Skip to main content
Short Research Article

Oral Approach Avoidance

A Replication and Extension for Slavic and Turkic Phonations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000458

Abstract. Words whose articulation resembles ingestion movements are preferred to words mimicking expectoration movements. This so-called in-out effect, suggesting that the oral movements caused by consonantal articulation automatically activate concordant motivational states, was already replicated in languages belonging to Germanic (e.g., German and English) and Italic (e.g., Portuguese) branches of the Indo-European family. However, it remains unknown whether such preference extends to the Indo-European branches whose writing system is based on the Cyrillic rather than Latin alphabet (e.g., Ukrainian), or whether it occurs in languages not belonging to the Indo-European family (e.g., Turkish). We replicated the in-out effect in two high-powered experiments (N = 274), with Ukrainian and Turkish native speakers, further supporting an embodied explanation for this intriguing preference.

References

  • Bakhtiari, G., Körner, A., & Topolinski, S. (2016). The role of fluency in preferences for inward over outward words. Acta Psychologica, 171, 110–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.10.006 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Cho, T., & Ladefoged, P. (1999). Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1999.0094 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Elliot, A. J., Chirkov, V. I., Kim, Y., & Sheldon, K. M. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals. Psychological Science, 12, 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329512 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Garrido, M. V., Godinho, S., & Semin, G. R. (2019). The “ins” and “outs” of person perception: The influence of consonant wanderings in judgments of warmth and competence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.11.004 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gerten, J., & Topolinski, S. (2018). Exploring the temporal boundary conditions of the articulatory in-out preference effect. Psychological Research, 1–10.Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1095-3 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Godinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2016). Oral approach-avoidance: A replication and extension for European–Portuguese phonation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2172 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Godinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2017). Branding with the in-out effect: The impact of consonantal articulation on brand evaluation. Psychology & Marketing, 34, 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21031 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Godinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2019a). The in-out effect: Re-examining the impact of training in the preference for words with inward-wandering consonantal articulation. Manuscript submitted for publication First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Godinho, S., & Garrido, M. V. (2019b). The in–out effect: Examining the role of perceptual fluency in the preference for words with inward-wandering consonantal articulation. Psychological Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01238-7 First citation in articleMedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Godinho, S., Garrido, M. V., Zürn, M., & Topolinski, S. (2018). Oral kinematics: Examining the role of edibility and valence in the in-out effect. Cognition & Emotion, 33, 1094–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1532874 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Körner, A., Bakhtiari, G., & Topolinski, S. (2018). Training articulation sequences: A first systematic modulation of the articulatory in-out effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000669 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kronrod, A., Lowrey, T., & Ackerman, J. (2014). The effect of phonetic embodiment on attitudes towards brand names. ACR North American Advances, 42, 139–140. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lindau, B., & Topolinski, S. (2018). The articulatory in-out effect resists oral motor-interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000443 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Majid, A. (2012). The role of language in a science of emotion. Emotion Review, 4, 380–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445819 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Majid, A., & Levinson, S. C. (2010). WEIRD languages have misled us, too. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X1000018X First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Özgen, E. (2000). Language, learning, and colour categorisation. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Surrey, United Kingdom First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Silva, R. R., & Topolinski, S. (2018). My username is IN! The influence of inward vs. outward wandering usernames on judgments of online seller trustworthiness. Psychology & Marketing, 35, 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21088 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Speed, L. J., Wnuk, E., & Majid, A. (2018). Studying psycholinguistics out of the lab. In A. De GrootP. HagoortEds., Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide (pp. 190–207). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Starostin, G. (2016, April). Altaic languages. Retrieved from http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-35 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Luna, D., Lerman, D. B., & Liu, M. (2012). Sound symbolism effects across languages: Implications for global brand names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2012.03.002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, I. K., & Taylor, M. M. (1965). Another look at phonetic symbolism. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022737 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016a). Mouth-watering words: Articulatory inductions of eating-like mouth movements increase perceived food palatability. Appetite, 99, 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.018 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S., & Boecker, L. (2016b). Minimal conditions of motor inductions of approach-avoidance states: The case of oral movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1589–1603. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000217 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S., Boecker, L., Erle, T. M., Bakhtiari, G., & Pecher, D. (2017). Matching between oral inward-outward movements of object names and oral movements associated with denoted objects. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1073692 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Topolinski, S., Maschmann, I. T., Pecher, D., & Winkielman, P. (2014). Oral approach-avoidance: Affective consequences of muscular articulation dynamics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036477 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614564879 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar