Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

90Y Resin Microspheres Radioembolization for Colon Cancer Liver Metastases Using Full-Strength Contrast Material

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess safety and efficacy of 90Y resin microspheres administration using undiluted non-ionic contrast material (UDCM) {100% Omnipaque-300 (Iohexol)} in both the “B” and “D” lines.

Materials and methods

We reviewed all colorectal cancer liver metastases patients treated with 90Y resin microspheres radioembolization (RAE) from 2009 to 2017. As of April 2013, two experienced operators started using UDCM (study group) instead of standard sandwich infusion (control group). Occurrence of myelosuppression (leukopenia, neutropenia, erythrocytopenia or/and thrombocytopenia), stasis, nontarget delivery (NTD), median fluoroscopy radiation dose (FRD), median infusion time (IT), liver progression-free (LPFS) and overall survivals (OS) was evaluated. Complications within 6 months post-RAE were reported according to CTCAE v3.0 criteria.

Results

Study and control groups comprised 23(28%) and 58(72%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 9.1 months. There was no statistically significant difference in myelosuppression incidence within 6 months post-RAE between groups. Median FRD and IT for study and control groups were 44.6 vs. 97.35 Gy/cm2 (p = 0.048) and 31 vs. 39 min (p = 0.006), respectively. A 38% lower stasis incidence in study group was not significant (p = 0.34). NTD occurred in 1/27(4%) study vs. 5/73(7%) control group procedures (p = 1). Grade 1–2 and grade 3–4 toxicities between study and control group patients were 36%(8/22) vs. 45%(26/58), p = 0.61 and 9%(2/22) vs. 16%(9/58), p = 0.72, respectively. There was no difference in LPFS and OS between groups.

Conclusion

Administration of 90Y resin microspheres using UDCM in both lines is safe and effective, resulting in lower fluoroscopy radiation dose and shorter infusion time, without evidence of myelosuppression or increased stasis incidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Cederquist L, Chan E, Chen YJ, Cooper HS, et al. Colon Cancer, Version 1.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Nat Comprehen Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2017;15(3):370–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, Sobrero A, Van Krieken JH, Aderka D, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2016;27(8):1386–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kennedy A, Nag S, Salem R, Murthy R, McEwan AJ, Nutting C, et al. Recommendations for radioembolization of hepatic malignancies using yttrium-90 microsphere brachytherapy: a consensus panel report from the radioembolization brachytherapy oncology consortium. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68(1):13–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sotirchos VS, Petre EN, Brown KT, Brody LA, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, et al. Safe and successful yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization in a heavily pretreated patient with chemorefractory colorectal liver metastases after biliary stent placement above the Papilla. Case Rep Hepatol. 2014;2014:921406.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sofocleous CT, Garcia AR, Pandit-Taskar N, Do KG, Brody LA, Petre EN, et al. Phase I trial of selective internal radiation therapy for chemorefractory colorectal cancer liver metastases progressing after hepatic arterial pump and systemic chemotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2014;13(1):27–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hendlisz A, Van den Eynde M, Peeters M, Maleux G, Lambert B, Vannoote J, et al. Phase III trial comparing protracted intravenous fluorouracil infusion alone or with yttrium-90 resin microspheres radioembolization for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2010;28(23):3687–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Hazel G, Blackwell A, Anderson J, Price D, Moroz P, Bower G, et al. Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88(2):78–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray B, Van Hazel G, Hope M, Burton M, Moroz P, Anderson J, et al. Randomised trial of SIR-Spheres plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for treating patients with liver metastases from primary large bowel cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2001;12(12):1711–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma RA, Wasan HS, Hazel GAV, Heinemann V, Sharma NK, Taieb J, et al. Overall survival analysis of the FOXFIRE prospective randomized studies of first-line selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2017;35(15 suppl):3507

  10. Kennedy AS, Nutting C, Coldwell D, Gaiser J, Drachenberg C. Pathologic response and microdosimetry of (90)Y microspheres in man: review of four explanted whole livers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(5):1552–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma RA, Van Hazel GA, Morgan B, Berry DP, Blanshard K, Price D, et al. Radioembolization of liver metastases from colorectal cancer using yttrium-90 microspheres with concomitant systemic oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2007;25(9):1099–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vente MA, Wondergem M, van der Tweel I, van den Bosch MA, Zonnenberg BA, Lam MG, et al. Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(4):951–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cosimelli M, Golfieri R, Cagol PP, Carpanese L, Sciuto R, Maini CL, et al. Multi-centre phase II clinical trial of yttrium-90 resin microspheres alone in unresectable, chemotherapy refractory colorectal liver metastases. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(3):324–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paprottka KJ, Todica A, Ilhan H, Rubenthaler J, Schoeppe F, Michl M, et al. Evaluation of Visualization using a 50/50 (contrast media/glucose 5% solution) technique for radioembolization as an alternative to a standard sandwich technique. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017;40(11):1740–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. SIR-Spheres® Y-90 resin microspheres Package Insert. [.

