinators and mating system of Mimulus guttatus (Phrymaceae). Am J Bot 92:1641–1649. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.10.1641
Ivey CT, Carr DE (2011) Tests for the joint evolution of mating system and drought escape in Mimulus. Ann Bot 109:583–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr160
Jones N, Husband B, MacDougall A (2013) Reproductive system of a mixed-mating plant responds to climate perturbation by increased selfing. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 280:20131336. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1336
Kaiser-Bunbury CN, Muff S, Memmott J, Müller CB, Caflisch A (2010) The robustness of pollination networks to the loss of species and interactions: a quantitative approach incorporating pollinator behaviour. Ecol Lett 13:442–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01437.x
Kalisz S, Vogler DW, Hanley KM (2004) Context-dependent autonomous self-fertilization yields reproductive assurance and mixed mating. Nature 430:884–887. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02776
Kay KM, Picklum DA (2013) Drought alters the expression of mating system traits in two species of Clarkia. Evol Ecol 27:899–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9630-6
Kearns CA, Inouye DW (1993) Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot
Koski MH, Kuo L, Niedermaier KM, Galloway LF (2018) Timing is everything: dichogamy and pollen germinability underlie variation in autonomous selfing among populations. Am J Bot 105:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1025
Leclerc-Potvin C, Ritland K (1994) Modes of self-fertilization in Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae): a field experiment. Am J Bot 81:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15430.x
Leibman L, Rowe A, Koski MH, Galloway LF (2018) Populations with greater flexibility in floral traits modify mating system in response to the pollinator environment. Funct Ecol 32:1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13093
Lekberg Y, Roskilly B, Hendrick MF, Zabinski CA, Barr CM, Fishman L (2012) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation among yellow monkeyflower populations from thermal and non-thermal soils in Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia 170:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2297-9
Levin DA (2010) Environment-enhanced self-fertilization: implications for niche shifts in adjacent populations. J Ecol 98:1276–1283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01715.x
Liu F, Eugenio EC (2018) A review and comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based inferences in beta regression and zero-or-one-inflated beta regression. Stat Methods Med Res 27:1024–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216650699
Liu F, Kong Y (2015) zoib: an R package for bayesian inference for beta regression and zero/one inflated beta regression. RJ 7:34–51
Lloyd DG, Schoen DJ (1992) Self-and cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int J Plant Sci 153:358–369. https://doi.org/10.1086/297040
Mal TK, Lovett-Doust J (2005) Phenotypic plasticity in vegetative and reproductive traits in an invasive weed, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae), in response to soil moisture. Am J Bot 92:819–825. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.92.5.819
Martin NH (2004) Flower size preferences of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) foraging on Mimulus guttatus (Scrophulariaceae). Evol Ecol Res 6:777–782
Memmott J, Craze PG, Waser NM, Price MV (2007) Global warming and the disruption of plant–pollinator interactions. Ecol Lett 10:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01061.x
Mu J et al (2015) Artificial asymmetric warming reduces nectar yield in a Tibetan alpine species of Asteraceae. Ann Bot 116:899–906. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv042
Nicotra AB et al (2010) Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends Plant Sci 15:684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
Opedal ØH, Listemann J, Albertsen E, Armbruster WS, Pélabon C (2016) Multiple effects of drought on pollination and mating-system traits in Dalechampia scandens. Int J Plant Sci 177:682–693. https://doi.org/10.1086/687985
Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110100
Parmesan C, Hanley ME (2015) Plants and climate change: complexities and surprises. Ann Bot 116:849–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv169
Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
Pearson S, Parker A, Adams SR, Hadley P, May DR (1995) The effects of temperature on the flower size of pansy (Viola x wittrockiana Gams.). J Hortic Sci 70:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.1995.11515287
R Core Team (2012) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Razanajatovo M, Föhr C, van Kleunen M, Fischer M (2018) Phenological shifts and flower visitation of 185 lowland and alpine species in a lowland botanical garden. Alpine Botany 128:23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00035-018-0201-x
