Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Penile prosthesis infections

Abstract

In this retrospective review we looked at infection rates and risk factors in penile prosthesis recipients. Computer registry records of patients implanted with three-piece inflatable prostheses from April 1986 to March 1999 were reviewed. Bacteriological culture report data were obtained from the medical records. There were 491 three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis recipients with follow-up ranging from 1 to 168 months (mean 83). All patients were implanted more than 1 y ago. There were 10 infections in 491 recipients (2.0%). In 285 primary prosthesis recipients there were seven infections (2.5%). In 206 secondary prosthesis recipients there were three infections (1.5%). Seven infections occurred in 354 non-diabetics (2.0%) and three infections occurred in 137 diabetics (2.2%). None of these differences were statistically significant. Explants for infection were performed in 8 weeks or less following implantation in eight patients. In two patients explants occurred at 17 and 26 months following implantation. Cultures from the periprosthetic space grew E. coli (four), Proteus mirabilis (two), Staph. aureus (two), and bacteroides (two). Infections occurred in 2.0% of three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis recipients. There were no statistically significant differences in infection rates between first time and repeat prosthesis recipients and between diabetic and non-diabetic recipients. Eight of the 10 infections occurred 8 weeks or less following implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kabalin JN, Kessler R. . Infectious complications of penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol 1988 139, 953–955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulcahy JJ. . Long-term experience with salvage of infected penile implants. J Urol 2000 163, 481–482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moul JW, Carson CC. . Infectious complications of penile prostheses. Infections in Urology 1989 2, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson SK, Delk JR II. . Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995 153, 659–661.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garber BB, Marcus SM. . Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection? Urology 1998 52, 291–293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Radomski SB, Herschorn S. . Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection. J Urol 1992 147, 383–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarow JP. . Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 1996 156, 402–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gasser TC, Larsen EH, Bruskewitz RG. . Penile prosthesis reimplantation. J Urol 1987 137, 46–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. . Infections in bionic man: the pathobiology of infections in prosthetic devices—Part I. Current Problems in Surgery 1982 19, 217–264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dougherty SH, Simmons RL. . Infections in bionic man: the pathobiology of infections in prosthetic devices—Part II. Current Problems in Surgery 1982 19, 265–319.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nickel JC, Heaton J, Morales A, Costerton JW. . Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis-associated infection. J Urol 1986 135, 586–588.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ. . Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 1987 138, 65–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carson CC, Robertson CN. . Late hematogenous infection of penile prostheses. J Urol 1988 139, 50–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Persky L, Luria S, Porter A, Andrassy J. . Staphylococcus epidermidis in diabetic urological patient. J Urol 1986 136, 466–467.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Montague DK. . Periprosthetic infections. J Urol 1987 138, 68–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Licht MR, Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Lakin MM. . Cultures from genitourinary prostheses at reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection. J Urol 1995 154, 387–390.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bishop JR et al. Use of glycosylated hemoglobin to identify diabetics at high risk for penile periprosthetic infections. J Urol 1992 147, 386–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson SK, Carson CC, Cleves MA, Delk II Jr. . Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin. J Urol 1998 159, 1537–1540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DK Montague.

Additional information

Presented at Second Annual Fall Meeting, Society for the Study of Impotence, 15–17 September 2000, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montague, D., Angermeier, K. & Lakin, M. Penile prosthesis infections. Int J Impot Res 13, 326–328 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900768

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900768

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links