Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Automatic self-focused and situation-focused reappraisal of disgusting emotion by implementation intention: an ERP study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Neurodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Detachment (self-focused) and positive reinterpretation (situation-focused) are two important forms of cognitive reappraisal during emotion regulation. Previous research shows situation-focused reappraisal to be more effective than self-focused reappraisal for intentional emotion regulation. How the two differ in emotional consequences as components of automatic emotion regulation is however unclear. In the current study, event-related potentials were recorded to clarify this problem, while participants passively viewed disgusting or neutral scenes or formed implementation intentions based on self-focused or situation-focused reappraisal. Behavioural results showed fewer negative emotions during self-focused reappraisal than during either situation-focused reappraisal or free viewing (which had similar emotion ratings). In addition, self-reported cognitive cost was not enhanced during the two forms of reappraisal compared to passive viewing. Late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes for disgusting stimuli were larger than those elicited for neutral stimuli, at both frontal and posterior-parietal regions. This amplitude enhancement effect, irrespective of whether frontal or parietal LPP were involved, was found to be weaker during self-focused reappraisal than when participants were engaged in situation-focused reappraisal or passive viewing. The latter two conditions showed similar amplitude enhancement. These findings suggest that automatic self-focused reappraisal by implementation intention produces more favourable emotion regulation than situation-focused reappraisal, without enhancing cognitive cost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayduk O, Kross E (2008) Enhancing the pace of recovery: self distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychol Sci 19:229–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02073.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernat EM, Cadwallader M, Seo D, Vizueta N, Patrick CJ (2011) Effects of instructed emotion regulation on valence, arousal, and attentional measures of affective processing. Dev Neuropsychol 36(4):493–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhle JT, Silvers JA, Wager TD, Lopez R, Onyemekwu C, Kober H et al (2014) Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex 24(11):2981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Butler EA, Egloff B, Wilhelm FH, Smith NC, Erickson EA, Gross JJ (2003) The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion 3(1):48–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 52:95–111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JI, Gross JJ, Ochsner KN (2011) Psychological distance and emotional experience: what you see is what you get. Emotion 11:438–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis A, Bos MW, Nordgren LF, Van Baaren RB (2006) On making the right choice: the deliberation without-attention effect. Science 311:1005–1007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dörfel D, Lamke JP, Hummel F, Wagner U, Erk S, Walter H (2014) Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by detachment, reinterpretation, distraction, and expressive suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation. NeuroImage 101:298–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth 39(2):175–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gailliot MT, Baumeister RF, DeWall CN, Maner JK, Plant EA, Tice DM, Schmeichel BJ (2007) Self-control relies on glucose as a limited energy source: willpower is more than a metaphor. J Pers Soc Psychol 92(2):325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo IS, Keil A, Mc Culloch KC, Rockstroh B, Gollwitzer PM (2006) Strategic automation of emotion control. J Person Soc Psychol 96:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo IS, Keil A, McCulloch KC, Rockstroh B, Gollwitzer PM (2009) Strategic automation of emotion regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol 96(1):11–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallo IS, McCulloch KC, Gollwitzer PM (2012) Differential effects of various types of implementation intentions on the regulation of disgust. Soc Cogn 30(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin PR, McRae K, Ramel W, Gross JJ (2008) The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biol Psychiat 63(6):577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.05.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM (1993) Goal achievement: the role of intentions. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 4(1):141–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 54(7):493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P (2006) Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38:69–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross JJ (1998) Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol 74(1):224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross JJ (2002) Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology 39:281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross JJ (2014) Emotion regulation: conceptual and empirical foundation. In: Gross JJ (ed) Handbook of emotion regulation, 2nd edn, Guilford Press: New York, pp 3–20

