The furanobisindole alkaloid, phalarine, possesses a unique structural framework within the alkaloid family of natural products. Our laboratory recently disclosed the racemic total synthesis of phalarine, featuring an efficient azaspiroindolenine rearrangement; this achievement is revisited in detail. Upon completion of the first-generation total synthesis, we explored some interesting mechanism-level issues with regard to the key azaspiroindolenine rearrangement. These investigations provided valuable insights into the mechanism of racemization during the azaspiroindolenine rearrangement en route to synthetic phalarine. In addition, in the course of these studies, we demonstrated the Pictet–Spengler capture reaction for C2-aryl indoles, and successfully isolated the elusive azaspiroindolenine intermediate of the Pictet–Spengler reaction. Key insights into the remarkably subtle stereoelectronics that govern this rearrangement for C2-arylated indoles are discussed.
Conference
International Congress on Heterocyclic Chemistry (ICHC-22), International Congress on Heterocyclic Chemistry, ICHC, Heterocyclic Chemistry, 22nd, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, 2009-08-02–2009-08-07
References
1 N. Anderton, P. A. Cockrum, S. M. Colegate, J. A. Edgar, K. Flower, D. Gardner, R. I. Willing. Phytochemistry51, 153 (1999).10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00725-0Search in Google Scholar
2 10.1039/c19670000264, A. H. Jackson, P. Smith. Chem. Commun. (London) 264 (1967).Search in Google Scholar
3 10.1016/S0031-9422(97)00946-1, N. Anderton, P. A. Cockrum, S. M. Colegate, J. A. Edgar, K. Flower, I. Vit, R. I. Willing. Phytochemistry48, 437 (1998).Search in Google Scholar
4 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)97729-X, D. P. Mulvena, K. Picker, D. D. Ridley, M. Slaytor. Phytochemistry22, 2885 (1983).Search in Google Scholar
5 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.05.041, C. Chan, C. Li, F. Zhang, S. J. Danishefsky. Tetrahedron Lett.47, 4839 (2006).Search in Google Scholar
6 J. A. Joule, K. Mills. In Heterocyclic Chemistry, pp. 324–379, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA (2000).Search in Google Scholar
7 10.1021/ja01107a008, B. Witkop, J. B. Patrick. J. Am. Chem. Soc.75, 2572 (1953).Search in Google Scholar
8 10.1021/ja00963a031, G. Buchi, R. E. Manning. J. Am. Chem. Soc.88, 2532 (1966).Search in Google Scholar
9 10.1002/anie.200604072, C. Li, C. Chan, A. C. Heimann, S. J. Danishefsky. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.46, 1448 (2007).Search in Google Scholar PubMed
10 E. Fischer, O. Hess. Ber.17, 559 (1884).Search in Google Scholar
11 E. Fischer, H. Jourdan. Ber.16, 2241 (1883).Search in Google Scholar
12 10.1021/jo00118a052, Y. Leblanc, N. Boudreault. J. Org. Chem.60, 4268 (1995).Search in Google Scholar
13 10.1080/00397919708007084, C. Dufresne, Y. Leblanc, C. Berthelette, C. McCooeye. Synth. Commun.27, 3613 (1997).Search in Google Scholar
14 10.1002/jlac.18882470208, F. R. Japp, F. Klingemann. Justus Liebigs. Ann. Chem.247, 190 (1888).Search in Google Scholar
15 10.1021/ar00069a003, H. Ishii. Acc. Chem. Res.14, 275 (1981).Search in Google Scholar
16 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)93722-0, Y. Murakami, H. Takahashi, Y. Nakazawa, M. Koshimizu, Y. Watanabe, Y. Yokoyama. Tetrahedron Lett.30, 2099 (1989).Search in Google Scholar
17 10.1021/ja00824a030, P. G. Gassman, G. Gruetzmacher, T. J. Van Bergen. J. Am. Chem. Soc.96, 5512 (1974).Search in Google Scholar
18 10.1021/ja00824a029, P. G. Gassman, T. J. Van Bergen. J. Am. Chem. Soc.96, 5508 (1974).Search in Google Scholar
19 10.1021/jo9612640, B. M. Savall, W. W. McWhorter. J. Org. Chem.61, 8696 (1996).Search in Google Scholar
20 G. Kinast, L. F. Tietze. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.15, 239 (1976).Search in Google Scholar
21 10.1016/0040-4020(68)88125-6, A. H. Jackson, P. Smith. Tetrahedron24, 2227 (1968).Search in Google Scholar
22 10.1002/anie.200604071, C. Li, C. Chan, A. C. Heimann, S. J. Danishefsky. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.46, 1444 (2007).Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23 10.1039/p29870001221, J. S. L. Ibaceta-Lizana, A. H. Jackson, N. Prasitpan, P. V. R. Shannon. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1221 (1987).Search in Google Scholar
24 10.1039/p29730000872, R. Iyer, A. H. Jackson, P. V. R. Shannon, B. Naidoo. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 872 (1973).Search in Google Scholar
25 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96344-6, A. H. Jackson, B. Naidoo, P. Smith. Tetrahedron24, 6119 (1968).Search in Google Scholar
