Abstract
Background
Microsatellite markers are an ideal molecular marker for population genetic studies such as population structure, pedigree, and kinship. The yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula) is widely distributed in coniferous and deciduous forests of eastern Asia and plays the role of an indicator and umbrella species in South Korea, given the absence of top predators such as tiger and leopard.
Objective
The aim of our study was to establish a core set of microsatellite markers that could be used for a population genetics study on M. flavigula.
Methods
We characterized 21 di-motif microsatellites for M. flavigula by Illumina next-generation sequencing. We evaluated them for a population genetics study against five established criteria together with 33 previously developed microsatellites. We calculated relatedness values between individual yellow-throated martens in two groups that were suspected to be siblings using the selected core set of markers to confirm applicability.
Results
Twenty-three loci were determined as the core set of microsatellite markers. The probability of identity P(ID) and probability of identity between siblings P(ID)sib of the core set was estimated as 2−15 and 2.2−7, respectively. Relatedness values between individuals in the two groups of M. flavigula revealed that one of the pairs was sisters, confirming that the core set can be applied to kinship studies.
Conclusion
The developed microsatellite core set in this study is expected to contribute to studies on molecular ecology and population structure of M. flavigula.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blouin MS (2003) DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 18:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00225-8
Blouin M, Parsons M, Lacaille V, Lotz S (1996) Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol 5(3):393–401
Choi T, Woo D, Yang B, Kim M, Lee S, Jeong W, Choi D (2011) Management of ecological corridor to conserve wildlife population. National Institute of Environmental Research, Incheon
Chutipong W, Duckworth JW, Timmins RJ, Choudhury A, Abramov AV, Roberton S, Long B, Rahman H, Hearn A, Dinets V, Willcox DHA (2016) Martes flavigula. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016: e.T41649A45212973. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T41649A45212973.en. Accessed 15 Sep 2017
Costa V, Pérez-González J, Santos P, Fernández-Llario P, Carranza J, Zsolnai A, Anton I, Buzgó J, Varga G, Monteiro N, Beja-Pereira A (2012) Microsatellite markers for identification and parentage analysis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). BMC Res Notes 5:479. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-479
Dakin EE, Avise JC (2004) Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity 93:504–509. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800545
Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
Garant D, Kruuk LE (2005) How to use molecular marker data to measure evolutionary parameters in wild populations. Mol Ecol 14:1843–1859. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02561.x
Garris AJ, McCOUCH SR, Kresovich S (2003) Population structure and its effect on haplotype diversity and linkage disequilibrium surrounding the xa5 locus of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 165:759–769
Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
Grassman LI Jr, Tewes ME, Silvy NJ (2005) Ranging, habitat use and activity patterns of binturong Arctictis binturong and yellow-throated marten Martes flavigula in north-central Thailand. Wildlife Biol 11:49–58. https://doi.org/10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11%5b49:RHUAAP%5d2.0.CO;2
Harrison DJ, Fuller AK, Proulx G (2005) Martens and fishers (Martes) in human-altered environments. Springer-Verlag, New York
Kim KS, Stolz U, Miller NJ, Waits ER, Guillemaud T, Sumerford DV, Sappington TW (2008) A core set of microsatellite markers for western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) population genetics studies. Environ Entomol 37:293–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/37.2.293
Lee MY, Moon HC, Jeon HS, Song EG, Woo D, Park H, Choi TY, Eo KY, Hyun Y, Lee K (2017) Characterization of 33 microsatellite markers and development of multiplex PCR for yellow-throated marten (Martes flavigula). Genet Mol Res 17:gmr16039854. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16039854
Lynch M, Ritland K (1999) Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. Genetics 152:1753–1766
Mason AS (2015) SSR genotyping. In: Batley J (ed) Plant genotyping: methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 77–89
Mueller JC (2004) Linkage disequilibrium for different scales and applications. Brief Bioinform 5:355–364
Peakall R, Smouse P (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460
Pierce AJ, Sukumal N, Khamcha D (2014) A yellow-throated marten Martes flavigula feeding on a red muntjac Muntiacus muntjak carcass. Small Carniv Conserv 51:76–78
Queller DC, Goodnight KF (1989) Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x
Reeves PA, Bowker CL, Fettig CE, Tembrock LR, Richards CM (2016) Effect of error and missing data on population structure inference using microsatellite data. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/080630
Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x
Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Misener S, Krawetz SA (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols. Methods in molecular biology, vol 132. Humana Press, New Jersey, pp 365–386
Slatkin M (1994) An exact test for neutrality based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet Res 64:71–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300032560
Slatkin M (1996) A correction to the exact test based on the Ewens sampling distribution. Genet Res 68:259–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300034236
Städele V, Vigilant L (2016) Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data. Ecol Evol 6:6107–6120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2346
Van Horn RC, Altmann J, Alberts SC (2008) Can’t get there from here: inferring kinship from pairwise genetic relatedness. Anim Behav 75:1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.027
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Resour 4:535–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x
Waits LP, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2001) Estimating the probability of identity among genotypes in natural populations: cautions and guidelines. Mol Ecol 10:249–256. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01185.x
Watterson G (1978) The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88:405–417
Zhang JK, Flouri KT, Stamatakis A (2014) PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30:614–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Conservation Genome Resource Bank for Korean Wildlife (CGRB) for providing the animal samples. This work was supported by grants from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR, NIBR201803101), Republic of Korea.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, SM., Moon, H.C., Jeon, H.S. et al. A core set of microsatellite loci for yellow-throated marten, Martes flavigula: a case of inferences of family relationships. Genes Genom 41, 1457–1465 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-019-00869-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-019-00869-9