  • Hajcak G, Nieuwenhuis S (2006) Reappraisal modulates the electrocortical response to unpleasant pictures. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajcak G, Macnamara A, Olvet DM (2010) Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: an integrative review. Dev Neuropsychol 35(2):129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hajcak G, Dunning JP, Foti D, Weinberg A (2014) Temporal dynamics of emotion regulation. In: Gross JJ (ed) Handbook of emotion regulation, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New York, pp 441–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang YX, Luo YJ (2004) Native assessment of international affective picture system. Chin Mental Health J 9:631–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok A (2001) On the utility of p3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 38(3):557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1999) International affective picture system (IAPS): technical manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman N, Sagristano MD, Trope Y (2002) The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J Exp Soc Psychol 38:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00535-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck SJ (2005) An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod AK, Conway C (2007) Well-being and positive future thinking for the self versus others. Cogn Emot 21(5):1114–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss IB, Bunge SA, Gross JJ (2007) Automatic emotion regulation. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 1(1):146–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00005.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer JD, Salovey P (1995) Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Appl Prev Psychol 4(3):197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser JS, Hartwig R, Moran TP, Jendrusina AA, Kross E (2014) Neural markers of positive reappraisal and their associations with trait reappraisal and worry. J Abnorm Psychol 123:91–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF (1998) Self-control as a limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. J Personal Soc Psychol 74(3):774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00298.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JD (2002) Rethinking feelings: an FMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J Cogn Neurosci 14(8):1215–1229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochsner KN, Ray RD, Cooper JC, Robertson ER, Chopra S, Gabrieli JD, Gross JJ (2004) For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion. NeuroImage 23:483–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paul S, Simon D, Kniesche R, Kathmann N, Endrass T (2013) Timing effects of antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation strategies. Biol Psychol 94:136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI, Snyder CRR (1975) Attention and cognitive control. In: Solso RL (ed) Information processing and cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards JM, Gross JJ (1999) Composure at any cost? The cognitive consequences of emotion suppression. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(8):1033–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards JM, Gross JJ (2000) Emotion regulation and memory: the cognitive costs of keeping one’s cool. J Pers Soc Psychol 79(3):410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saito M, Ishida T (2002) Cognitive resource model for the information-processing of task-irrelevant visual stimuli. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 56(2):145–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schönfelder S, Kanske P, Heissler J, Wessa M (2014) Time course of emotion-related responding during distraction and reappraisal. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9:1310–1319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir R, Schwartz N, Blechert J, Sheppes G (2015) Emotional intensity influences pre-implementation and implementation of distraction and reappraisal. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 10:1329–1337

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin RM, Schneider W (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol Rev 84(2):127–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiota MN, Levenson RW (2009) Effects of aging on experimentally instructed detached reappraisal, positive reappraisal, and emotional behavior suppression. Psychol Aging 24(4):890–900

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shiota MN, Levenson RW (2012) Turn down the volume or change the channel? Emotional effects of detached versus positive reappraisal. J Pers Soc Psychol 103(3):416–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tamir M, Mauss I (2011) Social cognitive factors in emotion regulation: implications for well-being. In: Nyklíček I, Vingerhoets A, Zeelenberg M (eds) Emotion regulation and well-being. Springer, New York, pp 31–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thiruchselvam R, Blechert J, Sheppes G, Rydstrom A, Gross JJ (2011) The temporal dynamics of emotion regulation: an EEG study of distraction and reappraisal. Biol Psychol 87:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urry HL (2010) Seeing, thinking, and feeling: emotion-regulating effects of gaze-directed cognitive reappraisal. Emotion 1:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dillen LF, Koole SL (2007) Clearing the mind: a working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion 7(4):715–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb TL, Miles E, Sheeran P (2012) Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychol Bull 138(4):775–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Bargh JA, Nocera CC, Gray JR (2009) The unconscious regulation of emotion: nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. Emotion 9(6):847–854. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017745

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Willroth EC, Hilimire MR (2016) Differential effects of self- and situation-focused reappraisal. Emotion 16:468–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Mulej Bratec S, Schmid G, Meng C, Doll A, Wohlschläger A, Finke K, Förstl H, Zimmer C, Pekrun R, Sorg C (2016) How do you make me feel better? Social cognitive emotion regulation and the default mode network. NeuroImage 134:270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Meng X, Yang J, Yao G, Hu L, Yuan H (2012) The valence strength of unpleasant emotion modulates brain processing of behavioral inhibitory control: neural correlates. Biol Psychol 89(1):240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Long Q, Ding N, Lou Y, Liu Y, Yang J (2015a) Suppression dampens unpleasant emotion faster than reappraisal: neural dynamics in a Chinese sample. Sci China Life Sci 58:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan J, Ding N, Liu Y, Yang J (2015b) Unconscious emotion regulation: nonconscious reappraisal decreases emotion-related physiological reactivity during frustration. Cognit Emot 29(6):1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.965663

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31671164, 31871103, 31600886).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Bin Ma and Xian Xin Meng are first authors of equal contribution to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Affect Cognition and Regulation Laboratory (ACRLab), Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Bin Ma, Quanshan Long, Zhongming Zhang, Shengdong Chen, Jiemin Yang, Xuan Zhang & Jiajin Yuan

  2. School of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Cangshan Campus, No. 8 Shangsan Road, Cangshan District, Fuzhou, 350007, Fujian, China

    Xian Xin Meng

Authors
  1. Bin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xian Xin Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Quanshan Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhongming Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shengdong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiemin Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xuan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jiajin Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiajin Yuan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, B., Meng, X.X., Long, Q. et al. Automatic self-focused and situation-focused reappraisal of disgusting emotion by implementation intention: an ERP study. Cogn Neurodyn 13, 567–577 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09542-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09542-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation