Industrial Health
Online ISSN : 1880-8026
Print ISSN : 0019-8366
ISSN-L : 0019-8366
Original Article
Smoking cessation after long-term sick leave due to cancer in comparison with cardiovascular disease: Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study
Keisuke KUWAHARAMotoki ENDOChihiro NISHIURAAi HORITakayuki OGASAWARATohru NAKAGAWAToru HONDAShuichiro YAMAMOTOHiroko OKAZAKITeppei IMAIAkiko NISHIHARAToshiaki MIYAMOTONaoko SASAKIAkihiko UEHARAMakoto YAMAMOTOTaizo MURAKAMIMakiko SHIMIZUMasafumi EGUCHITakeshi KOCHISatsue NAGAHAMAKentaro TOMITAMaki KONISHIHuanhuan HUYosuke INOUEAkiko NANRINaoki KUNUGITAIsamu KABETetsuya MIZOUESeitaro DOHIfor the Japan Epidemiology Collaboration on Occupational Health Study Group
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
Supplementary material

2020 Volume 58 Issue 3 Pages 246-253

Details
Abstract

In occupational settings, smokers may take quitting smoking seriously if they experienced long-term sick leave due to cancer or cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, no study has elucidated the smoking cessation rate after long-term sick leave. We examined the smoking cessation rate after long-term sick leave due to cancer and CVD in Japan. We followed 23 survivors who experienced long-term sick leave due to cancer and 39 survivors who experienced long-term sick leave due to CVD who reported smoking at the last health exam before the leave. Their smoking habits before and after the leave were self-reported. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted smoking cessation rates. Smoking cessation rate after long-term sick leave due to cancer was approximately 70% and that due to CVD exceeded 80%. The adjusted smoking cessation rate was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.0, 88.2) for cancer and 80.7% (95% CI: 67.7, 93.8) for CVD. Smoking cessation rate after a longer duration of sick leave (≥60 d) tended to increase for both CVD and cancer. Although any definite conclusion cannot be drawn, the data suggest that smoking cessation rate after long-term sick leave due to CVD is slightly higher than that for cancer.

Content from these authors
© 2020 by National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top