Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The individuality index: a measure to quantify the degree of inter-individual, spatial variability in intra-cerebral brain electric and metabolic activity

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Neurodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary neuroscience research primarily focuses on the identification of brain activation patterns commonly deviant across participant groups or experimental conditions. This approach inherently underestimates potentially meaningful intra- and inter-individual variability present in brain physiological measures. We propose a parameter referred to as ‘individuality index (II)’ that takes individual variability into account. It quantifies the degree of individual variance of brain activation patterns for different brain regions and participants. IIs can be computed based on intra-cerebral source strength values such as the ones derived from the exact low resolution electromagnetic tomography source localization software. We exemplary estimated IIs for simulated datasets. Our results illustrate how IIs are affected by different spatial activation patterns across participants and quantify their distributional properties. They suggest that the proposed indices can meaningfully quantify inter- and intra-individuality of brain activation patterns. Their application to realistic datasets will allow the identification of (1) those brain regions that show particularly heterogeneous activation patterns, the contribution of which is particularly likely to be underestimated by conventional group statistics, (2) those brain regions that can alternatively be recruited by different participants for the same tasks, and (3) their associations with potentially decisive behavioral variables such as individually applied mental strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafò MR (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Casali AG, Gosseries O, Rosanova M, Boly M, Sarasso S, Casali KR, Casarotto S, Bruno M-A, Laureys S, Tononi G, Massimi M (2013) A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med 5:198ra105. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clayson PE, Miller GA (2017) Psychometric considerations in the measurement of event-related brain potentials: guidelines for measurement and reporting. Int J Psychophysiol 111:57–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vico Fallani F, Vecchiato G, Toppi J, Astolfi L, Babiloni F (2011) Subject identification through standard EEG signals during resting states. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2011:2331–2333

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr T (2008) Complex mental processing and psychophysiology. Habilitation Thesis. University of Bremen, Germany

  • Fehr T (2013) A hybrid model for the neural representation of complex mental processing in the human brain. Cogn Neurodyn 7:89–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr T, Achtziger A, Hinrichs H, Herrmann M (2003) Interindividual differences in oscillatory brain activity in higher cognitive functions: methodological approaches in analyzing continuous MEG data. In: Reinvang I, Greenlee MW, Herrmann M (eds) The cognitive neuroscience of individual differences. bis-Publishers, Oldenburg, pp 101–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr T, Wallace GL, Erhard P, Herrmann M (2011) The neural architecture of expert calendar calculation: a matter of strategy? Neurocase 17:360–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr T, Wiechert J, Erhard P (2014) Variability in color-choice Stroop performance within and across EEG and MRI laboratory contexts. Atten Percept Psychophys 76:2495–2507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster JM (2006) The cognit: a network model of cortical representation. Int J Psychophysiol 60:125–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuster JM (2009) Cortex and memory: emergence of a new paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci 21:2047–2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamming R (1950) Error detection and error correcting codes. Bell Syst Tech J 29:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes AP, Friston KJ (1998) Generalisability, random effects, and population interferences. Neuroimage 7:754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houdé O, Tsourio-Mazoyer N (2003) Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: the neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. J Cogn Neurosci 12:721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce KE, Laurienti PJ, Burdette JH, Hayasaka S (2010) A new measure for centrality for brain networks. Plos One 5:e12200. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA (2009) Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. SCAN 4:423–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGonigle DJ (2012) Test-retest reliability in fMRI: or how I learned to stop worrying and love the variability. Neuroimage 62:1116–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milz P, Faber P, Lehmann D, Koenig T, Kochi K, Pascual-Marqui RD (2016a) The functional significance of EEG microstates-associations with modalities of thinking. Neuroimage 125:643–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milz P, Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Faber PL (2016b) Modalities of thinking: state and trait effects on cross-frequency functional independent brain networks. Brain Topogr 29:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols TE, Holmes AP (2001) Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 15:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual-Marqui RD, Lehmann D, Faber P, Milz P, Kochi K, Yoshimura M, Nishida K, Isotani T, Kinoshita T (2014) The resting microstate networks (RMN): cortical distributions, dynamics, and frequency specific information flow. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1949

  • Pirondini E, Coscia M, Minguillon J, Milán JdR, Van de Ville D, Micera S (2017) EEG topographies provide subject-specific correlates of motor control. Sci Rep 7:13229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13582-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Poldrack RA (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci 10:59–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schartner M, Seth A, Noirhomme Q, Boly M, Bruno M-A, Laureys S, Barrett A (2015) Complexity of multi-dimensional spontaneous EEG decreases during propofol induced general anaesthesia. Plos One 10:e0133532. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2005) Introduction to data mining. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirion B, Pinel P, Mériaux S, Roche A, Dehaene S, Poline J-B (2007) Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. Neuroimage 35:105–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to especially thank Prof. Dr. Erol Basar (†2017), who encouraged us again and again to think in new innovative directions. The present work was supported by the Schweizer National Fond (Grant Number: IZK0Z3_170893).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Fehr.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fehr, T., Milz, P. The individuality index: a measure to quantify the degree of inter-individual, spatial variability in intra-cerebral brain electric and metabolic activity. Cogn Neurodyn 13, 429–436 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09538-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09538-9

Keywords

Navigation