Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Obtaining precise and accurate results by ITC

  • Methods Paper
  • Published:
European Biophysics Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Acquisition of precise and accurate results by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) can be achieved through thoughtful experimental design and modeling and careful experimental operations. Large reported errors in ITC results in determinations of stoichiometries, equilibrium constants and enthalpy changes for ligand binding to proteins are the consequence of poor experiment design, failure to properly calibrate and test instruments and protocols, lack of controls, errors in solution preparation, and incorrect data analyses. Analysis of a recent report that claimed to have determined the “repeatability, precision, and accuracy of the enthalpies and Gibbs energies of a protein–ligand binding reaction” by ITC is used to illustrate how to improve ITC operations and results. The analysis shows that the reported results are misleading because calorimeters were not calibrated, operating parameters were not optimized, errors were made in solution preparations, and data analysis was not optimized. As a consequence, the results do not provide a valid comparison of the capabilities of the calorimeters included in the study. A proposal that reaction of acetazolamide with carbonic anhydrase II be used as a comparison standard for testing ITCs and procedures is problematic because the binding constant is too large and for several other reasons discussed in the paper. Requirements for obtaining precise and accurate results by ITC are discussed and experimental results are presented to illustrate the precision and accuracy attainable with low volume ITCs. The problem of the blank correction is identified as the limiting factor in obtaining accurate results by ITC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baranauskienė L, Petrikaitė V, Matulienė J, Matulis D (2009) Titration calorimetry standards and the precision of isothermal titration calorimetry data. Int J Mol Sci 10:2752–2762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg RL, Vanderzee CE (1978) Enthalpies of dilution of sodium carbonate and sodium hydrogen carbonate solutions, and standard enthalpies of ionization of aqueous carbonic acid at 298.15 K. J Chem Thermodyn 10:1049–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Hunter WG, Hunter JS (1978) Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. John Wiley & Sons, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecker J, Vargas C, Keller S (2011) Revisiting the optimal c value for isothermal titration calorimetry. Analyt Biochem 418:307–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano BM, Eggers DK (2013) Experimental support for a desolvation energy term in governing equations for binding equilibria. J Phys Chem B 117:8180–8188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen T, Gooden DM, Kung JE, Toone EJ (2003) Additivity and the physical basis of multivalency effects: A thermodynamic investigation of the calcium EDTA interaction. J Am Chem Soc 125:7357–7366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demarse NA, Quinn CF, Eggett DL, Russell DJ, Hansen LD (2011) Calibration of nanowatt isothermal titration calorimeters with overflow reaction vessels. Analyt Biochem 417:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg RN, Kishore N, Lennen RM (2002) Thermodynamic quantities for the ionization reactions of buffers. J Phys Chem Ref Data 31:231–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griko YV (1999) Energetics of Ca2+-EDTA interactions: calorimetric study. Biophys Chem 79:117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Transtrum MK, Quinn CF, Demarse NA (2016) Enzyme-catalyzed and binding reaction kinetics determined by titration calorimetry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860(5):957–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Christensen JJ, Izatt RM (1965) Entropy Titration A Calorimetric Method for the Determination of ∆G° (K), ∆H° and ∆S°. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 3:36–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Fellingham GW, Russell DJ (2011) Simultaneous determination of equilibrium constants and enthalpy changes by titration calorimetry: Methods, instruments, and uncertainties. Analyt Biochem 409:220–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LD, Transtrum MK, Quinn CF (2018) Titration calorimetry from concept to application. Springer Briefs in Molecular Science, Springer International Publishing

  • Kantonen SA, Henriksen NM, Gilson MK (2017) Evaluation and minimization of uncertainty in ITC binding measurements: Heat error, concentration error, saturation, and stoichiometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 1861:485–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marini MA, Evans WJ, Berger RL (1985) Use of the twin-cell differential titration calorimeter for binding studies I EDTA and its calcium complex. J Biochem Biophys Methods 10:273–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mizoue LS, Tellinghuisen J (2004) Calorimetric vs. van’t Hoff binding enthalpies from isothermal titration calorimetry: Ba2+-crown ether complexation. Biophys Chem 110:15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Myszka DG, Abdiche YN, Arisaka F, Byron O, Eisenstein E, Hensley P, Thomson JA, Lombardo CR, Schwarz F, Stafford W, Doyle ML (2003) The ABRF-MIRG’02 Study: Assembly State, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Analysis of an Enzyme/Inhibitor Interaction. J Biomolecular Techniques 14:247–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien L, Root H, Wei C, Eder D (2015) M2+-EDTA binding affinities: A modern experiment in thermodynamics for the physical chemistry laboratory. J Chem Ed 92(9):1547–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paketurytė V, Linkuvienė V, Krainer G, Chen W-Y, Matulis D (2019) Repeatability, precision, and accuracy of the enthalpies and Gibbs energies of a protein–ligand binding reaction measured by isothermal titration calorimetry. European Biophys J Biophys Letters 48(2):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafols C, Bosch E, Barbas E, Prohens R (2016) The Ca2+-EDTA chelation as standard reaction to validate isothermal titration calorimeter measurements (ITC). Talanta 154:3554–3559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2003) A study of statistical error in isothermal titration calorimetry. Analyt Biochem 321:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2004) Volume errors in isothermal titration calorimetry. Analyt Biochem 333:405–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2007) Calibration in isothermal titration calorimetry: Heat and cell volume from heat of dilution of NaCl(aq). Analyt Biochem 360:47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2007) Optimizing experimental parameters in isothermal titration calorimetry: Variable volume procedures. J Phys Chem B 111:11531–11537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2008) Isothermal titration calorimetry at very low c. Analyt Biochem 373:395–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2012) Designing isothermal titration calorimetry experiments for the study of 1:1 binding: Problems with the “standard protocol. Analyt Biochem 424:211–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2016) Optimizing isothermal titration calorimetry protocols for the study of 1:1 binding: Keeping it simple. Biochim Biophys Acta 1860:861–867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J (2018) Critique of methods for estimating heats in isothermal titration calorimetry. Analyt Biochem 563:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tellinghuisen J, Chodera JD (2011) Systematic errors in isothermal titration calorimetry: Concentrations and baselines. Analyt Biochem 414:297–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull WB, Daranas AH (2003) On the value of c: Can low affinity systems be studied by isothermal titration calorimetry? J Am Chem Soc 125:14859–14866

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wadso I, Goldberg RN (2001) Standards in isothermal microcalorimetry (IUPAC technical report). Pure Applied Chemistry 73(10):1625–1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA

    Lee D. Hansen

  2. TA Instruments, Lindon, UT, 84042, USA

    Colette Quinn

Authors
  1. Lee D. Hansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Colette Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee D. Hansen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, L.D., Quinn, C. Obtaining precise and accurate results by ITC. Eur Biophys J 48, 825–835 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-019-01399-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-019-01399-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation