Skip to main content
Log in

Facial asymmetry is negatively related to condition in female macaque monkeys

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The face is an important visual trait in social communication across many species. In evolutionary terms, there are large and obvious selective advantages in detecting healthy partners, both in terms of avoiding individuals with poor health to minimise contagion and in mating with individuals with high health to help ensure healthy offspring. Many models of sexual selection suggest that an individual's phenotype provides cues to their quality. Fluctuating asymmetry is a trait that is proposed to be an honest indicator of quality, and previous studies have demonstrated that rhesus monkeys gaze longer at symmetric faces, suggesting preferences for such faces. The current study examined the relationship between measured facial symmetry and measures of health in a captive population of female rhesus macaque monkeys. We measured asymmetry from landmarks marked on front-on facial photographs and computed measures of health based on veterinary health and condition ratings, number of minor and major wounds sustained and gain in weight over the first 4 years of life. Analysis revealed that facial asymmetry was negatively related to condition-related health measures, with symmetric individuals being healthier than more asymmetric individuals. Facial asymmetry appears to be an honest indicator of health in rhesus macaques, and asymmetry may then be used by conspecifics in mate-choice situations. More broadly, our data support the notion that faces are valuable sources of information in non-human primates and that sexual selection based on facial information is potentially important across the primate lineage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Clingerman KJ, Summers L (2005) Development of a body condition scoring system for nonhuman primates using Macaca mulatta as a model. Lab Anim 34:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clingerman KJ, Summers L (2012) Validation of a body condition scoring system in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): inter- and intrarater variability. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 51:31–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad SW, Merriman LA, Thompson ME (2010) Men's oxidative stress, fluctuating asymmetry and physical attractiveness. Anim Behav 80:1005–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RA, Rogers J, Katze MG et al (2007) Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome. Science 316:222–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grammer K, Thornhill R (1994) Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol 108:233–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green CJ, Knight J, Precious S, Simpkin S (1981) Ketamine alone and combined with diazepam or xylazine in laboratory-animals—a 10 year experience. Lab Anim 15:163–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal component analysis. Springer Series in statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2001) Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health—support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evol Hum Behav 22:417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2004a) When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception 33:569–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BC, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Perrett DI (2004b) The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 25:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Jones BC (2003) Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:1759–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW (2007) Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:3113–3117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Jones BC, Waitt C, Tiddeman BP, Feinberg DR, Perrett DI, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW (2008) Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS One 3:e2106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2011) Introduction. The many faces of research on face perception. Philos T Roy Soc B 366:1634–1637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning JT, Chamberlain AT (1994) Fluctuating asymmetry in gorilla canines—a sensitive indicator of environmental stress. Proc R Soc Lond B 255:189–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning JT, Scutt D, Lewis-Jones DI (1998) Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and sperm quality in men. Evol Hum Behav 19:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40:1185–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1993) Morphology and sexual selection in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica in Chernobyl, Ukraine. Proc R Soc Lond B 252:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1997) Developmental stability and fitness: a review. Am Nat 149:916–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Thornhill R (1997) A meta-analysis of the heritability of developmental stability. J Evol Biol 10:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer AR, Strobeck C (1997) Fluctuating asymmetry and developmental stability: heritability of observable variation vs. heritability of inferred cause. J Evol Biol 10:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr LA, Dove T, Hopkins WD (1998) Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. J Cogn Neurosci 10:615–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parr LA, Waller BM, Vick SJ (2007) New developments in understanding emotional facial signals in chimpanzees. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 16:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parr LA, Waller BM, Burrows AM, Gothard KM, Vick SJ (2010) Brief communication: MaqFACS: a muscle-based facial movement coding system for the rhesus macaque. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:625–630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paukner A, Huntsberry ME, Suomi SJ (2010) Visual discrimination of male and female faces by infant rhesus macaques. Dev Psychobiol 52:54–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penton-Voak IS, Jones BC, Little AC, Baker S, Tiddeman B, Burt DM, Perrett DI (2001) Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions, and male facial attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1617–1623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett DI, Hietanen JK, Oram MW, Benson PJ (1992) Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philos T Roy Soc B 335:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett DI, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Lee KJ, Rowland DA, Edwards R (1999) Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evol Hum Behav 20:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA, Clark A, Kalick SM, Hightower A, McKay R (2001) Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evol Hum Behav 22:31–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R (1999) Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues to good genes. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1913–1917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sefcek JA, King JE (2007) Chimpanzee facial symmetry: a biometric measure of chimpanzee health. Am J Primatol 69:1257–1263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C, Champoux M, Suomi SJ (1998) Rearing condition and plasma cortisol in rhesus monkey infants. Am J Primatol 46:311–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DG (1982) A comparison of the demographic structure and growth of free ranging and captive groups of rhesus monkeys Macaca mulatta. Primates 23:24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1999) Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci 3:452–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (2006) Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evol Hum Behav 27:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dongen S, Gangestad SW (2011) Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: a meta-analysis. Evol Hum Behav 32:380–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Valen L (1962) A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16:125–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waitt C, Little AC (2006) Preferences for symmetry in conspecific facial shape among Macaca mulatta. Int J Primatol 27:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Anthony Little is supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship. This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research, NICHD.

Ethical standards

The study presented here complies with the current laws of the USA in which it was performed and was approved by The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of NICHD (USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony C. Little.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Huchard

Anthony C. Little and Annika Paukner contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Little, A.C., Paukner, A., Woodward, R.A. et al. Facial asymmetry is negatively related to condition in female macaque monkeys. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66, 1311–1318 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1386-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1386-4

Keywords

Navigation