Skip to main content
Log in

The Formative Design of Epilepsy Journey: a Web-Based Executive Functioning Intervention for Adolescents with Epilepsy

  • Published:
Journal of Formative Design in Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This case study discusses the design, development, and formative evaluation of Epilepsy Journey, an individually tailored, web-based intervention designed to address the unique executive functioning (EF) needs of adolescents with epilepsy. This intervention was designed through a three-phase iterative, patient-centered participatory action research process. First, a front-end analysis was completed to identify the unique needs of adolescents with epilepsy and initial design ideas via focus groups. Second, a preliminary design of the intervention was developed from focus group results. Finally, we iteratively incorporated revisions and refinements based on patient-centered feedback collected during usability sessions. Findings based on usage analytics, user reports, and coded qualitative themes from usability sessions suggest that our iterative, patient-centered approach to design, development, and evaluation resulted in a visually appealing interactive and brief intervention that is both engaging and individually tailored to the needs of adolescents with epilepsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77–87). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1993). A practical guide to usability testing. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eason, K. (1988). Information technology and organisational change. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggins, S., Schmidt, M., Guajardo, J., & Moore, J. (2011). 3D virtual worlds: assessing the experience and informing design. International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in Information Technology, 1.

  • Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think. In R. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction, toward the year 2000 (pp. 528–547). New York: Morgan-Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, D., & Hartson, H. R. (1994). Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product and process. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. C., Dabbs, K., Walker, N. M., Jones, J. E., Hsu, D. A., Stafstrom, C. E., et al. (2013). The neuropsychological and academic substrate of new/recent-onset epilepsies. The Journal of Pediatrics, 162(5), 1047–1053.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.04.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, E. N., & Blackwell, M. C. (2015). Near-transfer effects following working memory intervention (Cogmed) in children with symptomatic epilepsy: an open randomized clinical trial. Epilepsia, 56(11), 1784–1792. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place (pp. 9–18). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, S. (2010). Rocket surgery made easy: the do-it yourself guide to finding and fixing usability problems. Canada: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezak, M., Howieson, D., & Loring, D. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • McIntyre, A. (2007). Participatory action research. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAllister, W. S., Vasserman, M., Rosenthal, J., & Sherman, E. (2014). Attention and executive functions in children with epilepsy: what, why, and what to do. Applied neuropsychology: Child, 3(3), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994a). Usability engineering. Boston: AP Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994b). Usability inspection methods. In Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 413–414). ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=260531

  • Norman, D. (1988). Design of everyday things. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.

  • Piccinelli, P., Beghi, E., Borgatti, R., Ferri, M., Giordano, L., Romeo, A., et al. (2010). Neuropsychological and behavioural aspects in children and adolescents with idiopathic epilepsy at diagnosis and after 12 months of treatment. Seizure, 19(9), 540–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2010.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroyan, A. (1992). Differences in expert practice: a case from formative evaluation. Instructional Science, 21(6), 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackel, B. (1991). Usability—context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In B. Shackel & S. Richardson (Eds.), Human factors for informatics usability (pp. 21–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usage of content management systems for websites. (2017). Retrieved from https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_management/all/

  • Wade, S. L., Carey, J., & Wolfe, C. R. (2006). An online family intervention to reduce parental distress following pediatric brain injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. L., Stancin, T., Kirkwood, M., Brown, T. M., McMullen, K. M., & Taylor, H. G. (2014). Counselor-assisted problem solving (CAPS) improves behavioral outcomes in older adolescents with complicated mild to severe TBI. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(3), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828f9fe8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, S. L., Walz, N. C., Carey, J., Williams, K. M., Cass, J., Herren, L., & Yeates, K. O. (2010). A randomized trial of teen online problem solving for improving executive function deficits following pediatric traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 25(6), 409–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. London, England: Longman Pub Group.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noah J. Glaser.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glaser, N.J., Schmidt, M., Wade, S.L. et al. The Formative Design of Epilepsy Journey: a Web-Based Executive Functioning Intervention for Adolescents with Epilepsy. J Form Des Learn 1, 126–135 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0011-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0011-3

Keywords

Navigation