Sap flow, gas exchange, and hydraulic conductance of young apricot trees growing under a shading net and different water supplies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.014Get rights and content

Summary

The experiment was carried out in a research field near Murcia, Spain, over a 3-week period between September 26 and October 16, 2000. Sixteen trees were used in the experiment, eight of which were placed under a rectangular shading net, while the other eight were maintained in the open air. Trees were irrigated once per day and, after October 5th, water was witheld from eight trees (four shaded and four unprotected for 5 days). The leaf stomatal conductance and the photosynthesis rates were higher in the shaded trees than in the exposed plants, probably because the leaf water potential was lower in the unshaded plants. This higher leaf conductance partially compensated for the effect of low radiation on transpiration, and the reduction of daily sap flow registered in shaded trees was only around 10–20%. The net also affected trunk diameter changes, with the shaded trees showing lower values of maximum daily shrinkage. Soil water deficit and high radiation had a similar effect on plant water parameters, lowering leaf water potential, leaf stomatal conductance, and the photosynthesis rate. The effects of both conditions were accumulative and so the exposed water-stressed plants showed the lowest values of total hydraulic resistance and water use efficiency, while the shaded well-irrigated trees registered the highest values for both parameters. For this reason, we think that net shading could be extended to apricot culture in many areas in which irrigation water is scarce and insolation is high.

Introduction

Apricot trees are characterized by their large canopies, which represent a large evaporative surface, while their stem and root hydraulic conductivities are low (Alarcón et al. 2000; Domingo et al., 2002). These factors, especially in adverse conditions, may result in a tree's transpirational losses exceeding its absorptive capacity, thereby giving rise to a plant water deficit (Kriedemann and Barrs, 1981).

The adverse conditions that may result in the decoupling of transpiration and root absorption include strong insolation and high temperatures, both of which are typical of Mediterranean climates. In summer and autumn, with average midday temperatures of about 30 °C, crop transpiration may well exceed root water uptake even in well-irrigated soils, leading to temporary but excessive water deficits. In fact, previous studies have demonstrated that crop productivity in different species may be reduced in environments with high radiation, high temperature, and high water vapour pressure deficits (Syvertsen and Lloyd, 1994; Bustan, 1996). To avoid this situation in horticultural crops, shading nets have been used to reduce the radiation load (Cohen et al., 1997). It has been shown that such nets distribute the radiation to the plants growing underneath with greater efficiency (Allen and Lemon, 1974) and inhibit turbulence (Tanny and Cohen, 2003), creating a humidity blanket which contributes to a lower environmental evaporative demand (Allen, 1975). Therefore, if the net radiation of a tree can be reduced, the direct effect should be a proportional reduction in transpiration (following Penman, 1948), perhaps avoiding a water deficit. However, since the light underneath shading nets is altered, the effects of such an alteration on the physiological processes related to plant growth must be investigated. Although the reduction in radiation would probably reduce transpiration, it was thought that it might also affect photosynthesis and, therefore, plant growth.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of reflective aluminized polypropylene shading nets on the water use efficiency of young apricot trees. The variations in leaf conductance, photosynthesis, whole tree transpiration, plant hydraulic resistance, and trunk diameter under different radiation levels were measured and related in both well-irrigated and non-irrigated plants.

Section snippets

Experimental site and plant material

The experiment was conducted in a research field near Murcia, Spain, over a 3-week period between September 26 (Day 270) and October 16 (Day 290) 2000. Two-year-old apricot trees (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Búlida), grafted onto Real Fino apricot rootstock, about 2 m high and 1 m wide at the base of the crown, 4 cm trunk diameter, total leaf-area about 2 m2 were grown in 70 L plastic pots containing a soil mixture of two parts clay loam, one part peat, and one part vermiculite.

Experimental conditions and irrigation regime

Sixteen trees were used

Results

The environmental conditions during the experimental period are shown in Fig. 1. Small, non-significant differences were observed between the vapour pressure deficit (VPD) measurements made with and without shade nets. However, important differences in the photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) values were found between both growth conditions. The integrations of the area under the curves of PAR presented in Fig. 1, showed that the nets reduced the level of radiation by 42%, with this reduction

Discussion

The lower leaf water potential in the exposed water-stressed plants (Fig. 2) reflects the fact that both high radiation and the soil water deficit started plant tissue dehydratation (Cohen et al., 1981; Syvertsen, 1985; Hsiao, 1990), in the latter case because the availability of water in the soil decreased, and in the case of high radiation (unshaded trees) because the plant transpiration surpassed the maximum rate at which roots could supply water.

In accordance with the Penman–Monteith model,

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by two projects: “Riego inteligente para un manejo sostenible en frutales” (CYCIT-AGL2000-0387-CO5-04) and “Desarrollo de un equipo autónomo para la medición de caudal de savia en plantas leñosas” (PTRI995-0693-0P-02-01).

References (33)

  • R. Domingo et al.

    Physiological responses of apricot plants grafted on two different rootstocks to flooding conditions

    J Plant Physiol

    (2002)
  • J. Tanny et al.

    The effect of a small shade net on the properties of wind and selected boundary layer parameters above and within a citrus orchard

    Biosystems Eng

    (2003)
  • J.J. Alarcón et al.

    Sap flow as an indicator of transpiration and the water status of young apricot trees

    Plant Soil

    (2000)
  • L.H. Allen

    Shade-cloth microclimate of soybean

    Agron J

    (1975)
  • L.H. Allen et al.

    Carbon dioxide exchange and turbulence in a Costa Rica tropical rain forest

  • R. Brun et al.

    Micrometric measurements of stem diameter changes as a mean to detect nutritional stress of tomato plants

    Acta Hort

    (1992)
  • Bustan A. Carbohydrate availability as a factor limiting citrus productivity. PhD thesis, Hebrew University of...
  • Y. Castonguay et al.

    Leaf gas exchange in water-stressed common Bean and Tepary Bean

    Crop Sci

    (1992)
  • H. Cochard et al.

    Whole tree hydraulic conductance and water loss regulaion in Quercus petraea during droughtevidence for stomatal control of embolism?

    Ann. Sci. For.

    (1996)
  • Y. Cohen et al.

    Improvement of the heat pulse method for determining sap flow in trees

    Plant Cell Environ

    (1981)
  • S. Cohen et al.

    Response of citrus trees to modified radiation regime in semi-arid conditions

    J Exp Bot

    (1997)
  • Cohen M, Antón A, Archer P, Ameglio T, Cohen S, Moreshet M, Goldhamer D, Oncins JA. Application of water potential...
  • M. Cohen et al.

    Assessment of peach tree responses to irrigation water deficits by continuous monitoring of trunk diameter changes

    J Hort Sci Biotechnol

    (2001)
  • W.R.N. Edwards et al.

    Transpiration from a kiwifruit vine as estimated by the heat-pulse technique and the Penman–Monteith equation

    New Zealand J Agric Res

    (1984)
  • S.R. Green et al.

    Water use of kiwifruit vines and apple trees by the heat-pulse technique

    J Exp Bot

    (1988)
  • T.M. Hincley et al.

    Stomata

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text