Skip to main content
Log in

Houston Conference: Need for More Fundamental Knowledge in Neuropsychology

  • Published:
Neuropsychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two training models in neuropsychology have been recently proposed (Guidelines of the INS-Division 40 Task Force on Education, Accreditation, and Credentialing, Clin. Neuropsychol. 1: 29–34, 1987; Hannay, H. J. et al., Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157–250, 1998). When comparing both educational models, similarities but also differences are found. According to the Houston Conference model—but not to the former model—neuropsychology represents a specialty of psychology. In the Houston Conference training model, applied knowledge is overtly emphasized, whereas fundamental or basic knowledge in neuropsychology appears weak. The proposed program does not seem to provide sufficient emphasis and background knowledge in (1) History of neuropsychology, (2) Neuropsychological syndromes, and (3) Neuropsychology theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ardila, A., Lopera, F., Pineda, D., and Rosselli, M. (1995). Neurologia comportamental y neuropsicologia. [Behavioral neurology and neuropsychology]. Acta Neurol. Colomb. 11: 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boller, F., and Grafman, J. (eds.) (1988/1997). Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vols. 1–11), Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher-Janzen, E., Strickland, T. L., and Reynolds, C. R. (eds.) (2000). Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, J. A. M. (ed.) (1985). Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 45: Clinical Neuropsychology, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannay, H. J., Bieliauskas, L. A., Crosson, B. A., Hammeke, T. A., Hamsher, K. S., and de Koffler, S. P. (1998). Proceeding of The Houston Conference on Specialty Education and Training in Clinical Neuropsychology.Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 13: 157–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidelines of the INS-Division 40 Task Force on Education, Accreditation, and Credentialing (1987). Clin. Neuropsychol. 1: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R., and Majovski, L. V. (1977). Basic approaches used in American and Soviet clinical neuropsychology. Am. Psychol. 32: 959–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez, M. F., Van Gorp, W., and Cummings, J. L. (1995). Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology: A critical comparison. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 8: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Menendez, G. (2000). In response to the 1998 APA Division 40 Presidential address: So where's the beef? Clin. Neuropsychol. 14: 202–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzell, B., Pontón, M., and Ardila, A. (eds.) (in press). International Handbook of Cross-Cultural Neuropsychology, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ardila, A. Houston Conference: Need for More Fundamental Knowledge in Neuropsychology. Neuropsychol Rev 12, 127–130 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020370728584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020370728584

Navigation