Ritland C, Ritland K (1989) Variation of sex allocation among eight taxa of the Mimulus guttatus species complex (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 76:1731–1739. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1989.tb15163.x
Robertson AW, Mountjoy C, Faulkner BE, Roberts MV, Macnair MR (1999) Bumble bee selection of Mimulus guttatus flowers: the effects of pollen quality and reward depletion. Ecology 80:2594–2606. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5b2594:bbsomg%5d2.0.co;2
Sheridan JA, Bickford D (2011) Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change. Nat Clim Change 1:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1259
Sicard A, Lenhard M (2011) The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Ann Bot 107:1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr023
Spigler RB, Kalisz S (2013) Phenotypic plasticity in mating-system traits in the annual Collinsia verna. Botany 91:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2012-0227
Travers SE, Mena-Ali J, Stephenson AG (2004) Plasticity in the self-incompatibility system of Solanum carolinense. Plant Species Biol 19:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2004.00109.x
Vallejo-Marín M, Barrett SC (2009) Modification of flower architecture during early stages in the evolution of self-fertilization. Ann Bot 103:951–962. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp015
Van Etten ML, Brunet J (2013) The impact of global warming on floral traits that affect the selfing rate in a high-altitude plant. Int J Plant Sci 174:1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1086/671805
van Kleunen M (2007) Adaptive genetic differentiation in life-history traits between populations of Mimulus guttatus with annual and perennial life-cycles. Evol Ecol 21:185–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-0019-7
van Kleunen M, Ritland K (2004) Predicting evolution of floral traits associated with mating system in a natural plant population. J Evol Biol 17:1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00787.x
van Kleunen M, Dawson W, Bossdorf O, Fischer M (2014) The more the merrier: multi-species experiments in ecology. Basic Appl Ecol 15:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.10.006
van Kleunen M, Röckle M, Stift M (2015) Admixture between native and invasive populations may increase invasiveness of Mimulus guttatus. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 282:20151487. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1487
van Kleunen M, Pyšek P, Dawson W, Essl F, Kreft H, Pergl J, Weigelt P, Stein A, Dullinger S, König C, Lenzner B, Maurel N, Moser D, Seebens H, Kartesz J, Nishino M, Aleksanyan A, Ansong M, Antonova LA, Barcelona JF, Breckle SW, Brundu G, Cabezas FJ, Cárdenas D, Cárdenas-Toro J, Castano N, Chacón E, Chatelain C, Conn B, de Sá Dechoum M, Dufour-Dror JM, Ebel AL, Figueiredo E, Fragman-Sapir O, Fuentes N, Groom QJ, Henderson L, Inderjit Jogan N, Krestov P, Kupriyanov A, Masciadri S, Meerman J, Morozova O, Nickrent D, Nowak A, Patzelt A, Pelser PB, Shu WS, Thomas J, Uludag A, Velayos M, Verkhosina A, Villasenor JL, Weber E, Wieringa JJ, Yazlik A, Zeddam A, Zykova E, Winter M (2019) The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100:e02542. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2542
Vogler DW, Das C, Stephenson AG (1998) Phenotypic plasticity in the expression of self-incompatibility in Campanula rapunculoides. Heredity 81:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00417.x
Vogler DW, Peretz S, Stephenson AG (1999) Floral plasticity in an iteroparous plant: the interactive effects of genotype, environment, and ontogeny in Campanula rapunculoides (Campanulaceae). Am J Bot 86:482–494. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656809
Zuur A, Ieno E, Walker N, Saveliev A, Smith G (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York
Acknowledgements
We thank Otmar Ficht and Claudia Martin for their help in sowing the seeds, Heinz Vahlenkamp for taking care of the growth chambers, Marc Stift for helpful discussions, and Vanessa Pasqualetto for her help in weighing and counting seeds. M.R. thanks the German Research Foundation DFG for funding (RA 3009/1-1).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MR, LF and MvK designed the study, LF conducted the experiment, MR, LF and MvK analyzed the data, and MR wrote the manuscript with input from LF and MvK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Amy Parachnowitsch.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razanajatovo, M., Fischer, L. & van Kleunen, M. Do floral traits and the selfing capacity of Mimulus guttatus plastically respond to experimental temperature changes?. Oecologia 192, 261–272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04558-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04558-y