Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Advanced MR imaging of bone marrow: quantification of signal alterations on T1-weighted Dixon and T2-weighted Dixon sequences in red marrow, yellow marrow, and pathologic marrow lesions

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify and compare signal intensity (SI) changes on T1-weighted (W) and T2W Dixon imaging in yellow marrow, red marrow, and bone marrow lesions.

Materials and methods

A total of 141 patients (77 controls, 64 lesions—33 benign, 31 malignant) between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively identified. For the control group, fixed 2-cm2 region of interests (ROI) were drawn at L5, bilateral ilium and femurs on in-phase and opposed-phase T1W and T2W Dixon images. For the lesion group, ROIs of best fit were drawn around each lesion on in-phase and opposed-phase T2W Dixon images. SI changes between in-phase and opposed phase maps for each group were compared. Inter-reader analysis was performed.

Results

Yellow marrow exhibited smaller SI changes as compared to red marrow on both T1W and T2W Dixon imaging at all locations (p < 0.0001) except at L5 on T2W Dixon imaging (p = 0.206). Both benign and malignant lesions showed significantly smaller SI changes as compared to both yellow (p = 0.0087, p < 0.0001) and red marrow (p = 0.0004, p < 0.0001) on T2W Dixon imaging. Malignant lesions exhibited smaller SI change as compared to benign lesions on T2W Dixon imaging (p = 0.0005). Signal intensity loss on both red and yellow marrow were smaller on T1W Dixon as compared to T2W Dixon (0.49–0.64, 0.27–0.31 vs. 0.70–0.74, 0.48–0.71). Inter-reader agreements were excellent (0.91–0.97).

Conclusions

SI change calculated from T2-weighted Dixon imaging can adequately differentiate between yellow marrow, red marrow, and osseous lesions, both benign and malignant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CHESS:

Chemical shift-selective fat saturation

CSI:

Chemical shift imaging

ROI:

Region of interest

SI:

Signal intensity

SD:

Standard deviation

STIR:

Short inversion time inversion-recovery

W:

Weighted

References

  1. Poulton TB, Murphy WD, Duerk JL, Chapek CC, Feiglin DH. Bone marrow reconversion in adults who are smokers: MR imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161(6):1217–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vogler JB 3rd, Murphy WA. Bone marrow imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(3):679–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Howe BM, Johnson GB, Wenger DE. Current concepts in MRI of focal and diffuse malignancy of bone marrow. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17(2):137–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Douis H, Davies AM, Jeys L, Sian P. Chemical shift MRI can aid in the diagnosis of indeterminate skeletal lesions of the spine. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(4):932–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim YP, Kannengiesser S, Paek MY, et al. Differentiation between focal malignant marrow-replacing lesions and benign red marrow deposition of the spine with T2*-corrected fat-signal fraction map using a three-echo volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo Dixon sequence. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15(6):781–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee SH, Lee YH, Hahn S, Suh JS. Fat fraction estimation of morphologically normal lumbar vertebrae using the two-point mDixon turbo spin-echo MRI with flexible echo times and multipeak spectral model of fat: comparison between cancer and non-cancer patients. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;34(8):1114–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zajick DC Jr, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Carrino JA. Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow. Radiology. 2005;237(2):590–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirchgesner T, Perlepe V, Michoux N, Larbi A, Vande Berg B. Fat suppression at 2D MR imaging of the hands: Dixon method versus CHESS technique and STIR sequence. Eur J Radiol. 2017;89:40–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA, et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):217–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 1984;153(1):189–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma J. Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(3):543–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maeder Y, Dunet V, Richard R, Becce F, Omoumi P. Bone marrow metastases: T2-weighted Dixon spin-echo fat images can replace T1-weighted spin-echo images. Radiology. 2018;286(3):948–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Kim DH, et al. Measurement of fat content in vertebral marrow using a modified Dixon sequence to differentiate benign from malignant processes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(5):1534–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suh CH, Yun SJ, Jin W, Park SY, Ryu CW, Lee SH. Diagnostic performance of in-phase and opposed-phase chemical-shift imaging for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral marrow lesions: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(4):W188–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pokharel SS, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Zaheer A. Current MR imaging lipid detection techniques for diagnosis of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics. 2013;33(3):681–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chayanit Sasiponganan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasiponganan, C., Yan, K., Pezeshk, P. et al. Advanced MR imaging of bone marrow: quantification of signal alterations on T1-weighted Dixon and T2-weighted Dixon sequences in red marrow, yellow marrow, and pathologic marrow lesions. Skeletal Radiol 49, 541–548 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03303-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03303-z

Keywords

Navigation