26 10.1016/0040-4020(68)89038-6, A. H. Jackson, A. E. Smith. Tetrahedron24, 403 (1968).Search in Google Scholar
27 10.1016/0040-4039(93)85096-F, A. Genesan, C. H. Heathcock. Tetrahedron Lett.34, 439 (1993).Search in Google Scholar
28 A notable exception to the dominance of indole C3 attack is for electron-rich indoles as originally noted by Jackson and later suggested by Heathcock (see refs. [24,27]).Search in Google Scholar
29 10.1039/p29870001215, A. H. Jackson, P. P. Lynch. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1215 (1987).Search in Google Scholar
30 10.1021/jo00132a022, M. R. Winkle, R. C. Ronald. J. Org. Chem.47, 2101 (1982).Search in Google Scholar
31 10.1021/ja00017a059, R. C. Larock, E. K. Yum. J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 6689 (1991).Search in Google Scholar
32 10.1021/jo9803277, R. C. Larock, E. K. Yum, M. D. Refvik. J. Org. Chem.63, 7652 (1998).Search in Google Scholar
33 The ratio of regioisomers was dependent on reaction conditions. A 4:1 ratio of regioisomers favoring the desired regioisomer was observed in DMF with sodium carbonate as base, however the yield was variable (50–90 %). The procedure described in the Supplementary Information was highly reproducible, albeit with a decreased level of regioselectivity. For interesting discussions on the regioselectivity of the Larock indolization reaction, see refs. [32,34].Search in Google Scholar
34 10.1271/bbb.66.2273, T. Nishikawa, K. Wada, M. Isobe. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.66, 2273 (2002).Search in Google Scholar PubMed
35 Note that compound 60 was remarkably unstable to both chromatography and storage at room temperature. The half-life of this compound in organic solvents was less than 30 min as observed by TLC.Search in Google Scholar
36 10.1021/ja01338a041, H. T. Clarke, H. B. Gillespie, S. Z. Weisshaus. J. Am. Chem. Soc.55, 4571 (1933).Search in Google Scholar
37 10.1002/cber.190503801154, W. Eschweiler. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.38, 880 (1905).Search in Google Scholar
38 The amine was free-based by treatment with sodium bicarbonate. Surprisingly, in protocols where this step was avoided, an undesirable chlorination of the methoxy-bearing aryl ring was observed at the nucleophilic carbon alpha to the methoxy group and para to the phenol. This product was characterized by 1H NMR, COSY, NOESY, and mass spectrometry where the characteristic 3:1 ratio of molecular ions was observed.Search in Google Scholar
39 Encouragingly, using the optimized conditions for compound 61, compound 60 was persuaded to directly forge 35 in modest yield (40 %) where certainly a kinetically competitive degradation of compound 60 accounted for a majority of the loss in conversion for this substrate.Search in Google Scholar
40 10.1002/cber.19110440309, A. Pictet, T. Spengler. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges.44, 2030 (1911).Search in Google Scholar
41 Compound 24 was prepared from an aryl lithium insertion into the corresponding oxindole and not from a Mannich-like process (see ref. [22]).Search in Google Scholar
42 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)98529-1, R. B. Woodward, M. P. Cava, W. D. Ollis, A. Hunger, H. U. Daeniker, K. Schenker. Tetrahedron19, 247 (1963).Search in Google Scholar
43 Note that in Woodward’s synthesis of strychnine, the iminium precursor used was beneficially inactive to Mannich capture, likely due to both the presence of a C2 aryl blocking group and an additional deactivating ethyl ester on the imine (derived from ethyl glyoxylate). Instead, this intermediate was isolated via trapping the azaspiroindolenine by invoking a base-promoted Mannich cyclization with concomitant tosylation of the imine nitrogen in a system that was blocked from further reaction. Our work utilizes no such blocking mechanism and suggests that C2-aryl tryptamine derivatives will only serve as blocking groups in the absence of a suitable trap for the transient benzylic carbocation generated upon 1,2-alkyl migration. It also seems that the blocking capacity of these systems is more a function of the unique stereoelectronics of an unprotected C2-aryl azaspiroindolenine as discussed in this section.Search in Google Scholar
44 Interestingly, upon treatment of desmethoxy 67 to identical conditions, the azaspiroindolenine intermediate was not isolable, and could only be observed in the crude 1H NMR (1:1 ratio with starting material, data not shown).Search in Google Scholar
© 2013 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