  16. Sofocleous CT, Violari EG, Sotirchos VS, Shady W, Gonen M, Pandit-Taskar N, et al. Radioembolization as a salvage therapy for heavily pretreated patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: factors that affect outcomes. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2015;14(4):296–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Piana PM, Bar V, Doyle L, Anne R, Sato T, Eschelman DJ, et al. Early arterial stasis during resin-based yttrium-90 radioembolization: incidence and preliminary outcomes. HPB Off J Int Hepato Pancreato Biliary Assoc. 2014;16(4):336–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murthy R, Xiong H, Nunez R, Cohen AC, Barron B, Szklaruk J, et al. Yttrium 90 resin microspheres for the treatment of unresectable colorectal hepatic metastases after failure of multiple chemotherapy regimens: preliminary results. J Vascul Interv Radiol JVIR. 2005;16(7):937–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mantravadi RV, Spigos DG, Tan WS, Felix EL. Intraarterial yttrium 90 in the treatment of hepatic malignancy. Radiology. 1982;142(3):783–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lambert B, Sturm E, Mertens J, Oltenfreiter R, Smeets P, Troisi R, et al. Intra-arterial treatment with (9)(0)Y microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma: 4 years experience at the Ghent University Hospital. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(12):2117–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Patents.google.com. (2017). WO2002034300A1—Polymer based radionuclide containing particulate material—Google Patents. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2002034300A1/en?assignee=Sirtex+Medical+Ltd [Accessed 26 Jul. 2017].

  22. Sirtex Medical Ltd. Technical Bulletin, August 7, 2013. Available from Sirtex Medical

  23. Chao C, Stavropoulos SW, Mondschein JI, Dagli M, Sudheendra D, Nadolski G, et al. Effect of Substituting 50% isovue for sterile water as the delivery medium for SIR-Spheres: improved dose delivery and decreased incidence of stasis. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42(3):176–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. https://www.drugbank.ca/drugs/DB01362 [3.26.2018].

  25. Wang DS, Louie JD, Kothary N, Shah RP, Sze DY. Prophylactic topically applied ice to prevent cutaneous complications of nontarget chemoembolization and radioembolization. J Vascul Interv Radiol JVIR. 2013;24(4):596–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Systemic effects of local radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(7):718–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakamura N, Kusunoki Y, Akiyama M. Radiosensitivity of CD4 or CD8 positive human T-lymphocytes by an in vitro colony formation assay. Radiat Res. 1990;123(2):224–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Riaz A, Awais R, Salem R. Side effects of yttrium-90 radioembolization. Front Oncol. 2014;4:198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Murthy R, Brown DB, Salem R, Meranze SG, Coldwell DM, Krishnan S, et al. Gastrointestinal complications associated with hepatic arterial Yttrium-90 microsphere therapy. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2007;18(4):553–61; quiz 62.

  30. Dezarn WA, Cessna JT, DeWerd LA, Feng W, Gates VL, Halama J, et al. Recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine on dosimetry, imaging, and quality assurance procedures for 90Y microsphere brachytherapy in the treatment of hepatic malignancies. Med Phys. 2011;38(8):4824–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rong X, Du Y, Ljungberg M, Rault E, Vandenberghe S, Frey EC. Development and evaluation of an improved quantitative (90)Y bremsstrahlung SPECT method. Med Phys. 2012;39(5):2346–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research funded by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Support Grant/Core Grant (P30 CA008748).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantinos T. Sofocleous.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. T. Sofocleous has received research support in the past and was a consultant for Sirtex Medical. Other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

IRB waiver of approval was obtained for this retrospective cohort study. The database was HIPAA registered and compliant.

Informed Consent

The patients signed informed consent for the procedure.

Clinical Relevance Statement

90Y resin microsphere administration using undiluted non-ionic contrast material was safe and effective, providing continuous real-time infusion monitoring as well as decreasing infusion time and fluoroscopy radiation dose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurilova, I., Beets-Tan, R.G.H., Ulaner, G.A. et al. 90Y Resin Microspheres Radioembolization for Colon Cancer Liver Metastases Using Full-Strength Contrast Material. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 1419–1427 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1985-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1985-1

Keywords

Navigation