Percutaneous Pinning for Fracture Repair in Dogs and Cats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.09.001Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Pinning is the treatment of choice for the surgical repair of simple physeal fractures.

  • All traditional principles of intramedullary or cross-pinning apply when considering the use of percutaneous pinning.

  • Fractures should ideally be minimally displaced with a significant portion of bridging periosteum remaining intact.

  • A thorough physical and orthopedic examination should be performed to identify any serious concomitant injury.

  • For closed reduction of physeal fractures, the precise technique

Case selection

Traditional principles of case selection for intramedullary or cross-pinning stabilization of fractures apply when considering patients as candidates for percutaneous pinning. Salter-Harris type I and II physeal fractures are the most amenable to percutaneous pinning stabilization, for several reasons. Pins mainly serve to counteract bending forces, whereas rotational and compressive forces are poorly neutralized, even when multiple pins are used. Therefore, juxta-articular, noncomminuted

Preoperative management and planning

Preoperative planning for percutaneous pinning fracture stabilization must begin with appropriate case selection, as already described. A thorough physical and orthopedic examination should be performed to identify any significant concomitant injury. At a minimum, thoracic radiographs and orthogonal projection radiographs of the affected bone are acquired. Radiographs typically require moderate sedation or anesthesia to achieve optimal positioning and projections. It is strongly recommended

Preparation and patient positioning

At the time of surgery, the entire affected limb must be aseptically prepared to enable adequate intraoperative maneuvering required for closed reduction and percutaneous insertion of pins. A full limb preparation is also required to allow conversion to a traditional open approach if needed. The hanging limb preparation is useful to fatigue contracted muscles and facilitate closed reduction. Femoral capital physeal fractures are approached with the patient in lateral recumbency, affected limb

Fracture reduction and surgical approach

For closed reduction of physeal fractures, the precise technique depends on the bone, the involved physis, and the direction and degree of displacement of the epiphysis. The first principle in reduction is to minimize harm to the physis. To achieve this, the maneuver should generally be 90% traction and 10% leverage.14 Initial traction may slightly increase the displacement and angular malalignment at the fracture site. The epiphysis is then translated into alignment while maintaining traction.

Surgical procedure

General principles of traditional open physeal fracture repair with pins must be adhered to with percutaneous pinning. To decrease the risk of premature physeal closure, pins must be placed as perpendicular to the physeal plate as possible. Angulation of pins greater than 45° to the physis predisposes to epiphysiodesis.16 Threaded pins are not routinely used by the authors for percutaneous pinning because of the inherent weakness at the thread-shaft interface, risk of hindering longitudinal

Immediate postoperative care

Fracture reduction and pin placement are carefully assessed on postoperative radiographs. For all cases, parenteral analgesia is administered for up to 12 hours to address immediate postoperative pain. Because of the limited soft tissue trauma induced by surgery, analgesic requirements are expected to be substantially lower than if the procedure was performed with a traditional open approach. There are very few risk factors for infection (clean procedures, young patients, minimal surgical

Rehabilitation and recovery

Early return to weight bearing and good limb function is anticipated following percutaneous pinning. Because the minimum size and number of pins that will provide adequate stability are typically used, cage rest should be strictly enforced until complete union of the fracture is documented. If strict crate rest is not enforced, these repairs are at high risk for implant failure and pin migration. With preservation of surrounding soft tissue structures and the tremendous capacity for healing

Clinical results

Percutaneous pinning for tibial and femoral fractures was first described in 1989, although it was performed in a “blind” manner without intraoperative fluoroscopy.17 Osseous union was achieved in 55 of 56 fractures treated in this manner. Age, body weight, fracture type, and time from injury to repair were found to influence overall outcome in these cases. A small retrospective case series on percutaneous pinning under fluoroscopic guidance was described in abstract format.7 In this report, 3

Summary

Percutaneous pinning is a feasible and safe method for stabilizing selected Salter-Harris type I and II physeal fractures in dogs and cats. Surgical intervention must be performed soon after the time of trauma, otherwise closed reduction cannot be achieved. The procedure is technically demanding; surgeon experience, intraoperative fluoroscopy, appropriate surgical instrumentation, and strict case selection are all required for consistent successful outcomes. Although clinical comparisons

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (17)

  • K.R. Presnell

    Pins versus plates: the orthopedic dilemma

    Vet Clin North Am

    (1978)
  • C.L. Boekhout-Ta et al.

    Closed reduction and fluoroscopic-assisted percutaneous pinning of 42 physeal fractures in 37 dogs and 4 cats

    Vet Surg

    (2017)
  • D.J.F. Pfeil von et al.

    Percutaneous tibial physeal fracture repair in small animals: technique and 17 cases

    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol

    (2017)
  • V. Brioschi et al.

    Combined physeal fractures of the distal radius and ulna: complications associated with K-wire fixation and long-term prognosis in six cats

    J Feline Med Surg

    (2017)
  • R.B. Parker et al.

    Modified intramedullary pin technique for repair of distal femoral physeal fractures in the dog and cat

    J Am Vet Med Assoc

    (1984)
  • J.R. Campbell

    The technique of fixation of fractures of the distal femur using Rush pins

    J Small Anim Pract

    (1976)
  • A. Pozzi et al.

    Percutaneous pinning of growth plate fractures in dogs

    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol

    (2011)
  • H.R. Fischer et al.

    Surgical reduction and stabilization for repair of femoral capital physeal fractures in cats: 13 cases (1998–2002)

    J Am Vet Med Assoc

    (2004)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

The article is an update of “Kim SE, Hudson CC, Pozzi A. Percutaneous pinning for fracture repair in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2012;42(5):963-74.”

View full text