Abstract
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to summarise the current state of knowledge concerning known types of gain, the reasons why patients might seek it, as well as implications for headache disorders.
Recent Findings
Even though the subject has been studied in the past, it received less attention in recent years.
Summary
There is no doubt that migraine is a highly disabling disorder. However, attacks sometimes may be beneficial for the migraine brain as a time-out from the daily routine. On the other hand, patients are often stigmatised as trying to satisfy other needs through their disease. These “other needs” may be the exaggerated seeking for attention and affection or an undue official sickness certificate and were named secondary gain. Striving for secondary gain denotes a behaviour that aims at benefiting from a disease in a way that is seen as inappropriate by others. The fact that the term has persisted in doctors’ vocabulary for decades probably indicates that it designates a concept considered relevant by many. However, its usage is complicated by its usually imprecise definition. We found in a literature search that the strive for secondary gain is not limited to neurosis, might both occur consciously and unconsciously, sometimes may aim at financial gain and sometimes at social gain, and can either be potentially expected or readily obtained. This behaviour mainly seems to aim at shaping one’s interactions with the environment. Its causes have not been elucidated completely, though, but “unrequited demands for love, attention and affection” have been postulated. The desire for social gain can be influenced by approaches based upon behavioural psychology. Broaching the issue of secondary gain may be beneficial in the daily clinical routine.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CH:
-
Cluster headache
- cM:
-
Chronic migraine
- CPSP:
-
Central post stroke pain
- eM:
-
Episodic migraine
- LBP:
-
Lower back pain
- n/a:
-
Not applicable
- SFN:
-
Small fibre neuropathy
- TN :
-
Trigeminal neuralgia
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia, 2018. 38(1): p. 1-211.
Dodick DW. Migraine. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1315–30.
Stovner LJ, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):954–76.
Young WB, et al. The stigma of migraine. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54074.
Lampl C, et al. Interictal burden attributable to episodic headache: findings from the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain. 2016;17:9.
Caspermeyer JJ, et al. Evaluation of stigmatizing language and medical errors in neurology coverage by US newspapers. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81(3):300–6.
Parikh SK, Young WB. Migraine: stigma in society. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(1):8.
Katz J. On primary gain and secondary gain. Psychoanal Study Child. 1963;18:9–50.
Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse. 4th ed. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag; 2009
•• Loder E. What is the evolutionary advantage of migraine? Cephalalgia. 2002;22(8):624–32. Very interesting article in which possible positive aspects of suffering from migraine attacks are discussed from an evolutionist standpoint.
Stout MA. A cognitive-behavioral study of self-reported stress factors in migraine headache. Psychopathology. 1984;17:290–296. https://doi.org/10.1159/000284064
Aubuchon P, Haber JD, Adams HE. Can migraine headaches be modified by operant pain techniques? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1985;16(3):261–3.
Haber, J.D., Psychophysiological correlates of secondary gain factors in migraine. 1985. 5(3_suppl): p. 230-231.
van Egmond JJ. The multiple meanings of secondary gain. Am J Psychoanal. 2003;63(2):137–47.
Fishbain DA. Secondary gain concept. APS J. 1994;3(4):264–73.
Raskin M. Diagnosis of conversion reactions. Jama. 1966;197(7):530.
WOLFF HG. Personality features and reactions of subjects with migraine. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1937;37(4):895–921.
Davis RE, Smitherman TA, Baskin SM. Personality traits, personality disorders, and migraine: a review. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(Suppl 1):S7–10.
Barlow DH, et al. The origins of neuroticism. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9(5):481–96.
•• Borsook D, et al. Understanding migraine through the lens of maladaptive stress responses: a model disease of allostatic load. Neuron. 2012;73(2):219–34. The authors of that very interesting article hypothesise that migraine attacks might be the result of a dysfunctional attempt to maintain physiological stability in the face of psychological or physiological stressors.
Kelman L. The triggers or precipitants of the acute migraine attack. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(5):394–402.
Peroutka SJ. What turns on a migraine? A systematic review of migraine precipitating factors. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2014;18(10):454.
Hougaard A, et al. Provocation of migraine with aura using natural trigger factors. Neurology. 2013;80(5):428–31.
de Tommaso M, et al. Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(3):144–55.
Chen WT, et al. Peri-ictal normalization of visual cortex excitability in migraine: an MEG study. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(11):1202–11.
Judit A, Sandor PS, Schoenen J. Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. Cephalalgia. 2000;20(8):714–9.
Hellstrom C, Carlsson SG. Busy with pain: disorganization in subjective time in experimental pain. Eur J Pain. 1997;1(2):133–9.
Giffin NJ, et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology. 2003;60(6):935–40.
Rains JC, et al. Behavioral headache treatment: history, review of the empirical literature, and methodological critique. Headache. 2005;45(Suppl 2):S92–109.
Sarwer-Foner GJ, Dancy TE. The psychodynamic basis of compensation: a contribution to the study of ego defences. Can Psychiatr Assoc J. 1959;4(2):125–32.
King SA. Concept of secondary gain. APS J. 1994;3(4):279–81.
Miller H. Accident neurosis. Br Med J. 1961;1(5230):919–25.
Fishbain DA. Response to Drs. Gallagher, King, and Large. APS J. 1994:3(4).
Ciccone DS, Just N, Bandilla EB. A comparison of economic and social reward in patients with chronic nonmalignant back pain. Psychosom Med. 1999;61(4):552–63.
Flor H, Kerns RD, Turk DC. The role of spouse reinforcement, perceived pain, and activity levels of chronic pain patients. J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(2):251–9.
International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. - 10th revision. Fifth edition ed. 2016: World Health Organization.
Weighill VE. ‘Compensation neurosis’: a review of the literature. J Psychosom Res. 1983;27(2):97–104.
Winckler P. The concept of “compensation neurosis” in psychiatric expertise. Versicherungsmedizin. 1998;50(6):219–25.
Hall RC, Hall RC. Compensation neurosis: a too quickly forgotten concept? J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(3):390–8.
Fordyce WE, et al. Pain measurement and pain behavior. Pain. 1984;18(1):53–69.
Finkel AG, et al. Headache in military service members with a history of mild traumatic brain injury: a cohort study of diagnosis and classification. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(6):548–59.
Gladstone J. From psychoneurosis to ICHD-2: an overview of the state of the art in post-traumatic headache. Headache. 2009;49(7):1097–111.
Saper JR. Posttraumatic headache: a neurobehavioral disorder. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(12):1776–8 discussion 1780-1.
Evans RW. Posttraumatic headaches in civilians, soldiers, and athletes. Neurol Clin. 2014;32(2):283–303.
Sterling M, et al. Prognosis after whiplash injury: where to from here? Discussion paper 4. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(25 Suppl):S330–4.
Schrader H, et al. Natural evolution of late whiplash syndrome outside the medicolegal context. Lancet. 1996;347(9010):1207–11.
Miller H. Accident neurosis. Br Med J. 1961;1(5231):992–8.
Young JN, et al. Lumbar disc surgery in a fixed compensation population: a model for influence of secondary gain on surgical outcome. Surg Neurol. 1997;48(6):552–8 discussion 558-9.
Gotten N. Survey of one hundred cases of whiplash injury after settlement of litigation. J Am Med Assoc. 1956;162(9).
Rohling ML, Binder LM, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J. Money matters: a meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychol. 1995;14(6):537–47.
Mendelson G. Follow-up studies of personal injury litigants. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1984;7(2):179–88.
Mendelson G. ‘Compensation neurosis’ revisited: outcome studies of the effects of litigation. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39(6):695–706.
van Egmond JJ. Beyond secondary gain. Am J Psychoanal. 2005;65(2):167–77.
Fordyce WE, Fowler RS, DeLateur B. An application of behavior modification technique to a problem of chronic pain. Behav Res Ther. 1968;6(1):105–7.
Block AR, Kremer EF, Gaylor M. Behavioral treatment of chronic pain: the spouse as a discriminative cue for pain behavior. Pain. 1980;9(2):243–52.
Montagna P, Pierangeli G, Cortelli P. The primary headaches as a reflection of genetic darwinian adaptive behavioral responses. Headache. 2010;50(2):273–89.
Fordyce WE, et al. Some implications of learning in problems of chronic pain. J Chronic Dis. 1968;21(3):179–90.
Fordyce W, et al. Pain complaint--exercise performance relationship in chronic pain. Pain. 1981;10(3):311–21.
Fordyce WE, Roberts AH, Sternbach RA. The behavioral management of chronic pain: a response to critics. Pain. 1985;22(2):113–25.
Kwon M, et al. The role of descending inhibitory pathways on chronic pain modulation and clinical implications. Pain Pract. 2014;14(7):656–67.
Cornell Law School. Jacobellis v. Ohio. [cited 2019 13.03.2019]; Available from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/378/184.
Gallagher RM. Secondary gain in pain medicine. APS J. 1994;3(4):274–8.
Funding
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: HP was funded by the Werner Dessauer Stiftung.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Episodic Migraine
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pohl, H., Schubring-Giese, M. & Gantenbein, A.R. Can Anything Good Ever Come From Bearing Migraine Attacks? Suggestions for a Comprehensive Concept of Gain in Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23, 90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0829-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-019-0829-2