Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems
Section snippets
Objects and indexes
Although making best use of our limited processing resources demands selective attention9, 10, it is likely that attention can span more than a single object at a time. Without this, it would be hard to compare, or grasp a relation between, two or more objects. Our cognitive design may allow a compromise in which a small set of objects can be simultaneously attended to. In fact, we will suggest that our object indexing mechanism is limited to four indexes.
Indexing forms the basis for the
Object indexing
The central idea in our framework is the notion of an `object index'. We hypothesize a number of properties.
First, an object index is a mental token that functions as a pointer to an object.
Second, an index does not inherently represent any of the properties or features of the object pointed at. A finger can point at an object but the finger itself does not say whether the object is red or green, what shape it has, or what kind of object it is. Likewise, an object index is an entirely abstract
A model of infant object indexing
We align hitherto separate theoretical frameworks by distilling key ideas from adult object-based attention into a model of the infant object concept. Our model's basic claim (Fig. 2) is that the individuation of a physical object entails the assignment of a mental index that points at the object. Assignment is primarily determined on spatiotemporal grounds (`individuation by location'). Featural and, more generally, property information influences the indexing process in two distinct ways:
Key findings on infants' object cognition
We now discuss some recent studies of infants from the point of view of indexing theory. All the studies used measures of infant looking-times to expected and unexpected outcomes.
A seminal study by Spelke4, 37found that young infants' individuation judgments were influenced by spatiotemporal continuity (Fig. 3). We can interpret these findings as indexing by location. Take Spelke's first condition: as the first object appears, it is assigned an index. The index sticks to the object as it moves
Conclusions
We have constructed a set of theoretical notions, each of which is independently grounded in adult visual attention, and have fashioned a model of the infant `object concept'. Although we make specific proposals, our intention is not to take up a cast-iron stance on details. It is much too early for that. Instead, we have outlined a theoretical framework that can cast existing data in a new light and suggest new approaches to old questions. The classical idea of object representations as
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful to Susan Carey for stimulating our interest in these questions over the years, to Zenon Pylyshyn for helpful comments on an earlier draft, and to these and other members of the Princeton–Rutgers–NYU Object Group; especially Bela Julesz, Anne Treisman, Eileen Kowler, Thomas Papathomas, and Jacob Feldman for helpful discussions. This work was supported by NSF project grant SBR-9616342 awarded to A.M.L.
References (61)
Initial knowledge: six suggestions
Cognition
(1994)- et al.
Object permanence in five month old infants
Cognition
(1985) Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: object permanence in 6- and 8-month old infants
Cognition
(1986)- et al.
Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?
Cognition
(1987) - et al.
Selective attention and cognitive control
Trends Neurosci.
(1987) - et al.
Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex
Trends Neurosci.
(1983) - et al.
A feature integration theory of attention
Cognit. Psychol.
(1980) - et al.
Infants' metaphysics: the case of numerical identity
Cognit. Psychol.
(1996) - et al.
Do infants understand simple arithmetic?: a replication of Wynn (1992)
Cognit. Dev.
(1995) Reconceptualizing the origins of number knowledge: a non-numerical account
Cognit. Dev.
(1997)
The role of location indexes in spatial perception: a sketch of the FINST spatial index model
Cognition
Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention
Cognition
Selective attention and the organization of visual information
J. Exp. Psychol.
Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location
J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.
The development of object permanence: some studies of existence constancy
Pecept. Psychophys.
Infant perception of a manual pick-up event
Br. J. Dev. Psychol.
Addition and subtraction by human infants
Nature
The brain's visual world: representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex
Science
`Where' and `what' in vision
Science
Early vision and focal attention
Rev. Modern Phys.
Cited by (313)
Infants can use temporary or scant categorical information to individuate objects
2024, Cognitive PsychologyChildren's use of reasoning by exclusion to infer objects’ identities in working memory
2024, Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyThe scope and role of deduction in infant cognition
2023, Current BiologyThe development of reasoning by exclusion in infancy
2022, Cognitive PsychologyCitation Excerpt :There is an alternative explanation, on which the inference requires neither the negation nor disjunction components of reasoning by exclusion. Like other results that show infants can track the identities of objects even as they temporarily lose perceptual access to them, these findings can be explained in terms of infants’ capacity to monitor the consistency of working memory models of a scene relative to subsequent percepts (for reviews, see Carey, 2009; Kibbe, 2015; Leslie, Xu, Tremoulet, & Scholl, 1998). On this alternative explanation, infants create a mental model of the initial scene and hold it in working memory: e.g. one snake and one ball on the stage.
The development of visual cognition: The emergence of spatial congruency bias
2024, Developmental Science